Analgesic Effect of Oral 25% Glucose Versus Oral 24% Sucrose for Pain Relief During Heel Lance in Preterm Neonates
NCT ID: NCT01931020
Last Updated: 2016-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
94 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Role of Repeated Painful Procedures in Preterm Neonates on Short Term Neurobehavioural Outcome
NCT01190995
Analgesic Efficacy of Different Doses of Sucrose During Blood Sampling in Preterm Infants
NCT02859376
Oral Glucose in Pain Alleviation Among Term Neonates
NCT03190980
Comparison of Minimal Effective Dose of Sucrose for Pain Relief in Neonates After Minor Procedure
NCT06446323
Oral Sucrose Versus Glucose for Procedural Pain in Premature Neonates
NCT01894659
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Newborn infants routinely undergo painful invasive procedures, even after uncomplicated birth. Evidence shows that neonates do feel pain and may even have increased sensitivity to pain and to its long term effects compared with older infants. Treating procedural pain has become a crucial part of neonatal care. In healthy infants, the most common painful procedures are heel lance and venipuncture. Though minimally invasive, lancing is a painful procedure that activates cortical areas in brain .Repetitive procedural pain can lead to changes in the pain sensitivity threshold therefore, adequate analgesic control is needed. Pharmacological treatments are rarely used during these procedures because of concerns about their effectiveness (topical local anesthetics or paracetamol for heel pricks) and potential adverse effects (central analgesics). Therefore, non-pharmacological interventions are valuable alternatives. Recent interventions such as sweet oral solutions (sucrose or glucose) and non-nutritive sucking have been used frequently to alleviate pain.
Use of sucrose in preterm neonates has been advocated uniformly for pain relief. However, recently few reports have raised concerns over its safety and effect on neurodevelopment. Glucose has been used in pain relief in neonates but its therapeutic efficacy in comparison to oral sucrose in direct adequately powered RCT with pain assessment tools has not been evaluated in the Indian subcontinent. The present study was planned to evaluate the efficacy of 25% glucose solution with 24% sucrose solution for analgesia during heel lance in preterm neonates.
LACUNAE IN EXISTING KNOWLEDGE Existing literature on efficacy of glucose vs. sucrose is inconclusive on superiority of either. When a Medline search was carried out it returned limited results and no results returned from the Indian subcontinent which compared the two solutions using a multidimensional pain assessment tool. There is a need for an efficacious and cheap substitute which is readily available in NICU settings and sterile. Hence, the role of 25% Glucose in neonatal pain relief and safety associated with its use needs to be evaluated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sucrose
1ml of 24%sucrose will be administered prior to heel lance
Sucrose
The enrolled neonates will be administered 1ml of 24% sucrose. After 2 minutes heel lancing will be performed after cleaning the heel of neonate with a sterile spirit swab, with an auto lancet. Neonate's faces and monitor screen will be filmed in real time by using two independent video cameras during the entire procedure i.e. staring 2 minutes prior to heel lance and continue 2 minutes after the procedure. The PIPP will be assessed at 30 seconds, 1 minute and 2 minute after the procedure.
Glucose
1ml of 25% glucose will be administered prior to heel lance
Glucose
The enrolled neonates will be administered 1ml of 25% gluose. After 2 minutes heel lancing will be performed after cleaning the heel of neonate with a sterile spirit swab, with an auto lancet. Neonate's faces and monitor screen will be filmed in real time by using two independent video cameras during the entire procedure i.e. staring 2 minutes prior to heel lance and continue 2 minutes after the procedure. The PIPP will be assessed at 30 seconds, 1 minute and 2 minute after the procedure.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sucrose
The enrolled neonates will be administered 1ml of 24% sucrose. After 2 minutes heel lancing will be performed after cleaning the heel of neonate with a sterile spirit swab, with an auto lancet. Neonate's faces and monitor screen will be filmed in real time by using two independent video cameras during the entire procedure i.e. staring 2 minutes prior to heel lance and continue 2 minutes after the procedure. The PIPP will be assessed at 30 seconds, 1 minute and 2 minute after the procedure.
Glucose
The enrolled neonates will be administered 1ml of 25% gluose. After 2 minutes heel lancing will be performed after cleaning the heel of neonate with a sterile spirit swab, with an auto lancet. Neonate's faces and monitor screen will be filmed in real time by using two independent video cameras during the entire procedure i.e. staring 2 minutes prior to heel lance and continue 2 minutes after the procedure. The PIPP will be assessed at 30 seconds, 1 minute and 2 minute after the procedure.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Infants within first 48 hours of post natal life
* Infants having clinical indication for blood sampling
* Parental consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Infants with 5min APGAR score \<7
* Infants having any syndromes, congenital anomalies or previous surgery
* Infants born to mothers known to be receiving opiates
* Infants administered muscle relaxants, sedatives \& analgesics
* Infants born under general anesthesia
34 Weeks
37 Weeks
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lady Hardinge Medical College
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
DR. VIKRAM DATTA
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Vikram Datta, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lady Hardinge Medical College
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lady Hardinge Medical College
New Delhi, Delhi1, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Glucose versus sucrose in pain
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.