The Role of Time Interval Elimination on Pain Control of Preterm Infants by Sucrose Administration

NCT ID: NCT05465694

Last Updated: 2022-07-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

98 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-01

Study Completion Date

2022-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Purpose. It has been demonstrated clearly that sucrose solutions given before a minor painful procedure can reduce pain among newborns. But, there are no entirely accepted conclusions about the time scheduling of sucrose administration prior to heel lance. In a few studies, various time intervals between sucrose intake and heel lance procedure have been proposed. The aim of this study was to obtain a deeper knowledge of the underlying mechanism by investigating whether a different initiation of heel lance in terms of timing would reduce the effect of orally administered sucrose at heel lance among preterm newborns.

Methods. A randomized, double-blind trial with a validated, neonatal, pain-scoring scale in Gulhane Medical School Hospital in Ankara, Turkey between March 2019 and January 2021. The trial included 69 preterm newborns undergoing heel lance, who were assigned randomly to 1 of 2 groups, ie, group I, with the 2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance or group II, without a time interval of per oral sucrose given prior to heel lance. Pain-related behavior during blood sampling was measured with the Premature Infants Pain Profile-Revised (PIPP-R). Crying incidence, duration, and heart rate were also recorded. The aim of this study was to help to clarify the mechanism underlying the pain-reducing effect of orally administered sucrose by attempting to determine whether elimination of the time interval prior to heel lance would reduce the effect of oral sucrose among preterm newborns. Investigators hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in pain intensity without a waiting period after sucrose ingestion, measured at 30 and 60 s following heel lance using PIPP-R, and adverse events would be higher.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The sample size was calculated based on the difference in the PIPP scores of the groups. A sample size of 54 (27 for each group) achieves 80% power to detect a large effect size of 0.8 using a two-sided Mann-Whitney U test with a significance level of 0.05.

After inclusion in the study, participating infants were randomized to one of two possible interventions during a clinically-required heel lance: 1) The 2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance (Group 1) or no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance (Group 2) combined with containment in a blanket while in an infant incubator. Enrollment and randomization into the 2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance or no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose given prior to heel lance (within 10 s) interventions were carried out by a member of the research team using a computerized off-site password protected website. Intervention allocation concealment was achieved by using randomly permuted stratified randomization of gestational week and gender. The treatment allocations were inserted into identical sealed envelopes marked only with a number. Solutions of 24% sucrose were freshly prepared daily by pharmacy using 2.4 g sucrose plus 10 ml distilled water. Solutions were packaged in 1 ml sterile syringes and further packaged in opaque sealed envelopes labeled according to the randomization code. The research team including two clinicians and nurses were masked in the treatment allocation. Outcome assessor was also blinded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neonatal Disease Pain, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

For infants in the 2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose was given prior to the heel lance intervention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Experiment began with a five-minute observation period of all outcome measures while infant was resting in an incubator. Later, attendant nurse gave 1 ml of 24% sucrose solution on neonate's tongue. In the 2-two minute-time interval prior to heel lance intervention, following two minutes of waiting period, heel lance procedure was applied to infant's foot. In no time interval of sucrose given immediately prior to heel lance intervention, attendant nurse performed heel lance procedure immediately after giving 1 ml of 24% sucrose solution sucrose on tongue. Infant's facial actions and heart rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded by using two video cameras. Recording was carried out by a nurse during whole procedure. After collecting data, researcher watched videos separately and scored them by using PIPP-R. Measurement of study outcome relied on data collection strategies: Neonatal close-up video recording of infant facial actions, pulse oximeter, observation for adverse events.

no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

In no time interval of sucrose was given immediately prior to heel lance intervention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

2-minute-time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

Experiment began with a five-minute observation period of all outcome measures while infant was resting in an incubator. Later, attendant nurse gave 1 ml of 24% sucrose solution on neonate's tongue. In the 2-two minute-time interval prior to heel lance intervention, following two minutes of waiting period, heel lance procedure was applied to infant's foot. In no time interval of sucrose given immediately prior to heel lance intervention, attendant nurse performed heel lance procedure immediately after giving 1 ml of 24% sucrose solution sucrose on tongue. Infant's facial actions and heart rate, and oxygen saturation were recorded by using two video cameras. Recording was carried out by a nurse during whole procedure. After collecting data, researcher watched videos separately and scored them by using PIPP-R. Measurement of study outcome relied on data collection strategies: Neonatal close-up video recording of infant facial actions, pulse oximeter, observation for adverse events.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

no time interval of per oral 24% sucrose

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Infants who are premature born ( ≥ 27 0/7 weeks of gestation)
* Infants who are at the postconceptional age from 34 0/7- 37 6/7 weeks of gestation
* Normal enterally fed with human milk or formula
* Infants whose mothers consented to study participation

Exclusion Criteria

* Infants who were born depressed or with birth trauma
* Infants who have previous surgery
* Infants who have an intraventricular hemorrhage
* Infants who show signs of respiratory distress
* Infants who have an infection
* Infants with significant genetic disorders
* Infants who were on sedatives, muscle relaxants, and antiepileptic
* Infants who were born to opioid-using mothers
* Infants whose parents were unable to provide written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gulhane School of Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Deniz Yaprak

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Deniz Yaprak, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Sciences, Gulhane Medicine Faculty, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GEAH.Denizyaprak.137470

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Amphia Premature Infant Pain Study
NCT01276366 COMPLETED NA