Oral Sucrose Versus Glucose for Procedural Pain in Premature Neonates

NCT ID: NCT01894659

Last Updated: 2020-09-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-02-28

Study Completion Date

2020-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Premature neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) require up to several hundred procedures during their hospitalization. Many of these are tissue-damaging procedures (TDPs) that cause pain. Through our NIH funded research, we made the novel observation that exposure to a single TDP can significantly increase ATP utilization and oxidative stress, as evidenced by increased plasma levels of hypoxanthine, uric acid and malondialdehyde in neonates exposed to TDPs as compared to controls (no TDP). Because neonates are exposed to numerous TDPs, it is relevant to explore the energy costs of repeated exposures to painful procedures, an important information that is currently not known, as the effect of this cumulative metabolic dysfunction could result in potentially treatable or preventable cell injury.

Oral sucrose analgesia is frequently given to relieve procedural pain in neonates on the basis of its effect on behavioral and physiological pain scores. However, we found, through our prospective, randomized, double blind study funded by NIH, that although oral sucrose significantly reduced pain scores, its administration before a single TDP (heel lance) significantly increased ATP utilization. This is evidenced by higher plasma concentrations of hypoxanthine and uric acid in neonates given sucrose compared to control neonates (no TDP, no sucrose) or neonates just given a pacifier. These novel findings raise concern because preterm neonates have limited ATP stores and are susceptible to cell injury due to ATP depletion. In addition, it raises the relevant concern: If a single dose of oral sucrose can alter ATP metabolism, what are the effects of exposure to multiple doses of oral sucrose? More importantly, what is the effect of multiple TDPs and/or multiple oral sucrose dosages on ATP utilization, oxidative stress and cell injury? This application will also explore the effect of 30% oral glucose, another sweet solution currently used to relieve pain, on ATP metabolism.

In this study, we will test the general hypothesis that exposure to multiple TDPs and/or multiple doses of oral sucrose analgesia compared to oral glucose or standard care, alter biochemical markers of ATP utilization, oxidative stress and cell injury. We will use a prospective randomized clinical research design to test this hypothesis during days of life 3-7 of human premature neonates. Increased ATP utilization will be quantified by concentrations of hypoxanthine, xanthine and uric acid measured using HPLC. Oxidative stress will be quantified by concentrations of allantoin using gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy, and cell injury will be quantified through urinary concentration of intestinal fatty acid binding protein, an early marker of enterocyte injury. Data from this application will provide insight into the cellular and biochemical effects of repetitive and accumulated TDPs and/or multiple doses of oral sucrose. With this knowledge, we will propose and test innovative strategies that will not only decrease pain but also will prevent cell injury or cell death.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neonatal Procedural Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

Neonates randomized to this arm will receive the standard of practice at Loma Linda University NICU.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

24% oral sucrose with pacifier

Neonates randomized to this arm will receive 24% sucrose before every painful procedure on days of life 3-7 in the NICU.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

24% oral sucrose

Intervention Type OTHER

30% oral glucose with pacifier

Neonates randomized to this arm will receive 30% oral glucose before every painful procedure on days of life 3-7.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

30% oral glucose

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

24% oral sucrose

Intervention Type OTHER

30% oral glucose

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Potential subjects are premature infants ≤ 34 weeks gestation and ≤ 7 days of age postnatally

Exclusion Criteria

1. requirement for surgery
2. intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) ≥ grade 3
3. neonates on medications such as morphine, fentanyl, versed, muscle relaxants, phenobarbital, or dilantin,
4. renal injury (plasma creatinine \> 1 mg/dl,
5. severe cyanotic heart disease or severe respiratory distress,
6. known abdominal wall or intestinal anomaly or injury (NEC),
7. chromosomal anomaly and (8) facial anomaly
Maximum Eligible Age

7 Days

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Danilyn Angeles, PhD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Danilyn Angeles, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Loma Linda University Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5130117

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.