Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
9 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2016-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sucrose Practices for Pain in Neonates
NCT02134873
Sucrose Practices for Pain in Neonates Part B
NCT02725814
Using Sugar Water to Relieve Pain in Infants
NCT00213213
The Effect of Sucrose on Pain Relief During Venous Blood Sampling in Preterm Infants
NCT02344368
Sucking and Sucrose as Pain Relief for Infants
NCT00805623
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Rationale: Sick infants in hospital need to have blood tests as part of their medical care. Oral sucrose and glucose has shown to effectively reduce behavioural responses to pain and pain scores during commonly performed painful procedures in preterm and term newborn infants and infants up to 12 months of age. However, the investigators do not know if this also works for infants already receiving a continuous infusion of opioid analgesics. The aim is to establish preliminary evidence of the effectiveness of oral sucrose in reducing pain during heel lancing or NG/OG tube insertion when concomitant opioid analgesics are being administered, and to use the pilot data to inform a full scale RCT.
Hypothesis: Infants who are receiving opioid analgesics will have lower pain scores during their blood tests (heel lance) or NG/OG tube insertion, when sucrose is given, compared to when water is given.
Primary Objective: To obtain preliminary data about the effectiveness of sucrose and concomitant opioid analgesics compared to opioid analgesics alone during the painful procedure of heel lancing or NG/OG tube insertion to inform a full scale RCT.
Secondary Objectives: To determine the acceptability of the interventions to infants' parents and to use these results to help us calculate sample size for a subsequent full trial.
Methods: A single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled pilot trial will be conducted in an urban tertiary care pediatric university-affiliated hospital NICU. The study population is all infants who are inpatients in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) who are receiving a continuous infusion of opioid analgesics and who require a heel lance for the purpose of medically-required capillary blood sampling or a NG/OG tube insertion. Study participants will be randomly allocated to receive 24% sucrose solution or a placebo solution (water). The maximum amount of the study solution will be administered according to the infant's gestational age and according to the hospital's Sucrose policy:
\<28 weeks gestation = maximum dose of 0.1 mL; 28-31 weeks gestation = maximum dose of 0.3 mL; 32-35 weeks gestation = maximum dose of 0.5 mL; \>36 weeks gestation = maximum dose between 0.5-1.0 mL.
The primary outcome measure is the difference in pain levels during the heel lance procedure or NG/OG tube insertion in the study population as assessed by the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP).
Secondary outcomes will include; i) total crying time; ii) skin conductance activity, a valid, non-invasive, physiological measure of pain and stress in infants.
Statistical analysis: PIPP scores, crying time, and skin conductance activity will be summarized using mean and standard deviation if normally distributed, and median and interquartile range (IQR) if non-normally distributed. An intention to treat analysis will be performed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sucrose 24% po
24% sucrose solution. The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHOE) pharmacy department will provide syringes labeled "NICU Pain Relief Study" containing a maximum dose of 1 mL of a 24% sucrose solution
24% sucrose po solution
CHEO pharmacy department will provide syringes labeled "NICU Pain Relief Study" containing a maximum of 1 ml dose of a 24% sucrose solution. The maximum amount of the study solution will be administered according to the infant's gestational age and according to the hospital's Sucrose policy. The total amount of the study solution will be divided into a maximum of 5 aliquots and administered throughout the procedure at two minutes prior to the heel lance, immediately prior to the heel lance, and two-minutely intervals until completion of the procedure.
Placebo po
The CHEO pharmacy department will provide a syringe labeled "NICU Pain Relief Study" containing a maximum of 1 ml dose of water (contents almost identical in color, consistency and odor to the sucrose solution) in identical packagings
Placebo po
CHEO pharmacy department will provide syringes labeled "NICU Pain Relief Study" containing a maximum of 1 ml dose of water (almost identical in color, consistency and odor placebo to the sucrose solution in identical packaging) The total amount of the study solution will be divided into 5 aliquots and administered throughout the procedure at two minutes prior to the heel lance, immediately prior to the heel lance, and two-minutely intervals until completion of the procedure
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
24% sucrose po solution
CHEO pharmacy department will provide syringes labeled "NICU Pain Relief Study" containing a maximum of 1 ml dose of a 24% sucrose solution. The maximum amount of the study solution will be administered according to the infant's gestational age and according to the hospital's Sucrose policy. The total amount of the study solution will be divided into a maximum of 5 aliquots and administered throughout the procedure at two minutes prior to the heel lance, immediately prior to the heel lance, and two-minutely intervals until completion of the procedure.
Placebo po
CHEO pharmacy department will provide syringes labeled "NICU Pain Relief Study" containing a maximum of 1 ml dose of water (almost identical in color, consistency and odor placebo to the sucrose solution in identical packaging) The total amount of the study solution will be divided into 5 aliquots and administered throughout the procedure at two minutes prior to the heel lance, immediately prior to the heel lance, and two-minutely intervals until completion of the procedure
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Who are receiving a continuous intravenous infusion of an opioid analgesic such as morphine or fentanyl at a maximum dose equivalent to 20 mcg/kg/hr of morphine and;
* Who require heel lance for medically required blood sampling or nasogastric/orogastric (NG/OG) tube insertions and;
* Who are eligible to receive sucrose as per the hospital's Sucrose policy for infants.
Exclusion Criteria
* Infants with any injury to the skin where the probe needs to be placed
* Infants with an implanted defibrillator or pacemaker
* Infants with an injury affecting sympathetic nerve conduction
* Infants exposed to antenatal methadone
* Infants who, aside from being on opioid analgesics, are ineligible to receive sucrose as per the hospital's Sucrose policy38
* If the infant's mother wishes to breastfeed during the procedure
* Infants with known or suspected fructose intolerance
* Infants with spinal cord malformation (e.g. myelomeningocele and sacral teratoma) since these infant's response, and sensitivity to pain may differ from infants without spinal cord malformations
* Infants who are unconscious, heavily sedated and those with absent gag and/or swallow reflex
* Infants who are in isolation with only essential personnel caring for them
* To ensure there is no interaction effect of muscle relaxants, which may impact on infants' ability to mount a behavioural response to pain, assessments will not be conducted until a period of 24 hours since the previous muscle relaxant dose
* Parental language barrier (if unable to speak/understand French and/or English)
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Ottawa
OTHER
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Denise Harrison
Endowed Chair in Nursing Care of Children, Youth and Families
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denise Harrison, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Barker DP, Rutter N. Exposure to invasive procedures in neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1995 Jan;72(1):F47-8. doi: 10.1136/fn.72.1.f47.
Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, Coquery S, Nolent P, Ducrocq S, Saizou C, Lapillonne A, Granier M, Durand P, Lenclen R, Coursol A, Hubert P, de Saint Blanquat L, Boelle PY, Annequin D, Cimerman P, Anand KJ, Breart G. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA. 2008 Jul 2;300(1):60-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.1.60.
Harrison D, Loughnan P, Manias E, Johnston L. Analgesics administered during minor painful procedures in a cohort of hospitalized infants: a prospective clinical audit. J Pain. 2009 Jul;10(7):715-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.011. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
Johnston CC, Collinge JM, Henderson SJ, Anand KJ. A cross-sectional survey of pain and pharmacological analgesia in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Clin J Pain. 1997 Dec;13(4):308-12. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199712000-00008.
Porter FL, Anand KJ. Epidemiology of Pain in Neonates. Research & Clinical Forums 20(4): 9-16, 1998.
Simons SH, van Dijk M, Anand KS, Roofthooft D, van Lingen RA, Tibboel D. Do we still hurt newborn babies? A prospective study of procedural pain and analgesia in neonates. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Nov;157(11):1058-64. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.157.11.1058.
Taddio A, Katz J. The effects of early pain experience in neonates on pain responses in infancy and childhood. Paediatr Drugs. 2005;7(4):245-57. doi: 10.2165/00148581-200507040-00004.
Grunau RE, Holsti L, Haley DW, Oberlander T, Weinberg J, Solimano A, Whitfield MF, Fitzgerald C, Yu W. Neonatal procedural pain exposure predicts lower cortisol and behavioral reactivity in preterm infants in the NICU. Pain. 2005 Feb;113(3):293-300. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.10.020.
Harrison D, Loughnan P, Manias E, Smith K, Johnston L. Effect of concomitant opioid analgesics and oral sucrose during heel lancing. Early Hum Dev. 2011 Feb;87(2):147-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.11.008. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
123942
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.