Arrythmia Burden in Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM)

NCT ID: NCT05704426

Last Updated: 2024-08-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Total Enrollment

2 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-01

Study Completion Date

2023-07-18

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved; commercially available device indicated for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Many candidates of this device have a previously implanted cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED)- internal cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or permanent pacemaker (PM). Patients with heart failure are at high risk for both atrial and ventricular cardiac arrhythmias.

The aim of this study is to evaluate patients for Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden episode data obtained from interrogation of their CIED 8 months or greater after Optimizer implant and compare arrhythmia burden 6 months before Optimizer Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) device insertion to 8 months or greater after Optimizer insertion (after 2 month blanking period).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Arrythmia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

OTHER

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Retrospective

Patients with available data for 6 months before the implantation of the Optimizer implantation and at least 8 months after the implantation of the optimizer at the time the study is initiated and patients with available data for 6 months before the implantation of the Optimizer implantation, but less than 8 months of follow up after Optimizer implantation at the time of the study initiation.

Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer is indicated for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 25 and 45% who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Optimizer device requires a minimally invasive implant by a cardiac electrophysiologist with two transvenous pacemaker wires implanted into the right ventricular septum and attached to a generator in an infraclavicular region, much like a pacemaker. The Optimizer device provides CCM through improved calcium handling and has been shown to reverse the negative remodeling of the left ventricle seen in HFrEF and improve left ventricular contractile strength.

Prospective

Patients prior to the implantation of the Optimizer that will take place as per standard of care.

Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer is indicated for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 25 and 45% who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Optimizer device requires a minimally invasive implant by a cardiac electrophysiologist with two transvenous pacemaker wires implanted into the right ventricular septum and attached to a generator in an infraclavicular region, much like a pacemaker. The Optimizer device provides CCM through improved calcium handling and has been shown to reverse the negative remodeling of the left ventricle seen in HFrEF and improve left ventricular contractile strength.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device

The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer is indicated for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 25 and 45% who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Optimizer device requires a minimally invasive implant by a cardiac electrophysiologist with two transvenous pacemaker wires implanted into the right ventricular septum and attached to a generator in an infraclavicular region, much like a pacemaker. The Optimizer device provides CCM through improved calcium handling and has been shown to reverse the negative remodeling of the left ventricle seen in HFrEF and improve left ventricular contractile strength.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. 1%≤AF burden≤99% in the 6 month period prior to Optimizer implant as documented the patient's CIED
2. 18 years of age or older on day of signing consent
3. Any gender
4. Functional pacemaker or ICD and using remote follow-up for their CEID
5. Not scheduled for planned catheter ablation or cardioversion
6. Ability to sign consent in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria

1. Permanent atrial fibrillation
2. Pregnancy (in prospective arm only)
3. Expected survival \<1 year
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Impulse Dynamics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hackensack Meridian Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sameer Jamal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hackensack Meridian Health

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hackensack Univeristy Medical Center

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lardizabal JA, Deedwania PC. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure. Med Clin North Am. 2012 Sep;96(5):987-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22980060 (View on PubMed)

Verma A, Kalman JM, Callans DJ. Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2017 Apr 18;135(16):1547-1563. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026054.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28416525 (View on PubMed)

Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):120-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22236222 (View on PubMed)

Mosterd A, Cost B, Hoes AW, de Bruijne MC, Deckers JW, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J. 2001 Aug;22(15):1318-27. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2533.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11465964 (View on PubMed)

Saltzman HE. Arrhythmias and heart failure. Cardiol Clin. 2014 Feb;32(1):125-33, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24286583 (View on PubMed)

Kuschyk J, Falk P, Demming T, Marx O, Morley D, Rao I, Burkhoff D. Long-term clinical experience with cardiac contractility modulation therapy delivered by the Optimizer Smart system. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jul;23(7):1160-1169. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2202. Epub 2021 May 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34002440 (View on PubMed)

Piccini JP, Dufton C, Carroll IA, Healey JS, Abraham WT, Khaykin Y, Aleong R, Krueger SK, Sauer WH, Wilton SB, Rienstra M, van Veldhuisen DJ, Anand IS, White M, Camm AJ, Ziegler PD, Marshall D, Bristow MR, Connolly SJ; Genotype-Directed Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Bucindolol and Toprol-XL for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter in Patients with Heart Failure Trial Investigators*. Bucindolol Decreases Atrial Fibrillation Burden in Patients With Heart Failure and the ADRB1 Arg389Arg Genotype. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;14(8):e009591. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009591. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34270905 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro2022-0954

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.