Arrythmia Burden in Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM)
NCT ID: NCT05704426
Last Updated: 2024-08-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
2 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-05-01
2023-07-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to evaluate patients for Atrial fibrillation (AF) burden episode data obtained from interrogation of their CIED 8 months or greater after Optimizer implant and compare arrhythmia burden 6 months before Optimizer Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) device insertion to 8 months or greater after Optimizer insertion (after 2 month blanking period).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Propensity-Matched Study of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT07209098
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
NCT05855135
Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) Therapy in Subjects With Medically Refractory Heart Failure
NCT02857309
CCM and Implementation of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure (Fix-GDMT-HF)
NCT06580392
Optimization of Cardiac Pacing Using CardioMEMS
NCT03581032
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Retrospective
Patients with available data for 6 months before the implantation of the Optimizer implantation and at least 8 months after the implantation of the optimizer at the time the study is initiated and patients with available data for 6 months before the implantation of the Optimizer implantation, but less than 8 months of follow up after Optimizer implantation at the time of the study initiation.
Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device
The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer is indicated for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 25 and 45% who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Optimizer device requires a minimally invasive implant by a cardiac electrophysiologist with two transvenous pacemaker wires implanted into the right ventricular septum and attached to a generator in an infraclavicular region, much like a pacemaker. The Optimizer device provides CCM through improved calcium handling and has been shown to reverse the negative remodeling of the left ventricle seen in HFrEF and improve left ventricular contractile strength.
Prospective
Patients prior to the implantation of the Optimizer that will take place as per standard of care.
Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device
The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer is indicated for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 25 and 45% who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Optimizer device requires a minimally invasive implant by a cardiac electrophysiologist with two transvenous pacemaker wires implanted into the right ventricular septum and attached to a generator in an infraclavicular region, much like a pacemaker. The Optimizer device provides CCM through improved calcium handling and has been shown to reverse the negative remodeling of the left ventricle seen in HFrEF and improve left ventricular contractile strength.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Impulse Dynamics Optimizer Device
The Impulse Dynamics Optimizer is indicated for patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III congestive heart failure (CHF) with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 25 and 45% who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy. The Optimizer device requires a minimally invasive implant by a cardiac electrophysiologist with two transvenous pacemaker wires implanted into the right ventricular septum and attached to a generator in an infraclavicular region, much like a pacemaker. The Optimizer device provides CCM through improved calcium handling and has been shown to reverse the negative remodeling of the left ventricle seen in HFrEF and improve left ventricular contractile strength.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. 18 years of age or older on day of signing consent
3. Any gender
4. Functional pacemaker or ICD and using remote follow-up for their CEID
5. Not scheduled for planned catheter ablation or cardioversion
6. Ability to sign consent in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy (in prospective arm only)
3. Expected survival \<1 year
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Impulse Dynamics
INDUSTRY
Hackensack Meridian Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sameer Jamal, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hackensack Meridian Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hackensack Univeristy Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lardizabal JA, Deedwania PC. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure. Med Clin North Am. 2012 Sep;96(5):987-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
Verma A, Kalman JM, Callans DJ. Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction. Circulation. 2017 Apr 18;135(16):1547-1563. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.026054.
Healey JS, Connolly SJ, Gold MR, Israel CW, Van Gelder IC, Capucci A, Lau CP, Fain E, Yang S, Bailleul C, Morillo CA, Carlson M, Themeles E, Kaufman ES, Hohnloser SH; ASSERT Investigators. Subclinical atrial fibrillation and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):120-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105575.
Mosterd A, Cost B, Hoes AW, de Bruijne MC, Deckers JW, Hofman A, Grobbee DE. The prognosis of heart failure in the general population: The Rotterdam Study. Eur Heart J. 2001 Aug;22(15):1318-27. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2533.
Saltzman HE. Arrhythmias and heart failure. Cardiol Clin. 2014 Feb;32(1):125-33, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
Kuschyk J, Falk P, Demming T, Marx O, Morley D, Rao I, Burkhoff D. Long-term clinical experience with cardiac contractility modulation therapy delivered by the Optimizer Smart system. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Jul;23(7):1160-1169. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2202. Epub 2021 May 17.
Piccini JP, Dufton C, Carroll IA, Healey JS, Abraham WT, Khaykin Y, Aleong R, Krueger SK, Sauer WH, Wilton SB, Rienstra M, van Veldhuisen DJ, Anand IS, White M, Camm AJ, Ziegler PD, Marshall D, Bristow MR, Connolly SJ; Genotype-Directed Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Bucindolol and Toprol-XL for Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter in Patients with Heart Failure Trial Investigators*. Bucindolol Decreases Atrial Fibrillation Burden in Patients With Heart Failure and the ADRB1 Arg389Arg Genotype. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Aug;14(8):e009591. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009591. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro2022-0954
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.