Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the OPTIMIZER System in Subjects With Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5
NCT ID: NCT00112125
Last Updated: 2020-08-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
428 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-02-28
2019-03-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of the OPTIMIZER® System in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Heart Failure: FIX-HF-5C
NCT01381172
Continued Access Protocol for the Evaluation of the OPTIMIZER Smart System
NCT03102437
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the 2-lead OPTIMIZER® Smart System
NCT03339310
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
NCT05855135
Interventricular Delay of Lumax HF-T for Heart Failure
NCT00508391
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Those subjects who fulfill all inclusion and exclusion criteria based upon baseline test results will be randomized to receive the OPTIMIZER™ System or to a control group. All subjects randomized will be followed for 1 year and shall receive the same study related assessments throughout the course of the study. In addition, all subjects will continue to receive optimal medical therapy for the treatment of their heart failure.
The primary efficacy assessment consists of a change in exercise tolerance measured by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at baseline and 6 months. Safety variables, such as the rate and cause of hospitalizations or death, shall be collected in both groups and shall be compared at 12 months.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Optimizer System + Optimal medical treatment
Optimizer System implanted and cardiac contractility modulation therapy activated.
OPTIMIZER System
Optimal medical treatment
Treatment with optimal medical therapy only.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
OPTIMIZER System
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who are either male or female
* Subjects who have a baseline ejection fraction of 35% or less by echocardiography.
* Subjects who have been treated for heart failure for at least 90 days (including treatment with a β-blocker for at least 90 days unless the patient is intolerant) and are in New York Heart Association functional Class III or IV at the time of enrollment.
* Subjects receiving appropriate, stable medical therapy during the 30 days prior to enrollment for treatment of heart failure, consisting of the appropriate doses of diuretics, ACE-inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker and β-blocker. Stable is defined as no more than a 100% increase or 50% decrease in dose.
* Subjects who, in the opinion of the Principle Investigator (based on the current guidelines for clinical practice), have a clinical indication for an implanted cardiac defibrillator (ICD) and/or pacemaker, must have an existing device or agree to undergo implantation of such a device unless the patient refuses to undergo the implantation of such device for personal reasons.
* Subjects who are willing and able to return for all follow-up visits.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have a potentially correctible cause of heart failure, such as valvular heart disease or congenital heart disease.
* Subjects who have clinically significant angina pectoris, consisting of angina during daily life (i.e., Canadian Cardiovascular Society Angina score of II or more), an episode of unstable angina within 30 days of enrollment, or angina and/or electrocardiography (ECG) changes during exercise testing performed during baseline evaluation.
* Subjects who have been hospitalized for heart failure which required the use of inotropic support within 30 days of enrollment.
* Subjects who have a clinically significant amount of ambient ectopy, defined as more than 8,900 premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) per 24 hours on baseline Holter monitoring.
* Subjects who have chronic atrial fibrillation or chronic atrial flutter or those cardioverted within 30 days of enrollment.
* Subjects whose exercise tolerance is limited by a condition other than heart failure (e.g., angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease \[COPD\], peripheral vascular disease, orthopedic or rheumatologic conditions) or who are unable to participate in a 6-minute walk or a cardiopulmonary stress test.
* Subjects who are scheduled for a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or a percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedure, or who have undergone a CABG procedure within 90 days or a PTCA procedure within 30 days of enrollment.
* Subjects who have a biventricular pacing system or who have an accepted indication for such a device.
* Subjects who have had a myocardial infarction within 90 days of enrollment.
* Subjects who have mechanical tricuspid or aortic valves.
* Subjects who have a prior heart transplant.
* Subjects who are participating in another experimental protocol.
* Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Impulse Dynamics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dan Burkhoff, M.D, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Impulse Dynamics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Impulse Dynamics
Orangeburg, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Burkhoff D, Shemer I, Felzen B, Shimizu J, Mika Y, Dickstein M, Prutchi D, Darvish N, Ben-Haim SA. Electric currents applied during the refractory period can modulate cardiac contractility in vitro and in vivo. Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Jan;6(1):27-34. doi: 10.1023/a:1009851107189. No abstract available.
Ellison K. Nonexcitatory stimulation: 2002: a pace odyssey. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;13(7):696-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00696.x. No abstract available.
Marrouche NF, Pavia SV, Zhuang S, Kim YJ, Tabata T, Wallick D, Saad E, Abdul-Karim A, Schweikert R, Saliba W, Tchou P, Natale A. Nonexcitatory stimulus delivery improves left ventricular function in hearts with left bundle branch block. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Jul;13(7):691-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.00691.x.
Mohri S, He KL, Dickstein M, Mika Y, Shimizu J, Shemer I, Yi GH, Wang J, Ben-Haim S, Burkhoff D. Cardiac contractility modulation by electric currents applied during the refractory period. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 May;282(5):H1642-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00959.2001.
Morita H, Suzuki G, Haddad W, Mika Y, Tanhehco EJ, Sharov VG, Goldstein S, Ben-Haim S, Sabbah HN. Cardiac contractility modulation with nonexcitatory electric signals improves left ventricular function in dogs with chronic heart failure. J Card Fail. 2003 Feb;9(1):69-75. doi: 10.1054/jcaf.2003.8.
Mohri S, Shimizu J, Mika Y, Shemer I, Wang J, Ben-Haim S, Burkhoff D. Electric currents applied during refractory period enhance contractility and systolic calcium in the ferret heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003 Apr;284(4):H1119-23. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00378.2002. Epub 2002 Nov 21.
Sabbah HN, Haddad W, Mika Y, Nass O, Aviv R, Sharov VG, Maltsev V, Felzen B, Undrovinas AI, Goldstein S, Darvish N, Ben-Haim SA. Cardiac contractility modulation with the impulse dynamics signal: studies in dogs with chronic heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2001 Jan;6(1):45-53. doi: 10.1023/a:1009855208097.
Pappone C, Rosanio S, Burkhoff D, Mika Y, Vicedomini G, Augello G, Shemer I, Prutchi D, Haddad W, Aviv R, Snir Y, Kronzon I, Alfieri O, Ben-Haim SA. Cardiac contractility modulation by electric currents applied during the refractory period in patients with heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1307-13. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(02)02868-0.
Abraham WT, Burkhoff D, Nademanee K, Carson P, Bourge R, Ellenbogen KA, Parides M, Kadish A; FIX-HF-5 Investigators and Coordinators. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cardiac contractility modulation in patients with systolic heart failure: rationale, design, and baseline patient characteristics. Am Heart J. 2008 Oct;156(4):641-648.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.05.019.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FIX-HF-5
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
#IDPT 2003-07-C
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.