Personalized Pacing: A New Paradigm for Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction or Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

NCT ID: NCT04721314

Last Updated: 2022-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

123 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-17

Study Completion Date

2021-12-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recent exploratory studies suggest that pacemaker patients with diastolic dysfunction (DD) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may benefit from a higher backup heart rate (HR) setting than the factory setting of 60 beats per minute (bpm). In this prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study, pacemaker patients with DD or overt HFpEF and either 1) intrinsic ventricular conduction or 2) conduction system or biventricular pacing will be enrolled and randomized to either a personalized lower HR setting (myPACE group, based on a height-based HR algorithm) or to the standard 60bpm backup setting (control group) for 1 year.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pacemaker Diastolic Dysfunction Diastolic Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients are randomized to either a personalized pacemaker lower heart rate setting based on a resting heart rate algorithm or to the conventional pacemaker lower rate setting of 60bpm.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators
All investigators are blinded to patient randomization. To assess subject blinding, participants are asked at 1 month and 12 month follow up if they believed that their pacemaker lower rate was changed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lower rate set to a higher, personalized backup heart rate (myPACE)

Patients randomized to this group will have their pacemaker lower heart rate setting programmed to a personalized lower rate based on a resting heart rate algorithm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Adjustment of lower rate limit

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF \>50%) and implanted pacemakers will have the lower rate limit adjusted to a personalized heart rate based on a heart rate algorithm.

Lower rate left at 60 beats-per-minute

Patients randomized to this group will have their pacemaker lower heart rate setting left at or programmed to the conventional pacemaker lower rate setting of 60bpm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Maintenance of lower rate limit

Intervention Type DEVICE

Lower rate limit will be maintained at 60 beats-per-minute

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Adjustment of lower rate limit

Patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF \>50%) and implanted pacemakers will have the lower rate limit adjusted to a personalized heart rate based on a heart rate algorithm.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Maintenance of lower rate limit

Lower rate limit will be maintained at 60 beats-per-minute

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Implanted pacemaker with either 1) intrinsic ventricular conduction or 2) conduction system or biventricular pacing or 3) RV pacing \<2% and paced QRS duration \<150ms
* Clinical evidence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction or diastolic dysfunction, based on:

* dyspnea with exertion
* or NYHA Class ≥ II heart failure
* or pulmonary edema on prior chest imaging or documented on exam
* or is taking loop diuretics for heart failure
* or had NTproBNP \>400 ng/ml in the last 24 months
* or a heart failure hospitalization in the last 2 years
* or has diastolic dysfunction on echo
* or has left ventricular hypertrophy on echo
* or has left atrial (LA) dilation (LA volume/BSA index \>28ml/m2)

Exclusion Criteria

* Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50%
* Life expectancy \< 12 months
* Symptomatic pulmonary disease on home oxygen
* Uncontrolled hypertension as defined by blood pressure \>160/100 mmHg on two checks ≥15 minutes apart
* Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
* More than moderate valvular disease
* Aortic valve replacement \< 1 year
* Angina pectoris
* Creatinine \> 2
* Hemoglobin \< 8 g/dL
* Participation in another clinical trial or registry study
* Inability to follow up for regularly scheduled pacemaker appointments or to follow up for this study
* Pregnant patients or patients of childbearing age without reliable contraceptive agent (intra-uterine device, birth control implant, compliance with contraception injections or contraception pills) for the duration of study participation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Vermont

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Margaret Infeld

Physician

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Markus Meyer, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Minnesota

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Vermont Medical Center

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Infeld M, Cyr J, Novelli AE, Rawlings R, Wahlberg K, Plante TB, de Lavallaz JDF, Habel N, Lustgarten DL, Meyer M. Clinical Outcomes With Personalized Accelerated Physiologic Pacing in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Follow-up of the myPACE Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2025 Aug 27:e252827. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2025.2827. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40864451 (View on PubMed)

Infeld M, Wahlberg K, Cicero J, Plante TB, Meagher S, Novelli A, Habel N, Krishnan AM, Silverman DN, LeWinter MM, Lustgarten DL, Meyer M. Effect of Personalized Accelerated Pacing on Quality of Life, Physical Activity, and Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Preclinical and Overt Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The myPACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2023 Mar 1;8(3):213-221. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.5320.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36723919 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

00000090

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimised Pacing Program
NCT01819662 UNKNOWN PHASE3
Optimising Pacing for Contractility 2
NCT04201015 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Pacing in Heart Failure With Preserved LVEF
NCT03215849 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA