Comparison of Physiologic Response With Rate Adaptive Pacing Driven by Minute Ventilation and Accelerometer

NCT ID: NCT02003378

Last Updated: 2013-12-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Some patients' heart rates do not increase as needed during activities and exercise, which can make them feel tired and fatigued easily. The patients in this study have a pacemaker with a FDA approved rate response sensor, which senses activity level by sensing motion (through a component known as an accelerometer) and/or breathing changes (known as minute ventilation). These changes in motion or breathing make the pacemaker increase the patient's heart rate. This study is being conducted to see which rate response sensor is better (motion driven or breathing driven). The study is also investigating whether optimizing the sensor based on the individual patient will give better results in terms of increasing the patient's exercise capacity. The hypothesis is that rate responsive pacing driven by the minute ventilation sensor results in improved functional capacity compared to accelerometer in chronotropically incompetent patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a double-blind, randomized, two-arm (with crossover to other arm) trial that will investigate the benefit of rate responsive pacing with either MV or XL in pacemaker patients that have chronotropic incompetence (CI). Blinding will occur for both the patient and the research personnel who are collecting primary endpoint data. The study will enroll patients that have an implanted dual/single chamber pacemaker, which has both the minute ventilation (MV) and accelerometer (XL) rate-adaptive sensors.

The initial study visit called as baseline visit for newly implanted patients (at 2 weeks from implant) and for previously implanted patients (at the time of enrolling in the study).

Patients will complete a 6-min walk test at the baseline study visit to screen for CI based on the intrinsic heart rate achieved during the walk while pacemaker set to DDD/VVI with both sensors set to passive. All patients that are enrolled in the study will get treadmill exercise stress test by chronotropic assessment exercise protocol (CAEP) to confirm CI. Patients will be determined to have CI by completing a maximal effort exercise treadmill stress test with peak perceived exertion by Borg scale of \>16 (18) with the pacemaker programmed to DDD/VVI with both device sensors set to passive. Patients that do not meet the criteria of CI after CAEP treadmill test will not continue in the trial.

Patients that have CI will then be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to programming the rate-adaptive sensor to either MV or XL. The MV or XL rate-adaptive sensor will be optimized for each patient using stress test derived age predicted maximum heart rate by adjusting response factor to achieve MCR slope of 1.

At the 4-week visit, patients that have CI will complete a second CAEP treadmill test in their randomized setting with pacer set as DDDR/VVIR. They will also complete 6-minute walk test and pacemaker interrogation. They will be crossed over to the other sensor group at this time by changing the sensor setting.

At 8 week visit, patients will have another CAEP treadmill test, 6-minute walk test and pacemaker interrogation in their randomized crossed over group setting.

Patients that have CI will get quality of life assessment using SF-36 questionnaire and Aquarel questionnaire at baseline visit, 4 and 8 week visit in their randomized setting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronotropic Incompetence

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Chronotropic incompetence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Minute Ventilation (MV)

Pacemaker sensor set to MV (Cross over study)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pacemaker sensor set to MV

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pacemaker sensor set to minute ventilation

Accelerometer (XL)

Pacemaker sensor set to XL (Cross over study)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pacemaker sensor set to XL

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pacemaker sensor set to accelerometer

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pacemaker sensor set to MV

Pacemaker sensor set to minute ventilation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pacemaker sensor set to XL

Pacemaker sensor set to accelerometer

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Willing and capable of providing informed consent for participation
* Previously received, or previously scheduled to receive, dual-chamber/single chamber pacemaker with active atrial and ventricular leads.Boston Scientific Ingenio K172, K173, K174; or (both Ingenio and Advantio have similar rate response features) Advantio K062, K063, K064 (Boston Scientific CRM, St. Paul, MN).
* Plans to remain in the long-term care of his/her enrolling physician and is available for study follow-up for three months post-enrollment
* Patients with or without one or more of the following are permitted to enroll:
* Sinus node dysfunction with pacemaker
* Mobitz II second degree heart block or third degree heart block with pacemaker
* Chronic atrial fibrillation and other atrial arrhythmias with controlled heart rate within the past 90 days prior to consent
* Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on rate controlling medication as long as same rhythm stays throughout the study, sinus or atrial fibrillation.
* Patients with pacemakers requiring beta blocker (or other rate limiting medications) therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Neuromuscular, orthopedic, or vascular disability that prevents normal walking (e.g., intermittent claudication, arthritis, residual stroke weakness, need for a wheelchair or walker)
* A symptom-limited exercise protocol is thought to be dangerous or contra-indicated, including but not limited to changing pattern of chest discomfort, unstable angina or uncontrolled arrhythmias Severe pulmonary disease with inability to exercise
* Severe heart failure with dyspnea at rest and inability to exercise (NYHA class IV) and qualify for the CRT-D
* Life expectancy is less than 12 months due to other medical conditions, per physician discretion
* Has or indicated for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D)
* Currently, or within 30 days prior to consent, enrolled in another investigational study that would directly impact the treatment or outcome of the current study.
* Younger than 18 years of age
* Patients with pacemakers of unipolar atrial or ventricular lead configuration
* Patients with abdominal pacemaker implants
* Patients on a ventilator
* Patients with a pacemaker with epicardial lead
* Patients with Pneumothorax, pericardial effusion or pleural effusion
* Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study (method of assessment upon physician's discretion). Pregnancy test will be done for all female patients of childbearing age before the study, and at each visit.
* Unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol requirements
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Albany Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sujata S. Balulad, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sujata Balulad, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Albany Medical College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Albany Medical College

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Wendy Stewart, MS

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 518-262-9316

Email: [email protected]

Sujata Balulad, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 518-262-5076

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Wendy Stewart, MS

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RAP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id