CRM and Fusion Beats: Effects of Progressive Fusion on Intra-left Ventricular Mechanical Function
NCT ID: NCT00610896
Last Updated: 2011-09-02
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Total Enrollment
25 participants
Study Classification
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Start Date
2008-01-31
Study Completion Date
2010-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study is looking at cardiac rhythm management (CRM) and fusion beats in patients who have a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), to determine if there is a correlation between the time between the contraction of the upper chambers of the heart (atrium) and the lower chambers of the heart, (ventricle) and heart function.
Some studies of people with pacemakers have been done to determine if shortening the time of contraction between the atrium and ventricle could benefit the function of the left ventricle. These studies have shown that there is no benefit in heart function.There have been other studies which have shown that chronic pacing of the right ventricle, especially with the lead placed at the tip of the right ventricle, can lead to a decrease in the function of the left ventricle and congestive heart failure. In some patients long term pacing of the right ventricle has also been associated with a reduction in the ability of the left ventricle to pump blood. This is know as a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, which can be documented by an echocardiogram.
This study proposes to evaluate the acute effects of progressive paced fusion beats on the left ventricle to answer the question whether there is an delay between the atrium and ventricle that is "too long" or "too short".
Some studies of people with pacemakers have been done to determine if shortening the time of contraction between the atrium and ventricle could benefit the function of the left ventricle. These studies have shown that there is no benefit in heart function.There have been other studies which have shown that chronic pacing of the right ventricle, especially with the lead placed at the tip of the right ventricle, can lead to a decrease in the function of the left ventricle and congestive heart failure. In some patients long term pacing of the right ventricle has also been associated with a reduction in the ability of the left ventricle to pump blood. This is know as a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, which can be documented by an echocardiogram.
This study proposes to evaluate the acute effects of progressive paced fusion beats on the left ventricle to answer the question whether there is an delay between the atrium and ventricle that is "too long" or "too short".
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
NCT05855135
Heart Failure
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Implantable Defibrillator User
+7 more
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Myocardial Fibrosis in Patients With Permanent Pacemakers
NCT05920226
Fibrosis
Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Flutter
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
The Prevention of Myocardial Enlargement and Dilatation Post Myocardial Infarction Study
NCT00605631
Post Myocardial Infarction
COMPLETED
NA
Conventional Biventricular Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes in Heart Failure Patients
NCT05769036
Heart Failure
Left Bundle-Branch Block
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
+4 more
RECRUITING
NA
Optimal Pacing Rate for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06445439
Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent
RECRUITING
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Cardiomyopathy
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Observational Model Type
COHORT
Study Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Observation
30 Patients with dualchamber pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Dual chamber pacemaker or ICD device
* Left Ventrical Ejection Fraction (LVEF) 40% or less
* Sinus Rhythm with intact atrioventricular conduction with a PR interval greater than 200 msec QRS less than 120 msec
* Pacing right ventricle lead in the right ventricular apex (RVA), system implanted within 6 weeks or chronically implanted system with histograms showing 20% or less right ventricle pacing
* Left Ventrical Ejection Fraction (LVEF) 40% or less
* Sinus Rhythm with intact atrioventricular conduction with a PR interval greater than 200 msec QRS less than 120 msec
* Pacing right ventricle lead in the right ventricular apex (RVA), system implanted within 6 weeks or chronically implanted system with histograms showing 20% or less right ventricle pacing
Exclusion Criteria
* LVEF greater than 40%,
* Any rhythm other than sinus rhythm
* Second degree or higher atrioventricular block
* Native Heart Rate less than 40 beats per minute or greater than 90 beats per minute
* Left ventricle or Chronic Sinus lead in non-RVA location
* Chronically implanted system with greater than 20% right ventricle pacing
* Any rhythm other than sinus rhythm
* Second degree or higher atrioventricular block
* Native Heart Rate less than 40 beats per minute or greater than 90 beats per minute
* Left ventricle or Chronic Sinus lead in non-RVA location
* Chronically implanted system with greater than 20% right ventricle pacing
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Essentia Health
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Essentia Health
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael E Mollerus, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Essentia Health
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Essentia Health
Duluth, Minnesota, United States
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Auricchio A, Sommariva L, Salo RW, Scafuri A, Chiariello L. Improvement of cardiac function in patients with severe congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease by dual chamber pacing with shortened AV delay. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993 Oct;16(10):2034-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1993.tb00997.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Gold MR, Feliciano Z, Gottlieb SS, Fisher ML. Dual-chamber pacing with a short atrioventricular delay in congestive heart failure: a randomized study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct;26(4):967-73. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00292-0.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Shinbane JS, Chu E, DeMarco T, Sobol Y, Fitzpatrick AP, Lau DM, Klinski C, Schiller NB, Griffin JC, Chatterjee K. Evaluation of acute dual-chamber pacing with a range of atrioventricular delays on cardiac performance in refractory heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Nov 1;30(5):1295-300. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00307-0.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, Greenspon AJ, Freedman RA, Lee KL, Lamas GA; MOde Selection Trial Investigators. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23):2932-7. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1. Epub 2003 Jun 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Steinberg JS, Fischer A, Wang P, Schuger C, Daubert J, McNitt S, Andrews M, Brown M, Hall WJ, Zareba W, Moss AJ; MADIT II Investigators. The clinical implications of cumulative right ventricular pacing in the multicenter automatic defibrillator trial II. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005 Apr;16(4):359-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2005.50038.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Thambo JB, Bordachar P, Garrigue S, Lafitte S, Sanders P, Reuter S, Girardot R, Crepin D, Reant P, Roudaut R, Jais P, Haissaguerre M, Clementy J, Jimenez M. Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing. Circulation. 2004 Dec 21;110(25):3766-72. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000150336.86033.8D. Epub 2004 Dec 6.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tse HF, Lau CP. Long-term effect of right ventricular pacing on myocardial perfusion and function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Mar 15;29(4):744-9. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(96)00586-4.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lieberman R, Padeletti L, Schreuder J, Jackson K, Michelucci A, Colella A, Eastman W, Valsecchi S, Hettrick DA. Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 17;48(8):1634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.099. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Yu CM, Sanderson JE, Marwick TH, Oh JK. Tissue Doppler imaging a new prognosticator for cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 May 15;49(19):1903-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.078. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Bax JJ, Bleeker GB, Marwick TH, Molhoek SG, Boersma E, Steendijk P, van der Wall EE, Schalij MJ. Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts response and prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Nov 2;44(9):1834-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.016.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Holman ER, van Erven L, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ. Right ventricular pacing can induce ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with atrial fibrillation after atrioventricular node ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 17;48(8):1642-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.05.072. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Catanzariti D, Maines M, Cemin C, Broso G, Marotta T, Vergara G. Permanent direct his bundle pacing does not induce ventricular dyssynchrony unlike conventional right ventricular apical pacing. An intrapatient acute comparison study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006 Aug;16(2):81-92. doi: 10.1007/s10840-006-9033-5. Epub 2006 Nov 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Victor F, Mabo P, Mansour H, Pavin D, Kabalu G, de Place C, Leclercq C, Daubert JC. A randomized comparison of permanent septal versus apical right ventricular pacing: short-term results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006 Mar;17(3):238-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00358.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Stambler BS, Ellenbogen K, Zhang X, Porter TR, Xie F, Malik R, Small R, Burke M, Kaplan A, Nair L, Belz M, Fuenzalida C, Gold M, Love C, Sharma A, Silverman R, Sogade F, Van Natta B, Wilkoff BL; ROVA Investigators. Right ventricular outflow versus apical pacing in pacemaker patients with congestive heart failure and atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003 Nov;14(11):1180-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2003.03216.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Olshansky B, Day JD, Moore S, Gering L, Rosenbaum M, McGuire M, Brown S, Lerew DR. Is dual-chamber programming inferior to single-chamber programming in an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator? Results of the INTRINSIC RV (Inhibition of Unnecessary RV Pacing With AVSH in ICDs) study. Circulation. 2007 Jan 2;115(1):9-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.629428. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Olshansky B, Day J, McGuire M, Hahn S, Brown S, Lerew DR. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with dual-chamber ICDs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Mar;29(3):237-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00329.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Postaci N, Yesil M, Susam I, Bayata S. The influence of different AV delays on left ventricular diastolic functions and on incidence of diastolic mitral regurgitation. Angiology. 1996 Sep;47(9):895-9. doi: 10.1177/000331979604700908.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jutzy RV, Feenstra L, Pai R, Florio J, Bansal R, Aybar R, Levine PA. Comparison of intrinsic versus paced ventricular function. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1992 Nov;15(11 Pt 2):1919-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1992.tb02994.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Videen JS, Huang SK, Bazgan ID, Mechling E, Patton DD. Hemodynamic comparison of ventricular pacing, atrioventricular sequential pacing, and atrial synchronous ventricular pacing using radionuclide ventriculography. Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jun 1;57(15):1305-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90209-2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Nielsen JC, Pedersen AK, Mortensen PT, Andersen HR. Programming a fixed long atrioventricular delay is not effective in preventing ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome. Europace. 1999 Apr;1(2):113-20. doi: 10.1053/eupc.1998.0026.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
de Cock CC, Giudici MC, Twisk JW. Comparison of the haemodynamic effects of right ventricular outflow-tract pacing with right ventricular apex pacing: a quantitative review. Europace. 2003 Jul;5(3):275-8. doi: 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00031-x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, Greene HL, Hallstrom AP, Hsia H, Kutalek SP, Sharma A; Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA. 2002 Dec 25;288(24):3115-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.24.3115.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-07-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Minimizing Ventricular Pacing
NCT01611389
UNKNOWN
NA
MAgnetic Resonance Imaging-guided implanTation of Cardioverter DEFibrillators
NCT06269692
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
Reverse Electrical Remodeling of Native Conduction in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01924221
COMPLETED
Survey of QRS Frequency at Various Left Ventricular Pacing Sites for Cardiac Resynchronization
NCT03253809
TERMINATED
NA
Circulating Biomarkers and Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia
NCT01892462
COMPLETED
Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders
NCT05760924
RECRUITING
NA
Physiologic Pacing for Symptomatic First-Degree Heart Block
NCT06245304
RECRUITING
NA
ProMRI ICD/CRT-D Post Approval Study
NCT02933619
COMPLETED
Deactivation of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator During Non-thoracic Surgical Procedures
NCT00806377
COMPLETED
Impact of Ventricular Pacing in Unselected ICD/CRT-D Patients
NCT01169896
COMPLETED
Clinical Utility and Validation of the Rhythmia Mapping System for the Treatment of Cardiac Arrhythmias
NCT03094221
COMPLETED
Monitoring of Arrhythmias and HRV in Patients With Heart Failure Treated With the CRT Pacemaker Renewal TR2
NCT00180531
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Pacing for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT01045291
COMPLETED
NA
Application of Right Atrial Left Ventricular Fusion Pacing in Patients With CRT Indications
NCT03071978
COMPLETED
NA
ProMRI Study of the Entovis Pacemaker System
NCT01761162
COMPLETED
ProMRI Study of the Entovis Pacemaker System (Phase B)
NCT02009696
COMPLETED
Progressive Ventricular Dysfunction Prevention in Pacemaker Patients
NCT00170326
COMPLETED
NA
Magnetic Resonance (MR) Conditional Tachyarrhythmia Therapy Products Post-approval Study
NCT02849769
COMPLETED
Electrophysiologic HV-interval as a Predicor for Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After TAVI
NCT01801098
COMPLETED
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Non-MRI Conditional Pacemakers and ICD Devices
NCT02906189
UNKNOWN
Optimal Coronary Sinus Lead Implantation Using Intracardiac Impedography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT01129635
COMPLETED
NA
The CT-verified Data Collection Study to Investigate the Correlation Between the Leadless Pacemaker Tip Location and Echo, ECG
NCT06910059
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Effect of Chronic Changes in Heart Rate on Congestive Heart Failure
NCT00389649
COMPLETED
NA
Sleep Apnea and CRT Upgrading
NCT01970423
COMPLETED
NA