Assessment of the Blink (First) Impression Regarding the Presence of Cancer Within Colorectal Polyps
NCT ID: NCT05699954
Last Updated: 2023-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
191 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-02-01
2023-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Unfortunately, current classification systems are complex, require extensive training and technology not available in the majority of non-tertiary hospitals. They are therefore underused leading to incorrect decision making and negative patient outcomes (e.g. piecemeal resection without the chance of endoscopic cure or unnecessary further procedures in referral centres with resultant surgery anyway or surgery for benign disease).
Studies from the field of psychology show that humans are often capable of making correct decision based on their Blink (first) impression. It is also suggested that this Blink impression is based on experience and training. This might suggest that experienced or specialist endoscopist are better at diagnosing SMI within colorectal polyp at Blink impression.
The investigators hypothesize that by training the Blink impression, endoscopist of varying experience are able to detect cancer within LNPCPs. This can be proven by assessing the Blink impression of endoscopist of varying experience regarding the presence of SMI within LNPCPs.
Increasing the accuracy of the determination of SMI within colon polyps would directly translate into improvements in patient care and outcome.
For example, if SMI is present and is not suspected, patients may undergo unnecessary endoscopic procedures for an LNPCP which will eventually require surgery anyway (inconvenience, delayed correct treatment). If the incorrect technique is performed in the context of superficial SMI, adequate assessment of complete excision or extent and type of SMI may not be possible and a patient who would otherwise have been cured may require surgery anyway (under-treatment, below standard of care outcome, delay to treatment). Conversely, if SMI is suspected in its absence patients may undergo unnecessary surgery, increased healthcare spends and mortality (over-treatment, unnecessary risk). If the presence of SMI could be accurately determined in real-time using endoscopic imaging, delays to treatment, over-treatment and the associated morbidity for patients could be avoided.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Accuracy of Human Endoscopic Detection of Submucosal Invasive Cancer in Colorectal Polyps
NCT05191095
Detection and Classification of Colon Polyps
NCT00825292
Interpretation of Endoscopic Characteristics of Colorectal Polyps With Blue Light Imaging
NCT03569124
Assessment of Endoscopic Tip Control Using a Novel Score Based on the Snare Tip Soft Coagulation of Polypectomy Margin Defects
NCT05660317
Real-Time Characterizations of Diminutive Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow Band Imaging
NCT02441998
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Presence of Blink impression features for cancer in colorectal polyps
1. 20 LNPCPs will be collected from the UZ Ghent database (all LNPCPs, ICF present).
2. A survey will be made where participant endoscopist will be informed about the study. They will here be asked for electronic consent.
3. The survey asks for demographics of the participant endosopists (experience, country where they work).
4. The last part of the survey is where the 20 images of the LNPCPs are shown. After evere image 4 questions are asked. Is this a colorectal polyp? (Yes/No)
* Is your Blink (first) Impression that this polyp contains cancer? (Yes/No)
* If "yes", why do you think that? (Free comment box)
* What treatment would you recommend for this polyp? (piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection/endoscopic submucosal disection/surgery)
5. Study will be closed after 2 weeks.
6. Data analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with LNPCPs who signed the ICF of UZ Ghent Hospital for the anonymous use images of their polyp taken during colonoscopy
Exclusion Criteria
* Image of inadequate quality as per opinion of the principal investigator
* Patient does not consent to data collection for the study (participant patient)
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UZ Gent
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ONZ-2022-0488
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.