Polyp Detection With the EndoRings™: A Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study

NCT ID: NCT01955122

Last Updated: 2017-03-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the adenoma miss rate with the EndoRings™ vs. the adenoma miss rate with Standard view colonoscopy.

To compare the polyp miss rate with the EndoRings™ vs. the polyp miss rate with Standard view colonoscopy.In addition, time measurements including time to cecum, time for withdrawal and overall procedure time will be analyzed and reported for each group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients who are scheduled for screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy will be recruited to the study and randomized to one of two groups. Each enrolled subject will undergo two "back-to-back" procedures.

Subjects in Group A (study group) will undergo a Standard view colonoscopy followed immediately by an EndoRings™ colonoscopy. Subjects in Group B (control group) will undergo an EndoRings™ colonoscopy followed immediately by a Standard view colonoscopy.

Results from the two groups will be analyzed and compared, with primary outcome measures being adenoma miss rate and polyp miss rate. Secondary outcome measures will include withdrawal time, total procedure time and characteristics of polyps detected, including size and histological results.

Subjects will be followed through a 24 hour and a 7-days telephone interview for analysis of unexpected adverse events. Clinical results will be analyzed using various statistical measures of significance.

Multi-center study with up to 126 patients. Up to 126 treated patients (2 groups of 57 patients +6 drop-out patients) will be enrolled into the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colon Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A

Tandem Colonoscopy- Each patient will undergo 2 colonoscopy procedures:

a Standard view colonoscopy followed immediately by an EndoRings™ colonoscopy.

Group Type OTHER

Tandem Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each patient will undergo a double procedure: standard colonoscopy using the EndoRings™ add-on device and Standard colonoscopy (without using the EndoRings™ add-on device) in a randomized order.

Group B

Tandem Colonoscopy- Each patient will undergo 2 colonoscopy procedures:

an EndoRings™ colonoscopy followed immediately by a Standard view colonoscopy.

Group Type OTHER

Tandem Colonoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Each patient will undergo a double procedure: standard colonoscopy using the EndoRings™ add-on device and Standard colonoscopy (without using the EndoRings™ add-on device) in a randomized order.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tandem Colonoscopy

Each patient will undergo a double procedure: standard colonoscopy using the EndoRings™ add-on device and Standard colonoscopy (without using the EndoRings™ add-on device) in a randomized order.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Colon screening

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject between the ages of 40 and 75
* The patient is undergoing colonoscopy for screening, for surveillance in follow-up of previous polypectomy or for diagnostic workup;
* Written informed consent must be available before enrollment in the trial

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of colonic resection;
* Patients with known (or newly diagnosed) inflammatory bowel disease;
* Patients with a personal history of polyposis syndrome;
* Patients with suspected chronic stricture potentially precluding complete colonoscopy;
* Patients with diverticulitis or toxic megacolon;
* Patients with a history of radiation therapy to abdomen or pelvis;
* Patients with a hemorrhagic diathesis
* Patients with acute lower GI bleeding
* Pregnant women and women with childbearing potential without adequate contraception
* Patients who are currently enrolled in another clinical investigation in which the intervention might compromise the safety of the patient's participation in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

EndoAid

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Meytal Segev, DMD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

EndoAid Ltd.

Ian Gralnek, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rambam Health Care Campus

Ori Segol, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Carmel Medical Center

Peter Siersema, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UMC Utrecht

Douglas K. Rex, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Elisha Medical Center

Haifa, Please Select, Israel

Site Status

University Medical Center Utrecht

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Israel Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Dik VK, Gralnek IM, Segol O, Suissa A, Belderbos TD, Moons LM, Segev M, Domanov S, Rex DK, Siersema PD. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study. Endoscopy. 2015 Dec;47(12):1151-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392421. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26220283 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TSDPR100

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.