Polyp Detection With the EndoRings™: A Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study
NCT ID: NCT01955122
Last Updated: 2017-03-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
126 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-07-31
2014-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
To compare the polyp miss rate with the EndoRings™ vs. the polyp miss rate with Standard view colonoscopy.In addition, time measurements including time to cecum, time for withdrawal and overall procedure time will be analyzed and reported for each group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endorings™ Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection
NCT02785783
Adenoma Miss Rate in Tandem Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy
NCT04805567
Clinical Study to Establish the Feasibility and Usability of the EndoRings™
NCT01868971
Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy vs Standard Colonoscopy on Adenoma Detection Rate
NCT03344055
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Use of ME-APDS During Colonoscopy
NCT04640792
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Subjects in Group A (study group) will undergo a Standard view colonoscopy followed immediately by an EndoRings™ colonoscopy. Subjects in Group B (control group) will undergo an EndoRings™ colonoscopy followed immediately by a Standard view colonoscopy.
Results from the two groups will be analyzed and compared, with primary outcome measures being adenoma miss rate and polyp miss rate. Secondary outcome measures will include withdrawal time, total procedure time and characteristics of polyps detected, including size and histological results.
Subjects will be followed through a 24 hour and a 7-days telephone interview for analysis of unexpected adverse events. Clinical results will be analyzed using various statistical measures of significance.
Multi-center study with up to 126 patients. Up to 126 treated patients (2 groups of 57 patients +6 drop-out patients) will be enrolled into the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
Tandem Colonoscopy- Each patient will undergo 2 colonoscopy procedures:
a Standard view colonoscopy followed immediately by an EndoRings™ colonoscopy.
Tandem Colonoscopy
Each patient will undergo a double procedure: standard colonoscopy using the EndoRings™ add-on device and Standard colonoscopy (without using the EndoRings™ add-on device) in a randomized order.
Group B
Tandem Colonoscopy- Each patient will undergo 2 colonoscopy procedures:
an EndoRings™ colonoscopy followed immediately by a Standard view colonoscopy.
Tandem Colonoscopy
Each patient will undergo a double procedure: standard colonoscopy using the EndoRings™ add-on device and Standard colonoscopy (without using the EndoRings™ add-on device) in a randomized order.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tandem Colonoscopy
Each patient will undergo a double procedure: standard colonoscopy using the EndoRings™ add-on device and Standard colonoscopy (without using the EndoRings™ add-on device) in a randomized order.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The patient is undergoing colonoscopy for screening, for surveillance in follow-up of previous polypectomy or for diagnostic workup;
* Written informed consent must be available before enrollment in the trial
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with known (or newly diagnosed) inflammatory bowel disease;
* Patients with a personal history of polyposis syndrome;
* Patients with suspected chronic stricture potentially precluding complete colonoscopy;
* Patients with diverticulitis or toxic megacolon;
* Patients with a history of radiation therapy to abdomen or pelvis;
* Patients with a hemorrhagic diathesis
* Patients with acute lower GI bleeding
* Pregnant women and women with childbearing potential without adequate contraception
* Patients who are currently enrolled in another clinical investigation in which the intervention might compromise the safety of the patient's participation in this study.
40 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
EndoAid
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Meytal Segev, DMD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
EndoAid Ltd.
Ian Gralnek, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rambam Health Care Campus
Ori Segol, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Carmel Medical Center
Peter Siersema, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UMC Utrecht
Douglas K. Rex, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Indiana University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Elisha Medical Center
Haifa, Please Select, Israel
University Medical Center Utrecht
Utrecht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dik VK, Gralnek IM, Segol O, Suissa A, Belderbos TD, Moons LM, Segev M, Domanov S, Rex DK, Siersema PD. Multicenter, randomized, tandem evaluation of EndoRings colonoscopy--results of the CLEVER study. Endoscopy. 2015 Dec;47(12):1151-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1392421. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TSDPR100
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.