Adenoma Detection Rate in Colonoscopy Performed With EndoRings
NCT ID: NCT03219918
Last Updated: 2019-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
97 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-06-19
2018-06-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EndoRings Colonoscopy for Adenoma Detection
NCT03469622
Polyp Detection With the EndoRings™: A Randomized Tandem Colonoscopy Study
NCT01955122
Adenoma Miss Rate in Tandem Endocuff-assisted Colonoscopy
NCT04805567
Endorings™ Assisted Colonoscopy Versus Standard Colonoscopy for Polyp Detection
NCT02785783
Evaluation of Endorings-2-assisted Colonoscopy: a New Accessory for Improvement of Adenoma Detection Rate?
NCT03385434
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Improving the ADR can be achieved by different means; better training of endoscopists, improved bowel preparation, optimal sedation and medico technical developments. The technical improvements have mainly been in the optimising of image and improved scope thickness and flexibility, including devices that improve visualisation by increasing the exposed colonic surface . One of these new inventions is the EndoRings II Distal Attachment.
According to the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database, the ADR of standard screening colonoscopy is between 34 and 67 % with a national average of 49 % of patients with detected adenomas. Due to the known adenoma miss rate in standard screening colonoscopies, it is important to increase the ADR on average as well as finding ways to improve ADR for centres with a lower than average ADR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Specimens i.e. removed adenomas and biopsies of suspected malignancies are analysed by pathologists according to standard procedure. The pathologist will not know the nature of specimen collection (colonoscopy with or without EndoRings). The specimens are not saved for any other study related activities.
DIAGNOSTIC
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
With EndoRings
Colonoscopy is performed with the use of the cap-device EndoRings II Distal Attachment to be attached to the tip of the colonoscope
EndoRings II Distal Attachment
Colonoscopy cap
NO EndoRings
Colonoscopy is performed conventionally without any caps
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EndoRings II Distal Attachment
Colonoscopy cap
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Age between 50 - 74 years (age range of screening population)
2. Positive HemoCult home test from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme
3. Ability to give informed consent to participation in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
1. History of colorectal cancer
2. History of Inflammatory Bowel Disease
3. Part of other control programme (e.g. HNPCC or adenoma control)
4. ASA =/\> 4 and/or necessity of general anaesthesia
5. Former surgery with removal of a part of the colon on either benign or malignant background
50 Years
74 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zealand University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Line E Line, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Zealand University Hospital Køge
Ismayil Gögenur, Prof, DMSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Zealand University Hospital Køge
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Zealand University Hospital Køge, Department of Surgery
Køge, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ZUH-KØGE-KIR1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.