Which is Better Piezosurgery or Piezosurgery With Laser in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT ID: NCT05655169
Last Updated: 2024-11-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
63 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-10-09
2021-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05227859
Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Surgical Technique in Accelerating Orthodontic Treatment
NCT02606331
Evaluation of the Levels of Pain and Discomfort and Periodontal Status Between Two Acceleration Methods of Upper Anterior Teeth Retraction
NCT05656898
Pain and Discomfort in Two Acceleration Methods of Canine Retraction
NCT05265416
Two Low-level Laser Irradiation Protocols on the Rate of Canine Retraction
NCT04926389
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regarding the piezocision with the later application of low-level laser therapy (LLLT):
After six weeks of piezosurgery, a diode laser (wavelength: 810 nm and exposure time of 10 seconds\\point) 10 seconds per point will be applied on each tooth of the six maxillary anterior teeth according to this protocol: the root will be divided theoretically into two halves; gingival and cervical, and the laser will be applied in the center of each half from both buccal and palatal sides which means four application points and total energy of 16 Joules per tooth. LLLT irradiation will be performed in the sixth week after the onset of mass retraction (day 0). After that, irradiation is repeated on days 3, 7, and 14, then every two weeks, until the class I canine relationship is achieved and/or spaces lateral to incisors are closed
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Piezosurgery and low-level laser therapy
Piezocision will be applied in this group of patients using a piezosurgery knife and after six weeks of initial retraction, low-level laser therapy will be applied in this group of patients using a diode laser device.
Piezosurgery and GaALAs diode laser
One incision will be made between the roots of the six upper anterior teeth, and two incisions will be made between the upper canines and the second premolars. The incisions will be 5 mm long and start 4 mm apical to the interdental papilla.
After six weeks of piezosurgery, GaALAs diode laser (wavelength: 810 nm and exposure time of 10 seconds\\point) 10 seconds per point will be applied.
Piezosurgery only
Piezocision will be applied in this group of patients using a piezosurgery knife
Piezosurgery
One incision will be made between the roots of the six upper anterior teeth, and two incisions will be made between the upper canines and the second premolars. The incisions will be 5 mm long and start 4 mm apical to the interdental papilla.
Traditional treatment without acceleration
In this group of patients, the en masse retraction will be conventional without any acceleration intervention.
Fixed orthodontic appliance
After the levelling and alignment phase is completed, the rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") will be inserted, then after two weeks, the en masse retraction will be started via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Piezosurgery and GaALAs diode laser
One incision will be made between the roots of the six upper anterior teeth, and two incisions will be made between the upper canines and the second premolars. The incisions will be 5 mm long and start 4 mm apical to the interdental papilla.
After six weeks of piezosurgery, GaALAs diode laser (wavelength: 810 nm and exposure time of 10 seconds\\point) 10 seconds per point will be applied.
Piezosurgery
One incision will be made between the roots of the six upper anterior teeth, and two incisions will be made between the upper canines and the second premolars. The incisions will be 5 mm long and start 4 mm apical to the interdental papilla.
Fixed orthodontic appliance
After the levelling and alignment phase is completed, the rectangular stainless steel archwires (0.019" × 0.025") will be inserted, then after two weeks, the en masse retraction will be started via closed nickel-titanium coil springs applying 250 g of force per side.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Class II Division 1 malocclusion :
* Mild/moderate skeletal Class II (sagittal discrepancy angle ≤7)
* Overjet ≤10
* Normal or excessive facial height (Clinically and then cephalometrically assessed using these three angles: mandibular/cranial base angle, maxillary/mandibular plane angle, and facial axis angle)
* Mild to moderate crowding ≤ 4
3. Permanent occlusion.
4. Existence of all the upper teeth (except third molars).
5. Good oral and periodontal health:
* Probing depth \< 4 mm
* No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
* Gingival index ≤ 1
* Plaque index ≤ 1
Exclusion Criteria
2. Presence of primary teeth in the maxillary arch
3. Missing permanent maxillary teeth (except third molars).
4. Poor oral hygiene or Current periodontal disease:
* Probing depth ≥ 4 mm
* radiographic evidence of bone loss
* Gingival index \> 1
* Plaque index \> 1
5. The patient had previous orthodontic treatment
17 Years
28 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Damascus University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mudar Mohammad Mousa, DDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Mohammad Y. Hajeer, DDS,MSc,PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Department of orthodontics, Damascus University, Syria
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Damascus
Damascus, , Syria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abdelhameed AN, Refai WMM. Evaluation of the Effect of Combined Low Energy Laser Application and Micro-Osteoperforations versus the Effect of Application of Each Technique Separately On the Rate of Orthodontic Tooth Movement. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 15;6(11):2180-2185. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.386. eCollection 2018 Nov 25.
Alfawal AMH, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Hamadah O, Brad B, Latifeh Y. Evaluation of patient-centered outcomes associated with the acceleration of canine retraction by using minimally invasive surgical procedures: A randomized clinical controlled trial. Dent Med Probl. 2020 Jul-Sep;57(3):285-293. doi: 10.17219/dmp/120181.
Hatrom AA, Zawawi KH, Al-Ali RM, Sabban HM, Zahid TM, Al-Turki GA, Hassan AH. Effect of piezocision corticotomy on en-masse retraction. Angle Orthod. 2020 Sep 1;90(5):648-654. doi: 10.2319/092719-615.1.
Al-Ibrahim HM, Hajeer MY, Alkhouri I, Zinah E. Leveling and alignment time and the periodontal status in patients with severe upper crowding treated by corticotomy-assisted self-ligating brackets in comparison with conventional or self-ligating brackets only: a 3-arm randomized controlled clinical trial. J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Feb;11(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O, Youssef N, Mahaini L. The effectiveness of traditional corticotomy vs flapless corticotomy in miniscrew-supported en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion: A single-centered, randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020 Dec;158(6):e111-e120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.08.008. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
Mousa MM, Hajeer MY, Alam MK, Aljabban O, Almahdi WH. Evaluation of low-level laser therapy and piezocision in the en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth. Eur J Orthod. 2025 Apr 8;47(3):cjaf026. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjaf026.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UDDS-Ortho-14-2022
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.