Efficiency of Piezo-Corticision in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT ID: NCT02549950
Last Updated: 2015-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-09-30
2017-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Which is Better Piezosurgery or LLLT in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05227859
Efficiency of Piezotome-Corticision Assisted Orthodontics
NCT02026258
The Effect of Corticotomy in En-mass Retraction
NCT03180151
Efficiency of Piezocision-assisted Orthodontic Treatment in Adult Patients
NCT02590835
Which is Better Piezosurgery or Piezosurgery With Laser in Accelerating Orthodontic Tooth Movement
NCT05655169
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This prospective controlled clinical trial (CCT), Split Mouth Design is conducted to assess the efficiency of piezo-corticision in accelerating tooth movement and in reducing treatment time during retraction of canine teeth in class II div 1 subjects.
Specific aim- Part I:
A- To compare rate of tooth retraction between piezo-corticised and the conventionally orthodontically moved canines
B- To compare length of treatment of both approaches.
2- Objectives of the Study Part II:
This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) is designed to assess the efficiency of piezo-corticision in accelerating tooth movement and in reducing treatment time during retraction of anterior teeth in class II div 1 and class 1 bi-maxillary protrusive subjects.
Specific aim Part II:
1. To compare rate of tooth retraction between piezo-corticised and the conventionally orthodontically moved incisors
2. To compare length of treatment of both approaches.
3. To evaluate the quality of treatment outcome of both treatment approaches according to American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) standards.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional OrthodonticTreatment
Conventional orthodontic mechanics: canine and incisor retraction
Conventional Orthodontic Mechanics
Full Fixed Orthodontic Appliance with conventional orthodontic Mechanics
Accelerated Tooth Movement
Accelerated orthodontics: Peizo-Corticision Accelerated canine and Incisor retraction
Peizocorticision
Peizocorticision a non invasive procedure used in/ to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Peizocorticision
Peizocorticision a non invasive procedure used in/ to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement
Conventional Orthodontic Mechanics
Full Fixed Orthodontic Appliance with conventional orthodontic Mechanics
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to follow instruction, able to understand the consent form and sign it.
* Adult Female and Male Saudi patients 15-35 y.o
* Subjects who are none smokers
* Subjects with good health according to American Society of Anesthesiology ASA-I with full permanent dentition regardless of the third molars.
* Subjects with good periodontal and gingival health: Gingival Index GI≤ 1
* Subjects with a none gummy smile,
* Subjects with full complement of permanent caries-free dentition; Restored teeth should be of proper sound intact fillings
* Subjects without root anomalies
* Subjects with mild-moderate skeletal and dental cephalometric measurements: OB ≤ 40%, OJ ≤ 6, ANB ≤ 5 °, SN-GOGN ≤ 29 °, Subjects' dentition Angle classification class II div 1, 3mm molar and canine occlussal relationship; and subjects with class 1 Bi-maxillary protrusion
Exclusion:
* Subjects younger than 15 y.o
* Subjects who cannot comprehend the surgical procedure and who cannot consent for themselves
* Subjects who are medically classified as ASA-II, III
* Subjects who are taking any systemic or local medications especially Insulin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bisphosphonate, corticosteroids
* Subjects who are pregnant
* Subjects who are smokers
* Subjects with craniofacial syndromes: cleft lip and palate; or facial trauma
* Subjects with unhealthy or compromised periodontium
* Subjects with a gummy smile
* Subjects with inadequately treated endodontic and dental fillings problems
* Subjects with previous root resorption or dental developmental anomalies
* Subjects who had previous orthodontic treatment
* Subjects with TMJ signs and symptoms; Mandibular functional shift
* Subjects with extreme skeletal and dental class II: SN-GOGN ≥ 32°, OJ ≥ 6mm
* Subjects will be excluded if broken brackets or lost coils which have not been replaced immediately within few days from breakage or loss.
* Subjects will be excluded if any of mini-screws failed during treatment
* Subjects who become medically unfit during course of trial
15 Years
35 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
OTHER
AL Yousef
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
AL Yousef
Sally K Al Yousef BDS; AEGD; GPR; MSc-Orthodontics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sally K Al-Yousef, MSc-Ortho
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
KAIMRC
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Guard Hospital
Riyadh, , Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mathews DP, Kokich VG. Accelerating tooth movement: the case against corticotomy-induced orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Jul;144(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.008. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RC13/261/R
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.