The Effect of Ultrasound on Orthodontic Tooth Movement

NCT ID: NCT01828164

Last Updated: 2017-05-22

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To study whether or not the Aevo System™ medical device enhances the rate of tooth movement in human subjects who use orthodontic braces.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will involve comparing the effects of tooth movement with and without ultrasound treatment in a split mouth design. Treatment will consist of using the Aevo System™ device for one 20 minute period per day for the duration of the trial (up to 24 weeks). Tooth position measurements will be taken from eligible patients prior to commencing usage of the study device. Follow-up visits will be scheduled for intra-oral clinical measurements and to take full-arch impressions. The Aevo System™ consists of an ultrasound emitting mouthpiece which is wire connected to an external handheld device. The mouthpiece is placed over the teeth and over the braces every day for 20 minutes in order to deliver the therapy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malocclusion

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment Arm

20 minutes per day of ultrasound treatment on the active side of the device. The device consists of a mouth guard type device with transducers embedded in the mouth guard. In the split mouth design, the treatment arm consist of the side of the mouth with the transducers activated.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Aevo System™ is an ultrasound emitting dental device.

Control Arm

The transducers are not activated on the control side of the device.The subjects wear the device for 20 minutes per day for the duration of the study. The device consists of a mouth guard type device with transducers embedded in the mouth guard. In the split mouth design, the control arm consist of the side of the mouth with the transducers deactivated.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham comparator

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ultrasound not activated in the comparator side of the device.20 minutes per day of ultrasound treatment on the active side of the device. The device consists of a mouth guard type device with transducers embedded in the mouth guard. In the split mouth design, the treatment arm consist of the side of the mouth with the transducers activated while the comparator arm has the transducers deactivated.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound

The Aevo System™ is an ultrasound emitting dental device.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham comparator

Ultrasound not activated in the comparator side of the device.20 minutes per day of ultrasound treatment on the active side of the device. The device consists of a mouth guard type device with transducers embedded in the mouth guard. In the split mouth design, the treatment arm consist of the side of the mouth with the transducers activated while the comparator arm has the transducers deactivated.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Aevo System.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Subjects who meet all of the following criteria will qualify for entry into the study:

1. Scheduled to receive orthodontic treatment or in early stage of orthodontic treatment
2. Minimum of 3 mm of extraction space (on both sides of a dental arch) to be closed either by distal movement of all 6 anterior teeth from canine to canine or by distal movement of the canines.
3. Available for follow-up visits.
4. Willing and able to sign written informed consent.
5. Healthy.
6. Has permanent dentition and between the ages of 12 and 40.
7. Good oral hygiene and compliance

Exclusion Criteria

Subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:

1. Any compromised medical or dental condition that prevents the subject from participating in the trial or using the medical device.
2. Any implanted assistive devices.
3. Currently involved in any other study.
4. Lives significantly outside the clinical trial site.
5. Use of bisphosphonates.
6. Pregnant females .
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

40 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

SmileSonica Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tarek El-Bialy, PhD, FRCD(C)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Alberta, Department of Dentistry

Kevin L Knowlton, DDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto

Bryan D Tompson, DDS, FRCD(C)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto

Terry Carlyle, DDS, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Strathcona Orthodontics, Edmonton

William Wiltshire, BChD, ChD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba

Tim Dumore, DMD, BS, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dr. Dumore and Team Orthodontics, Winnipeg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Site 3: Strathcona Orthodontics Clinic

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Site 1: University of Alberta, Facilty of Dentistry

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Site 4: Faculty of Dentistry, University of Manitoba

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Site 5: Dr. Dumore and Team Orthodontics

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Site 2: Faculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

197850

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

PR-0018-0031-0041

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.