Study of Affect Induction for Lab Induced Pain in Healthy Undergraduates

NCT ID: NCT05619419

Last Updated: 2023-03-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

180 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-14

Study Completion Date

2022-11-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test if a mindfulness-enhanced positive affect induction (MPAI) works well to reduce pain intensity and pain unpleasantness from a cold water pain test in undergraduate college students who do not endorse ongoing medical or mental health diagnoses. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Is the MPAI a feasible and acceptable psychological technique for managing brief pain?
* Does the MPAI work well to reduce pain intensity and unpleasantness from experimentally induced brief pain, compared to those using a breathing meditation or those instructed to respond naturally.
* Does using the MPAI work well to improve confidence in self-managing brief pain?

Participants will be asked to complete questionnaires about their sleep, pain beliefs, and emotions after consenting to participate and at the end of the study session. They will then be randomized to either:

* Use the MPAI for managing pain induced by a cold water test (placing their hand in a container of cold water kept at approximately 5 degrees Celsius).
* Use a breathing meditation for managing pain induced by a cold water test (placing their hand in a container of cold water kept at approximately 5 degrees Celsius).
* Respond naturally to pain induced by a cold water test (placing their hand in a container of cold water kept at approximately 5 degrees Celsius).

Researchers will compare the MPAI group to the breathing meditation and natural response groups to see if the MPAI group reports less pain from the cold water test and

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The purpose of the study is to assess the following aims:

Aim 1: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of a mindfulness-enhanced positive affect induction (MPAI) for improving the experience of experimentally-induced pain.

Aim 2: Examine the efficacy of the MPAI in reducing pain intensity and increasing pain tolerance.

Aim 3: Examine change in self-efficacy in pain management from before and after using the MPAI.

Recruitment:

Participants will be recruited via the University of Colorado (CU) Denver Psychology Participant Pool website (Sona system), a resource for undergraduate Psychology students to participate in research projects. Interested participants will be provided inclusion/exclusion criteria and instructed to register for a study session only if they meet those criteria. Inclusion/exclusion criteria will be confirmed by study research assistants (RAs) during the informed consent process. Participants will receive course credit for participation in the study. If students do not wish to participate in the study, an alternative assignment will be available for equal credit.

The target population will consist of a convenience sample of healthy undergraduate students at CU Denver. While this population does not generalize to populations with chronic pain, as this is the first study of this particular affect induction for pain, the primary goal is to assess general feasibility and efficacy, which may influence future research specific to chronic pain populations. The population will be randomized into three experimental groups: MPAI, breathing meditation (BM), and natural response (NR). The BM and NR groups will serve active comparison and control groups respectively. Each group will consist of 46 participants (N=138) based on power analyses accounting for medium effects found in similar studies. Final power analyses were conducted for planned ANCOVAs with f = 0.27, alpha = 0.05, and power = 0.80.

Phone screening will occur in instances in which participants contact study personnel via methods other than CU Denver's Sona system (e.g., via phone or email). Screening questions will not go beyond inclusion criteria listed on an approved study advertisement. No information will be recorded on specific inclusion/exclusion criteria met. Additionally, participants do not provide specific medical details during the consent process. Participants only indicate if they do or do not meet all inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Study Procedures:

Participants will come into the laboratory, provide informed consent, be randomized to one of three groups (natural response, breathing meditation, or positive affect induction) and will complete forms and questionnaires on demographics, sleep quality, positive and negative affect, present-moment affect, pain catastrophizing, mood states (e.g., anger and fatigue), present-moment anxiety, and self-efficacy of pain management. Participants will then receive instructions and practice for their randomized group assignment (e.g., on how to use the positive affect induction). Participants will then complete a cold pressor task (CPT) while using the strategy they were instructed to use (i.e., naturally responding, using breathing meditation, or using the positive affect induction). Importantly, participants will be instructed to begin with their strategy 5 minutes prior to beginning the CPT, to ensure the strategy may have an effect during the CPT, which has a maximum duration of 5 minutes. Participants will then complete a final brief questionnaire rating their pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, present moment affect, self-efficacy of pain management, and feasibility and acceptability of the strategy used.

The CPT is an acute pain task wherein participants put their hand in a cold-water bath. Ice packs will be used within the water bucket to maintain a temperature no greater than 41.0 degrees Fahrenheit (5 degrees Celsius), and participants will have their hand in the water for no greater than five minutes (a maximum time limit of five minutes will be set to prevent any adverse, hypothermic effects from the cold water). The participant will provide both subjective (self-report pain intensity and unpleasantness) and objective (observation of/timed contact with water) measures from the acute pain task. Self-report measures will be taken directly following the CPT. Pain tolerance will be measured via timing when participants remove their hand from the water. The participants will be timed for how long they keep their hand in the water (observation of contact).

Data Collection \& Management:

Electronic case report forms and study data management will be performed using the REDCap Study Data Management System through the Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI) Informatics Core. REDCap is a HIPAA-compliant research data management system developed at Vanderbilt University and deployed at over 1500 institutions. At CU Denver-Anschutz, REDCap is supported by the Office of Information Technology's Development and Informatics Service Center (DISC) and the CCTSI Informatics Core. The CU Denver REDCap installation has passed a rigorous 6-week security threat analysis performed by the CU Denver-Anschutz HIPAA Security Officer. All study data are stored on a secure database server which is separate from the web-facing server -- a best-practices for internet-based security. All user access requires unique user accounts and passwords. All user actions are recorded in a secure audit log. The database server is routinely backed-up. All security patches and application updates are applied immediately upon release by DISC.

Unanticipated Problems/Adverse Events Reporting:

Unanticipated problems and adverse events will be reported to the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board within 5 days of an event.

Statistical Analysis Plan:

Data quality checks will be performed to ensure data included in analyses are interpretable, consistent, and within range.

Manipulation Checks:

To assess whether the affect induction and breathing meditation increase positive affect, paired t-tests will be conducted on present-moment affect measures from baseline and post-CPT questionnaires.

Aim 1 To assess feasibility, a one-way ANOVA will be run between groups as a manipulation check for MPAI efficacy. Means, standard deviations, and percentages will additionally be calculated for feasibility and acceptability items. Good feasibility and acceptability will be considered by an a priori threshold of high participant mean ratings (≥80%) for each item.

Aim 2 To assess efficacy of the MPAI on pain from the CPT, one-way ANCOVAs will be calculated to analyze omnibus between-group effects for each pain measure (i.e., for CPT pain tolerance, intensity, and unpleasantness). Post-hoc comparisons will then be calculated to determine specific group differences (e.g., PA vs BM, PA vs NR, and BM vs NR). Correlation analyses will be run on all covariates, to assess for multicollinearity prior to inclusion in ANCOVA analyses. Covariates to be analyzed include: Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) sleep disturbance (past seven days), PANAS (positive and negative affect past seven days), baseline present-moment affect, pain catastrophizing, present-moment anxiety, baseline PBQ (self-efficacy of pain management), gender, and meditation experience.

Aim 3 To assess for change in self-efficacy in pain management, a paired t-test will be calculated between baseline and post-CPT PBQ scores. A linear mixed model will additionally be calculated to assess change differences between groups; however, as the primary goal of Aim 3 is not to assess between group changes in pain management self-efficacy, this will be an exploratory analysis.

Study Hypotheses:

Aim1. Hypothesis 1. It is hypothesized that the mindfulness-enhanced positive affect induction will have good feasibility and acceptability for improving the experience of experimentally induced pain, based on an a priori threshold of ≥80% mean ratings on related measures.

Aim 2. Hypothesis 1. Compared to the BM and NR groups, the MPAI will result in significantly greater pain tolerance, less pain intensity, and less pain unpleasantness in relation to the experimentally induced pain.

Aim 3. Hypothesis 1. Self-efficacy in pain management will significantly increase from baseline to post-CPT, for the MPAI and BM groups.

Hypothesis 2. A repeated measures ANOVA will show increased PBQ scores for the MPAI and BM groups; however, no changes in PBQ

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Meditation Pain Mindfulness Affect Emotion Regulation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Participants will be randomized to one of three groups: mindfulness-enhanced positive affect induction (MPAI), breathing meditation (BM), or natural response (NR). Pain will be induced via a cold pressor test (CPT), as the CPT can closely resemble tonic increasing pain similar to that of pain flares. Participants will be instructed to either respond naturally, use the MPAI, or breathing meditation for managing pain during the CPT. Relevant pain related outcomes and covariates will be assessed via baseline and post-CPT questionnaires. The MPAI is the primary intervention being examined, with the BM and NR groups as active comparison and control groups respectively.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Research assistant will be aware of participant randomization, as necessary for providing the correct study instructions and procedures (e.g., pain psycho-education and meditation audio recording). Participants will not be masked, as they will receive specific instructions on and audio recorded meditation practice based on their group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mindfulness-enhanced positive affect induction (MPAI)

The MPAI is a method of bringing mindful (nonjudgmental) awareness to positive emotions, thoughts, and memories and is not expected to result in adverse experiences. It includes beginning with mindful awareness of the breath (i.e., meditation focusing on the breath) to draw attention away from negative aspects of pain. With continued awareness of the breath, smiling and gentle laughter are begun in order to initiate positive affect. With continued smiling and laughter, participants then imagine the smiles and laughter of those they are fond of, to allow a positive affect state to build upon itself and trigger state dependent positive memories, thoughts, emotions (e.g., gratitude) and self-efficacy of pain management.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Mindfulness-enhanced positive affect induction

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive brief psychoeducation about biopsychosocial pain management and practice with the MPAI via guided audio recording. They will then listen to the audio recording a final time before beginning the cold pressor test for experimental pain induction. They will be instructed to continue using the MPAI to manage pain during the cold pressor test.

Breathing meditation (BM)

Breathing meditation is a method of bringing mindful (nonjudgmental) awareness to various aspects of the breath and is aimed toward attaining a neutral state of affect and is not expected to result in adverse experiences. It involves bringing present-moment focused, nonjudgmental awareness to aspects breathing, such as sensations of airflow with each inhalation and exhalation, as well noticing the rise and expansion of the chest and belly with each inhalation. The use of breathing mediation will serve as a comparison task for the MPAI.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Breathing Meditation

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive brief psychoeducation about biopsychosocial pain management and practice with the BM via guided audio recording. They will then listen to the audio recording a final time before beginning the cold pressor test for experimental pain induction. They will be instructed to continue using the BM to manage pain during the cold pressor test.

Natural Response (NR)

Participants instructed to respond naturally to the cold pressor test will be instructed to not attempt to modify or control their experience (e.g., via distraction or use of meditation). Natural response will serve as a control comparator for the MPAI and is not expected to result in adverse experiences.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mindfulness-enhanced positive affect induction

Participants will receive brief psychoeducation about biopsychosocial pain management and practice with the MPAI via guided audio recording. They will then listen to the audio recording a final time before beginning the cold pressor test for experimental pain induction. They will be instructed to continue using the MPAI to manage pain during the cold pressor test.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Breathing Meditation

Participants will receive brief psychoeducation about biopsychosocial pain management and practice with the BM via guided audio recording. They will then listen to the audio recording a final time before beginning the cold pressor test for experimental pain induction. They will be instructed to continue using the BM to manage pain during the cold pressor test.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MPAI BM

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* University of Colorado Students
* Age 18-65
* Fluent in written and spoken English

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of an untreated mood or psychiatric disorder
* Presence of a current chronic pain condition
* Presence or history of Reynaud's syndrome, peripheral neuropathy, or unstable heart condition (including myocardial infarction, abnormal heart rhythms, or hypertension)
* Current use of prescription pain medication, high-dose anti-psychotics, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), benzodiazepines, or gabapentin
* Day-of over the counter pain medication use
* Marijuana, Cannabidiol (CBD), or psilocybin use within three days of study participation (recency of use assessed via self-report)
* Food, caffeine, and nicotine are not to be had within 30 minutes of cold pressor test (nicotine patch not exclusionary due to stable/consistent state).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Colorado, Denver

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dustin S Goerlitz, MA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Amy Wachholtz, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tonelli ME, Wachholtz AB. Meditation-based treatment yielding immediate relief for meditation-naive migraineurs. Pain Manag Nurs. 2014 Mar;15(1):36-40. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2012.04.002. Epub 2012 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24602422 (View on PubMed)

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18929686 (View on PubMed)

Darnall BD, Sturgeon JA, Kao MC, Hah JM, Mackey SC. From Catastrophizing to Recovery: a pilot study of a single-session treatment for pain catastrophizing. J Pain Res. 2014 Apr 25;7:219-26. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S62329. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24851056 (View on PubMed)

Mitchell LA, MacDonald RA, Brodie EE. Temperature and the cold pressor test. J Pain. 2004 May;5(4):233-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.03.004.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15162346 (View on PubMed)

Rokke PD, al Absi M, Lall R, Oswald K. When does a choice of coping strategies help? The interaction of choice and locus of control. J Behav Med. 1991 Oct;14(5):491-504. doi: 10.1007/BF00845106.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1744911 (View on PubMed)

Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3397865 (View on PubMed)

1. Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychological Assessment. 2009;7(4):524-532. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.524

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Yu L, Buysse DJ, Germain A, Moul DE, Stover A, Dodds NE, Johnston KL, Pilkonis PA. Development of short forms from the PROMIS sleep disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks. Behav Sleep Med. 2011 Dec 28;10(1):6-24. doi: 10.1080/15402002.2012.636266.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22250775 (View on PubMed)

Curran S, Andrykowski M, Studts J. Short Form of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-SF): Psychometric information. Psychological Assessment. Published online March 1995. Accessed January 11, 2020. https://www.academia.edu/1578109/Short_Form_of_the_Profile_of_Mood_States_POMS-SF_Psychometric_information

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-0030

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Student Anxiety & Stress Study
NCT03986125 COMPLETED NA
Stress and Sleep Study
NCT05218109 COMPLETED NA
Cyclical Sighing for Pain
NCT06292793 COMPLETED NA
Mindful Waiting Room
NCT05433636 RECRUITING NA