Fluid Responseveness in Sepsis and Its Correlation to CVP
NCT ID: NCT05612529
Last Updated: 2023-01-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
45 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-04-01
2022-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Carotid Ultrasounds Measurements in Septic Shock
NCT05444621
Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness in Paediatric Patients With Septic Shock Using Carotid Doppler Ultrasonography and Echocardiography
NCT07136532
Timing of Preload Responsiveness in Sepsis
NCT05627817
The Effect of CUGP Fluid Management in Patients With Sepsis or Septic Shock
NCT06879249
Ultrasound Optimization of Initial Fluid Challenge in Sepsis
NCT04028102
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
However, studies have shown that not every patient benefits from aggressive intravenous hydration (2).
Previous studies have shown that certain parameters may correlate with volume status and others may not to correlate with patient volume status.
Hemodynamic parameters, such as stroke volume variation (SVV) and pleth variability index (PVI) may better predict fluid responsiveness. However, assessments of these parameters require invasive procedures and special monitoring equipment, which limits their clinical application (4).
Echocardiography has been widely adopted to diagnose and monitor cardiac dysfunction leading to hemodynamic instability, and shock pathophysiology in general.
However, the echocardiographic information on macro-hemodynamics is partial, especially as being indirect as concerns vascular tone, and not allowing any inference on end-organ perfusion (5).
Recently, ultrasonography for estimating volume status has been widely recommended because of its non-invasive nature, ease of acquisition, and reproducibility of measurements.
The inferior vena cava (IVC) is a compliant vessel whose size and shape vary with changes in CVP and intravascular volume. Therefore, sonographic measurement of the IVC represents an effective and non-invasive method of estimating CVP.
Respiratory variation in the IVC diameter was used as a guide for fluid therapy in septic shock in both spontaneous breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.
Moreover, the assessment of visceral end-organ perfusion by ultrasound, may offer insights into this facet of shock pathophysiology (5).
Among these ultrasound modalities, corrected flow time (FTc) measured in the carotid artery is a new approach for predicting fluid responsiveness that has shown promising results.
Therefore, although it is a dynamic index, it may be able to adequately evaluate volume status in spontaneously and mechanically breathing patients.
Aim of the work: 1- To evaluate whether carotid FTc as determined by Doppler ultrasound could be a predictor of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated patients.
2- To evaluate the predictive ability of ΔVpeak for fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients.
3- To detect changes of regional splanchnic hemodynamics by color Doppler resistive index, and its improvement after fluid administration.
4- To evaluate the predictive ability of IVC collapsibility and distensibility indices for fluid responsiveness in septic shock patients.
5- To compare between the predictive ability of the measured Ultrasonographic parameters and the CVP changes in response to intravenous fluid therapy in both spontaneously breathing and mechanically ventilated septic shock patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
US , Echocardiography
* Carotid ultrasonography: Parameters will be measured by single blinded independent examiner using an ultrasound device. Baseline carotid FTc, ΔVpeak, will be measured.
* Echocardiography: Stroke Volume will be measured by transthoracic echocardiography.
* Renal and splenic Doppler resistivity index.
* Inferior vena cava collapsibility and distensibility indices.
* Central venous pressure estimation by central venous catheter, and central - Lung ultrasound for detection of lung congestion
* Lung ultrasound for detection of lung congestion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. septic shocked patients show signs of acute circulatory failure at any time within the first 72 hours.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of heart failure or patient known to have moderate to severe valvular heart disease, congenital heart disease.
3. The presence of carotid artery stenosis \>50% , newly detected common carotid stenosis \>50% during the study period.
4. Non-sinus rhythm.
5. Moderate to severe anemia.
6. Markedly increased intraabdominal pressure as abdominal compartment syndrome, pregnancy.
7. Medically diseased kidneys, ureteric obstruction peri-nephric collection.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tasneem Hassan Younes
Assistant lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
olfat M elshinawy, professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
mohamed M abdelhady, professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
arafa M aboelhassan
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tasneem Hassan Younes
Asyut, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jun;44(6):925-928. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5085-0. Epub 2018 Apr 19. No abstract available.
Vandervelden S, Malbrain ML. Initial resuscitation from severe sepsis: one size does not fit all. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47 Spec No:s44-55. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2015.0075. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Lammi MR, Aiello B, Burg GT, Rehman T, Douglas IS, Wheeler AP, deBoisblanc BP; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Network Investigators. Response to fluid boluses in the fluid and catheter treatment trial. Chest. 2015 Oct;148(4):919-926. doi: 10.1378/chest.15-0445.
Hu B, Xiang H, Liang H, Yu L, Xu T, Yang JH, DU ZH, Li JG. Assessment effect of central venous pressure in fluid resuscitation in the patients with shock: a multi-center retrospective research. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(10):1844-9.
Corradi F, Via G, Tavazzi G. What's new in ultrasound-based assessment of organ perfusion in the critically ill: expanding the bedside clinical monitoring window for hypoperfusion in shock. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Apr;46(4):775-779. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05791-y. Epub 2019 Oct 25. No abstract available.
Kim HJ, Choi YS, Kim SH, Lee W, Kwon JY, Kim DH. Predictability of preoperative carotid artery-corrected flow time for hypotension after spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing caesarean section: A prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Apr 1;38(4):394-401. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001376.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
fluid responseveness in sepsis
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.