Impact of the Experience of Anaesthetists in Changing Ventilation Strategies During Panendoscopy on the Incidence of Intraoperative Hypoxaemia
NCT ID: NCT05601570
Last Updated: 2024-02-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
850 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-04-10
2024-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Mainly studied in ENT surgery because of the interest that this oxygenation strategy presents with the absence of recourse to oro-tracheal intubation (OTI), several authors will use it in the framework of micro-laryngoscopy surgery in suspension. However, its use as an oxygenation strategy during panendoscopy has been little explored. Panendoscopy is a common procedure that requires deep and short anesthesia. The main challenge is the sharing of the airway between the anesthesia team and the surgical team. Learning to use this new method or the impact of operator experience has never been explored.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The 90% Effective Flow of High Flow Nasal Oxygenation (HFNO) During Sedated Bronchoscopy
NCT05298319
Effects of Different Ventilatory Strategy During Bronchoscopy
NCT05956301
High Flow Nasal OXygen Therapy in High Risk Patients of Hypoxia Undergoing Diagnostic BRONCHOscopy
NCT01650974
Non Invasive Ventilation Combined to High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen for Preoxygenation of Hypoxemic ICU Patients
NCT02530957
HFNC and Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
NCT04109560
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Mechanical ventilation with oro-tracheal intubation (OTI)
* Face mask ventilation (FMV)
* Jet ventilation
* HFNO Each of these methods has advantages and disadvantages, which explains why there are no clear recommendations to date on the preferred anesthesia and oxygenation technique. Regardless of the method chosen, the risks remain significant for the patient, particularly the risk of hypoxemia during a desaturation episode.
For several years, the strategy of oxygenation during panendoscopy and the number of practitioners performing this procedure has evolved in our centre.
* 2017, with the arrival of the HFNO in the operating room.
* 2020, during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic, changes in the organisation of the anaesthesiology department had to take place and the number of practitioners performing this procedure increased significantly.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the evolution periods of the oxygenation strategies and the experience of the operators on the incidence of patients with at least one intra-procedural hypoxemia (SpO2 \< 90% for more than one minute).
All patients who had a panendoscopy from 01 January 2015 to 31 December 2020 were analysed. The anaesthetists in our centre are divided into different practice specialties, so a small number of them regularly perform anaesthesia in ENT surgery. We divided the anaesthetists who performed panendoscopies during the study period into two categories in order to compare the incidence of severe hypoxaemia (SpO2 \< 90%) among them :
* Experienced anaesthetists (practitioner who has performed at least 30 panendoscopies per year for two consecutive years)
* Non-experienced anaesthetists (practitioner who has performed at least one panendoscopy per year and does not meet the criteria for expertise)
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Ferreira
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon
Besançon, Franche Comté, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ID020621HFNO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.