Safety Study of Non-invasive Ventilation Versus High-flow Oxygen in Patients With Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Undergoing Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy.

NCT ID: NCT01870765

Last Updated: 2020-11-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Bronchoscopy with broncho-alveolar lavage is a diagnostic tool in patients with pneumonia. Especially patients with acute or chronic pulmonary diseases are at risk of respiratory failure during or after bronchoscopy. It is known that in these cases bronchoscopy can be performed safely using non-invasive ventilation. It seems probable that high-flow oxygen, which is used in the treatment of patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure, is equally effective in preventing the development of respiratory failure during fiberoptic bronchoscopy while improving patient comfort. In this prospective randomised study the safety of high-flow oxygen is compared with non-invasive ventilation in patients with hypoxemic respiratory failure undergoing fiberoptic bronchoscopy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Respiratory Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

non-invasive ventilation

Performance of bronchoscopy during non-invasive ventilation.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

non-invasive ventilation

Intervention Type DEVICE

non-invasive ventilation via face mask

fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fiberoptic bronchoscopy including broncho-alveolar lavage

high-flow oxygen

Performance of bronchoscopy during high-flow oxygen therapy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

high-flow oxygen

Intervention Type DEVICE

high-flow oxygen via nasal cannula

fiberoptic bronchoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

fiberoptic bronchoscopy including broncho-alveolar lavage

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

non-invasive ventilation

non-invasive ventilation via face mask

Intervention Type DEVICE

high-flow oxygen

high-flow oxygen via nasal cannula

Intervention Type DEVICE

fiberoptic bronchoscopy

fiberoptic bronchoscopy including broncho-alveolar lavage

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients treated in an intensive care unit
* indication for bronchoscopy and broncho-alveolar lavage
* presence of hypoxemic (SaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2): 300 or less) and/or hypercapnic respiratory failure

Exclusion Criteria

* patients already on invasive ventilation
* indication for intubation
* blocked nasopharynx
* contraindications for non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefan Kluge

PD Dr. Stefan Kluge

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Intensive Care Medicine

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Simon M, Braune S, Frings D, Wiontzek AK, Klose H, Kluge S. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen versus non-invasive ventilation in patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure undergoing flexible bronchoscopy--a prospective randomised trial. Crit Care. 2014 Dec 22;18(6):712. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0712-9.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25529351 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PV-4442

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id