Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-12-01
2024-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimal Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Median Sternotomy Approach
NCT03195595
Transseptal Approach Versus Conventional Left Atrial Approach for Mitral Valve Procedures
NCT04078100
Treatment of Moderate FMR During AVR
NCT05566340
Minimally Invasive Rheumatic Mitral Valve Surgery
NCT05270590
Efficacy of Limited Right Anterior Thoracotomy Versus Median Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Replacement
NCT06869980
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Since minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MMVS) was first described in the mid-to-late 1990s by pioneer surgeons Alain Carpentier and Randolph Chitwood, the techniques have evolved to include mini-thoracotomy, port-access thoracoscopic, partial sternotomy, and robotic. Right lateral mini-thoracotomy has become the standard approach for mitral valve surgery in many centers. These approaches may result in less surgical trauma, blood transfusions, and pain, thereby leading to a shorter hospital stay and faster return to daily activities. A reduction in postoperative hemorrhage and transfusion requirements have been suggested as a potential advantage of minimally invasive valve surgery. This benefit is important given the significant morbidity and mortality associated with transfusions and re-exploration for bleeding. Observational studies suggested that patients undergoing MMVS required fewer units of pRBCs transfused per patient and patients were at lower risk of transfusion. RCTs did not reach statistical significance. So, more studies were required to reach a definite conclusion.
Through this study our aim is to evaluate postoperative bleeding and needs for blood transfusion in conventional median sternotomy mitral valve replacement in comparison to minimally invasive approach.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MVR through Median sternotomy
Mitral valve replacement
Mitral valve replacement through median sternotomy and minimally invasive approach
MVR through Minimally invasive approach
Mitral valve replacement
Mitral valve replacement through median sternotomy and minimally invasive approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mitral valve replacement
Mitral valve replacement through median sternotomy and minimally invasive approach
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mustafa Loay Mohammed
Resident Doctor
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nishimura RA, Vahanian A, Eleid MF, Mack MJ. Mitral valve disease--current management and future challenges. Lancet. 2016 Mar 26;387(10025):1324-34. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00558-4.
Carpentier A, Loulmet D, Carpentier A, Le Bret E, Haugades B, Dassier P, Guibourt P. [Open heart operation under videosurgery and minithoracotomy. First case (mitral valvuloplasty) operated with success]. C R Acad Sci III. 1996 Mar;319(3):219-23. French.
Sundermann SH, Sromicki J, Rodriguez Cetina Biefer H, Seifert B, Holubec T, Falk V, Jacobs S. Mitral valve surgery: right lateral minithoracotomy or sternotomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Nov;148(5):1989-1995.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.01.046. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
Al Otaibi A, Gupta S, Belley-Cote EP, Alsagheir A, Spence J, Parry D, Whitlock RP. Mini-thoracotomy vs. conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Jun;58(3):489-496. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09603-8. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
Modi P, Hassan A, Chitwood WR Jr. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):943-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.07.057. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
Eqbal AJ, Gupta S, Basha A, Qiu Y, Wu N, Rega F, Chu FV, Belley-Cote EP, Whitlock RP. Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery versus conventional sternotomy mitral valve surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 119 studies. J Card Surg. 2022 May;37(5):1319-1327. doi: 10.1111/jocs.16314. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Bleeding in MVR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.