Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Approach: Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes.
NCT ID: NCT05504109
Last Updated: 2022-08-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-01
2023-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Technically MIMVS is more complex, requires a special learning curve and associated with higher Incidence of neurological events, aortic dissection, groin complications and infection despite all these benefits . MIVS also has controversies among cardiac surgeons, because it makes the exposure worse and requires a more complex surgery, which may lead to a less satisfying effect
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Minimal Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement Versus Conventional Median Sternotomy Approach
NCT03195595
Efficacy of Limited Right Anterior Thoracotomy Versus Median Sternotomy for Mitral Valve Replacement
NCT06869980
Minimally Invasive Rheumatic Mitral Valve Surgery
NCT05270590
Comparison of Early Postoperative Outcomes Between Minimally Invasive Valve Surgery Via Right Thoracotomy and Conventional Valve Surgery Via Sternotomy.
NCT07251660
Bleeding and Blood Transfusion in MVR
NCT05594420
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A
patients who will undergo mitral valve replacement through full sternotomy approach
mitral valve replacement through full sternotomy approach.
compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach
Group B
patients who will undergo mitral valve replacement through right mini thoracotomy approach
mitral valve replacement through right mini thoracotomy approach.
compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mitral valve replacement through full sternotomy approach.
compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach
mitral valve replacement through right mini thoracotomy approach.
compare between Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Replacement and Conventional Approach
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Emergency mitral valve replacement (non-rheumatic cases).
* Patients who have combined other valve diseases e.g. (severe Aortic Regurgitation).
* Patients need Tricuspid valve repair or replacement.
* Severely calcified mitral valve disease (mitral annular calcification).
20 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sohag University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
abdelhamed alaaeldin ali
Assistant lecture of cardiothoracic surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sohag University Hospital
Sohag, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
khaled m abdelaal, professor
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Osama R ELsheref, professor
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Joshi P, Doshi C, Vinchurkar M, Thosani R, Sagar P, Mahajan V. Minimally invasive combined aortic and mitral valve replacement. Heart Lung Circ. 2011 Apr;20(4):231-3. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2010.10.072. Epub 2010 Dec 10.
Schmitto JD, Mokashi SA, Cohn LH. Minimally-invasive valve surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 3;56(6):455-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.053.
Falk V, Cheng DC, Martin J, Diegeler A, Folliguet TA, Nifong LW, Perier P, Raanani E, Smith JM, Seeburger J. Minimally invasive versus open mitral valve surgery: a consensus statement of the international society of minimally invasive coronary surgery (ISMICS) 2010. Innovations (Phila). 2011 Mar;6(2):66-76. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e318216be5c.
Vollroth M, Seeburger J, Garbade J, Borger MA, Misfeld M, Mohr FW. Conversion rate and contraindications for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov;2(6):853-4. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2225-319X.2013.10.15. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Soh-Med-22-08-12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.