Evaluation of the Functional Outcome of Hero Arm Prosthesis in Children After One Year of Use.
NCT ID: NCT05579002
Last Updated: 2022-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-02
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main objective is to Identify the functional difficulties encountered by the child related to the agenesis and which could be improved by wearing this prosthesis.
The investigators will include children born between 2006 and 2012 with a unilateral upper limb malformation. These children are regularly followed at Reference Center for Limb Malformations (CEREFAM) at the Saint-Maurice Hospitals (HSM) for a unilateral upper limb deformity. CEREFAM is currently following a large cohort of children with malformations including 143 children with transverse forearm agenesis. Of these, approximately 10% have been prescribed a Hero Arm prosthesis.
After the delivery of the Hero Arm, they are followed up in occupational therapy at HSM to learn how to use the prosthesis. This training lasts two days with an evaluation (T0). This assessment includes:
* three questionnaires: the Canadian Measure of Occupational Performance (CMOP), a version of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) that has been modified to fit the child, and a questionnaire completed by the CEREFAM.
* two analytical and functional tests: the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) and the modified 400-point assessment.
The same assessment will be performed after one year of wearing the prosthesis (T1).
This is a observational and non-interventional study. No changes have been made to the usual follow-up of the patient.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Medical Economic Evaluation of Bilateral Allograft of Hands and Forearms
NCT02797457
Observational Study of People with Complete Hand Amputation Using a Multi-grip Myoelectric Prosthesis a Following Using a Standard Myoelectric Prosthesis
NCT06452472
Several Studys Showed That Upper Limb Amputated Patients Are Able to Experience the Illusion of the Rubber Hand Whith Prosthesis: We Want to go Futher by Comparing the Strength of the Incorporation According to the Type of Prosthesis Using the Illusion of the Rubber Hand With Prothesis
NCT05931198
Motor Parameters in Patients With Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy
NCT04772027
Clinical Evaluation of Bilateral Hand Allograft: Pilot Study of 7 Cases
NCT02800434
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In general, with the French administration, people with TFA are not considered to be disabled. However, this malformation can have a functional impact with limitations in certain activities of daily living and in the practice of specific activities (sports, music...). Socially, some patients present a desire to be "unnoticed", especially during adolescence and early adulthood, when entering professional life, for fear of discrimination in hiring. On the other hand, some patients display their malformation and even make it their "trademark".
Currently, agenesis patients are treated by multidisciplinary teams who propose a prosthesis. The prosthesis is not indispensable, patients live with their malformation since birth and are autonomous in their daily life. There are 3 categories of prostheses: aesthetic prostheses, functional prostheses and tool prostheses.
The Hero Arm prosthesis, belonging to the functional prostheses, is the first and only bionic myoelectric prosthesis reimbursed in France for children by the Social Security since 2019. This prosthesis is designed by 3D printing by Open Bionics in England. It is a prosthesis that has a lower cost than other prostheses available on the market, which is not negligible due to the growth of the child, requiring the change of prosthesis annually. The price of a Hero Arm prosthesis is around 12,000 to 15,000 euros. This prosthesis is a departure from traditional aesthetic prosthesis models and is closer to "superhero" type prostheses. In addition, there is a variety of colors available and the appearance can be customized by the children.
Until now, no study has been done on the functional results of the Hero Arm prosthesis in à pediatric context in France.
This is the first study on the use of a new bionic myoelectric prosthesis in children in France, retrospective, allowing to evaluate the service rendered by the medical device and the impact on the quality of life of these children with congenital amputation of the forearm. This study is based on the patients of the Reference Center for Limb Malformations (CEREFAM).
Beyond the functional aspect, this study will allow to frame the prescription of this prosthesis by analyzing the service rendered for the child and their family.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Children with unilateral upper limb malformation
Children born between 2006 and 2012, with a unilateral upper limb deformity. These children are regularly followed at CEREFAM for a unilateral upper limb deformity. During their follow-up, they were fitted with different upper limb prostheses. During a consultation with one of the CEREFAM physicians, they requested a Hero Arm prosthesis following the marketing and reimbursement in France in 2019.
Questionnaires and tests
Application of three questionnaires:
1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (CORM),
2. a version of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) modified for the child
3. a questionnaire developed by CEREFAM
* Two analytical and functional tests:
1\) the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) 2) modified 400-point assessment.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Questionnaires and tests
Application of three questionnaires:
1. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (CORM),
2. a version of the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (DASH) modified for the child
3. a questionnaire developed by CEREFAM
* Two analytical and functional tests:
1\) the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) 2) modified 400-point assessment.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Children with a unilateral upper limb deformity
* Children with a Hero Arm bionic myoelectric prosthesis, with or without another prosthesis
* Children and parents who speak and understand French
* No objection to data collection
Exclusion Criteria
* Children with cognitive disorders who are not able to learn to use a myoelectric prosthesis
7 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hopitaux de Saint-Maurice
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nathaly QUINTERO-PRIGENT, Doctor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Centre de Référence pour les Anomalies des Membres (CEREFAM)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hôpitaux de Saint-Maurice
Saint-Maurice, Île-de-France Region, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Jong IG, Reinders-Messelink HA, Janssen WG, Poelma MJ, van Wijk I, van der Sluis CK. Mixed feelings of children and adolescents with unilateral congenital below elbow deficiency: an online focus group study. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e37099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037099. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
Kerver N, van Twillert S, Maas B, van der Sluis CK. User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results. PLoS One. 2020 Jun 30;15(6):e0234342. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234342. eCollection 2020.
Widehammar C, Pettersson I, Janeslatt G, Hermansson L. The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018 Feb;42(1):28-36. doi: 10.1177/0309364617704801. Epub 2017 May 4.
Cordella F, Ciancio AL, Sacchetti R, Davalli A, Cutti AG, Guglielmelli E, Zollo L. Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users. Front Neurosci. 2016 May 12;10:209. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2016.00209. eCollection 2016.
Manero A, Smith P, Sparkman J, Dombrowski M, Courbin D, Kester A, Womack I, Chi A. Implementation of 3D Printing Technology in the Field of Prosthetics: Past, Present, and Future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 10;16(9):1641. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16091641.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEREFAM-EFPHA-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.