Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-11-01
2026-03-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
\- Does upper extremity function differ between bionic and myoelectric hands?
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does upper extremity function differ between bionic and myoelectric hands?
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Standard Myoelectric Hand and Bionic Hand Use in Individuals With Upper Limb Amputation
NCT06684730
Evaluation of Satisfaction and Effect on Daily Living Activities With the Use of Myoelectric Controlled Prosthesis
NCT05261178
Robot-assisted Exercise in Patients With Amputation Using Myoelectric Prosthesis
NCT04030585
Evaluation of a Non-invasive Sensory Feedback System in Hand Prostheses
NCT03876405
Comparison of Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputees' Posture Parameters
NCT04456244
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Bionic Prosthetic Hand Group
Participants use advanced myoelectric prosthetic hands with multi-articulating structures and enhanced control features designed to improve functional performance.These devices are designed to enhance hand function, dexterity, and user interaction beyond conventional myoelectric control.
No interventions assigned to this group
Myoelectric Prosthetic Hand Group
Participants in this group are individuals with upper limb amputation who use a myoelectric prosthetic hand controlled by surface electromyographic signals from residual limb muscles. These devices provide electrically powered hand movement and basic grasp functions without advanced bionic or sensor-integrated features.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Individuals with unilateral upper limb amputation
* Regular use of a prosthetic device for at least 6 months
* Use of a semi-electronic elbow joint prosthetic component
* Ability to understand and complete study assessments
Exclusion Criteria
* Proximal upper limb amputation at the shoulder level or above
* Coexisting neurological or orthopedic disorders that may affect upper limb function or study outcomes
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Gulhane School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Güllü Aydın Yağcıoğlu
Asst. Prof
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Health Sciences Gülhane Faculty of Health Sciences
Ankara, Keçiören, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Carey SL, Lura DJ, Highsmith MJ; CP; FAAOP. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2015;52(3):247-62. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2014.08.0192.
Kannenberg, A., Lundstrom, R., Hibler, K. D., & Johnson, S. S. (2023). Differences in two multiarticulating myoelectric hands for facilitating activities of daily living in individuals with transradial amputation: a cross-sectional study. JPO: Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics, 35(1), 38-43.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
O&P
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.