Observational Study of People with Complete Hand Amputation Using a Multi-grip Myoelectric Prosthesis a Following Using a Standard Myoelectric Prosthesis
NCT ID: NCT06452472
Last Updated: 2024-10-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-22
2022-12-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Amputees who do not use a prosthesis or a cosmetic prosthesis appear to have more difficulties in their daily activities and a greater disability than those who use body powered or myoelectric prostheses. While theoretically a MG-MHP offers the potential for subjects to perform more natural movements than a standard MHP, clinical evidence substantiating the advantages of MG-MHP over standard MHP in daily life remains inconclusive.
It remains essential to compare the advantages of MG-MHPs versus standard MHPs regarding functionality in daily life, quality of life and overall satisfaction among subjects who agree to transition from their standard MHP to a MG-MHP. The primary objective of this study was to assess upper limb function (specifically, the upper limb function component of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey (OPUS) questionnaire) provided by a specific MG-MHP, i-Limb®, compared to a standard MHP in subjects with complete hand amputation.
The subjects participating in the study were patients equipped with MHP, coming to the center for a MG-MHPs hand test. If the prescription for the MG-MHPs hand was validated, the patient was then followed in the study for 8 to 10 weeks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Several Studys Showed That Upper Limb Amputated Patients Are Able to Experience the Illusion of the Rubber Hand Whith Prosthesis: We Want to go Futher by Comparing the Strength of the Incorporation According to the Type of Prosthesis Using the Illusion of the Rubber Hand With Prothesis
NCT05931198
Medical Economic Evaluation of Bilateral Allograft of Hands and Forearms
NCT02797457
A Comparison of Myoelectric and Bionic Hands
NCT07347561
Feasibility of Implantable Myoelectric Sensors to Control Upper Limb Prostheses
NCT01901081
Motor Parameters in Patients With Limb Girdle Muscular Dystrophy
NCT04772027
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
I-LIMB
Use of a multi-grip myoelectric hand prosthesis (I-LIMB after using a standard myoelectric prosthesis)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with a unilateral acquired or congenital complete amputation
* Patient using a standard myoelectric hand prosthesis for at least 4 weeks
* Patient who has an indication of a Multi-Grip Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis , according to a multidisciplinary team
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient under guardianship
* Patient with multiple amputations
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Clin-Experts
INDUSTRY
Össur Iceland ehf
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Isabelle LOIRET, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
IRR - Établissement de Nancy - Louis-Pierquin
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Multiples Facilities
Multiple Locations, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2018-A02856-49
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.