The Relationship Between Trunk Position Sense and Muscle Activation, Balance and Quality of Life in Amputees
NCT ID: NCT06046300
Last Updated: 2023-10-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-02-15
2025-10-25
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Dynamic Postural Changes in Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputees
NCT05301270
Comparison of Transtibial and Transfemoral Amputees' Posture Parameters
NCT04456244
Comparison of Transfemoral Amputees in Different Prosthesis Use Periods
NCT06773559
Comparison of Joint Position Sense in Diabetic and Traumatic Transtibial Amputees
NCT05542901
Comparison of Dual Task Gait Characteristics in Individuals With Amputation and Healty Individuals
NCT04392466
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Following lower extremity amputation, somatosensory input, muscle activity, and joint mobility decrease in the amputated part of the extremity.
The ability to maintain postural stability is one of the most important aspects of our daily lives.
While standing, the postural control system adjusts the center of pressure and gathers inputs from the visual, vestibular, and somatosensory systems (i.e. proprioceptive and cutaneous senses) to maintain the center of gravity on the base of support.
The ability to maintain balance is severely impaired following lower extremity amputation.
As the stump fails to compensate for the lack of foot and ankle as a proprioceptive organ, the postural control system is reprogrammed and compensatory mechanisms are developed to prevent weight-bearing asymmetries, somatosensory loss, reduced support surface, and increased joint stiffness.
These changes are also reflected in changes in neuromuscular motor output, such as postural sway during standing.
Although used prostheses are an alternative to partially reduce deficiencies, current prosthetic technologies do not provide enough sensory feedback.
Persons with lower extremity amputations exhibit abnormal trunk movement during functional tasks than non-injured persons.
As shown in studies, an asymmetrical posture and balance problem occurs in individuals with amputation.
The resulting asymmetry can be associated with chronic neuromuscular problems such as back and extremity pain, vascular diseases, and early arthritis.
Controlled trunk movement is essential for balance and stability while walking. Individuals with lower extremity amputations often exhibit abnormal trunk movement, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood.
Lower extremity amputation results in loss of muscles, tendons, ligaments and joint capsule, severely affecting the lower extremity and thus body function.
These structures are not only essential for movement, they also function as sensory receptors, and when lost, proprioception suffers.
It includes conscious proprioception, kinesthesia, strength sense, and joint position sense.
Several studies have investigated changes in proprioception in individuals with transtibial amputation and have presented different results.
Fontes et al. concluded that asymmetric body weight distribution was not accompanied by a decrease in knee proprioception in transtibial amputees.
Latanioti et al. They stated that when joint position sense at 15° was evaluated, stump proprioceptive knowledge was not significantly affected after knee amputation and prosthesis application, and the loss of knee sensory receptors in these individuals was compensated by alternative mechanisms.
Liao and Skinner concluded that there is a significant difference in knee joint proprioception between prosthetic and intact limbs in persons with below-knee amputation.
Eakin et al. They designed a proprioception measurement system to evaluate lower extremity knee joint proprioception in 10 above-knee amputees.
The system allowed subjects to be tested in a position simulating the late swing phase of gait.
The ability to repeat the lower extremity positions specified for the intact and prosthetic extremities of the subjects was recorded for the detection of slow passive movement.
As a result of the study, a significant difference was detected between the passive motion detection threshold of the amputated and intact extremities; however, they stated that there was no significant difference between passive motion reposition of amputated and intact extremities.
This finding demonstrates the importance of hip joint motion appreciation when these motions are relevant in the proprioception of the prosthetic knee joint of amputees.
However, prosthetic limb passive motion positioning error decreases with age, which may improve amputees' ability to use the remaining lower extremity proprioceptive mechanisms to compensate for the loss of anatomical knee joint structures.
There are many studies in the literature examining position sense, muscle activity, balance and quality of life in individuals with transtibial amputation.
However, studies have focused on the lower extremities. Individuals with transtibial amputation often have abnormal trunk movement, but the mechanisms underlying this abnormality in terms of trunk are not well understood.
Information on trunk muscle activity and trunk position sense in individuals with transtibial amputation is very limited.
In the current literature, the trunk position sense of individuals with transtibial amputation and the relationship of trunk position sense with muscle activation, balance and quality of life.
Therefore, in this study, it is aimed to investigate whether the trunk position sense, including the trunk right and left sides of the individuals with transtibial amputation, is affected and the relationship between trunk position sense and muscle activation, balance and quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Amputees
Individuals with a transtibial amputation
Investigation of the relationship between trunk position sense and muscle activation, balance and quality of life in individuals with transtibial amputation.
It is aimed to investigate whether the trunk position sense, including the trunk right and left sides of the individuals with transtibial amputation, is affected and the relationship between trunk position sense and muscle activation, balance and quality of life.
Healthy
Healthy individuals
Investigation of the relationship between trunk position sense and muscle activation, balance and quality of life in individuals with transtibial amputation.
It is aimed to investigate whether the trunk position sense, including the trunk right and left sides of the individuals with transtibial amputation, is affected and the relationship between trunk position sense and muscle activation, balance and quality of life.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Investigation of the relationship between trunk position sense and muscle activation, balance and quality of life in individuals with transtibial amputation.
It is aimed to investigate whether the trunk position sense, including the trunk right and left sides of the individuals with transtibial amputation, is affected and the relationship between trunk position sense and muscle activation, balance and quality of life.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having a traumatic unilateral transtibial amputation,
* Using prosthesis for at least 1 year,
* K2 and K3 functional classification according to K level,
* Between the ages of 18-45,
* Having received standard physiotherapy methods (prosthesis training),
* It was determined as individuals who volunteered to participate in the study. For the Healthy Group;
* Between the ages of 18-45,
* Having similar demographic characteristics with the individuals in the transtibial amputee group,
* No neurological and/or orthopedic problems,
* Individuals who agreed to participate in the study voluntarily.
Exclusion Criteria
* Having hip, knee or ankle joint limitation,
* Having muscle shortness that prevents walking and other activities,
* Having a history of falling in the last 1 year,
* Body mass index (BMI) \>30 kg/m²,
* Individuals using a walking aid. For the Amputation Group;
* Having phantom pain,
* Individuals with any disease or systemic health problem that may affect their gait other than amputation.
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Semra Topuz
PT, MSC, Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ozlem Ulger
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hacettepe University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hacettepe University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GO 21/1104
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.