The Effect of Visual Feedback on Function, Stability and Quality of Life in Transtibial Amputation
NCT ID: NCT03316248
Last Updated: 2017-10-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-01-25
2017-06-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. had transtibial amputation
2. \>18 years old
3. had total surface bearing socket at least one year
Outcome measures:
* Prosthetic weight bearing
* Berg Balance Scale
* Timed up \&go Test
* 2 Minute Walk Test
* Satisfaction of prosthesis questionnare
* Nottingham health profile
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
visual feedback
participants in the experimental group were applied usual prosthetic rehabilitation with visual feedback methods. 9 sessions for three days were applied.
visual feedback
in the study group, subjects were applied for example prosthetic weight bearing exercises in front of the mirror. They watched their reflected image while doing exercises.
Usual prosthetic rehabilitation
participants in the control group were applied usual prosthetic rehabilitation. 9 sessions for three days were applied.
usual prosthetic rehabilitation
prosthetic weight bearing and balance exercises were applied to the control group for 9 sessions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
visual feedback
in the study group, subjects were applied for example prosthetic weight bearing exercises in front of the mirror. They watched their reflected image while doing exercises.
usual prosthetic rehabilitation
prosthetic weight bearing and balance exercises were applied to the control group for 9 sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* used prosthesis with total surface bearing socket (TSB) for at least 1 year
* volunteered to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
* had any cognitive problems
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hacettepe University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elif Kırdı
Research Assistant
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elif Kırdı
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hacettepe University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hacettepe University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GO 17 / 115
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id