Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Versus Surgical Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

NCT ID: NCT05564143

Last Updated: 2022-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), defined by a mechanical obstruction of the duodenum, pylorus, or antrum, may result from various diseases. GOO was caused by underlying malignancy in up to 85% of patients, most of which could be attributed to pancreatic cancer. Malignant GOO may increase morbidity, reducing quality of life, and significantly influencing tolerability and efficacy of oncologic treatments. Before the advent of EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE), placement of enteral self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) or surgical gastroenterostomy (SGE) are the standard of care for many years. The main shortcoming of enteral SEMS placement is recurrent GOO due to tumor ingrowth/overgrowth, which occurs in the majority of patients who survive longer than 6 months. On the other hand, the main limitation of SGE is its invasive nature, especially in such patients with advanced malignancies and poor nutritional status. In addition, SGE is associated with frequent complications, such as perioperative infections and gastroparesis.

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) is a novel procedure for palliation of malignant GOO. Several systematic reviews and meta-analysis demonstrated the feasibility, efficacy and safety of EUS-GE. Compared with laparoscopic GE (LGE), EUS-GE not only had almost identical technical and clinical success but also reduced time to oral intake, shorter median hospital stay, and lower rate of adverse events. However, data directly comparing EUS-GE to LGE are limited. We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between EUS-GE and LGE in the palliation of malignant GOO under a randomized setting.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE)

All EUS-GE procedures were performed under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. A forward-viewing gastroscope or side-viewing duodenoscope is first inserted into the site of the obstruction and a 0.025- or 0.035-inch stiff GW is placed down-stream of the jejunum beyond the obstruction as far as possible. Then, oral enteral tube is placed where the jejunum intended for stent placement under fluoroscopic guidance. After exchanging to EUS endoscope, the target jejunum is visualized by EUS after continuously injection of mixed saline and contrast medium. Finally, the gastrojejunostomy stent is directly advanced from the gastric wall into the target jejunum by AXIOS-EC delivery system.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Treatment

Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy (LGE)

All LGE were performed in the operation room with patients under general anesthesia. After CO2 insufflation, 4 to 5 trocars were introduced. Next, the Treitz ligament was identified. An anterior, dorsal laterolateral, or side- to-side isoperistaltic gastroenteric anastomosis was constructed. The exact location of the gastroenteric anastomosis, with regard to the Treitz ligament, varied from 30 to 60 cm.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy (LGE)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Treatment

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE)

Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy (LGE)

Treatment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Consecutive patients ≥ 20 years old
2. Confirmed unresectable distal gastric or duodenal or pancreatico-biliary malignancies
3. Suffering from gastric outlet obstruction with a gastric outlet obstruction score of ≤ 1
4. Performance status ECOG ≤3

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unable to give informed consent
2. Prior duodenal metallic stent placement
3. Severe comorbidities precluding the endoscopic procedure or operation
4. Life expectancy of less than 1 month
5. History of gastric surgery
6. Linitus plastic
7. Multiple-level bowel obstruction confirmed on radiographic studies such as small bowel series or abdominal computed tomography
8. Coagulation disorders
9. Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Taiwan University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yu-Ting Kuo, MD, MSc

Role: CONTACT

+886-223123456 ext. 265587

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

202204110RIPA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PG Versus TG for Advanced PGC
NCT06614439 COMPLETED NA