Prophylactic EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy in Advanced Periampullary Cancers
NCT ID: NCT05994521
Last Updated: 2024-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-04-09
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main question this study aims to answer is can ProEUS-GE effectively prevent the occurrence of MGOO in patients with periampullary cancer?
Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 (ERCP alone) or Group 2 (ERCP + ProEUS-GE). The study will compare the outcomes between these groups to determine the effectiveness of ProEUS-GE in preventing MGOO.
Researchers will compare Group 1 (ERCP alone) with Group 2 (ERCP + ProEUS-GE) to see if the addition of ProEUS-GE leads to a reduced occurrence of MGOO in patients with periampullary cancer.
The primary endpoint is the rate of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EUS-guided Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT05605327
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Versus Surgical Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT05564143
Enteral Anastomosis for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy
NCT05561907
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT04810377
Comparing Endoscopic Ultrasound vs Surgical Gastrojejunostomy for Management of GOO.
NCT06128018
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The principal research question is whether ProEUS-GE can prevent the occurrence of MGOO in patients with pancreatic head cancer. We hypothesize that the addition of ProEUS-GE during ERCP reduces the rate of development of subsequent MGOO in advanced periampullary solid cancer without significantly increasing the rate of adverse events when compared to ERCP alone.
The Proposed Trial Trial Design: This is a patient- and outcome assessor-blinded multicentre randomized controlled superiority trial. The endoscopist performing the procedure will not be blinded to treatment allocation.
Planned Trial Interventions: 1) ERCP with biliary decompression + prophylactic EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (ProEUS-GE) and 2) ERCP with biliary decompression alone. All procedures will be performed by experienced endoscopists with or without trainee involvement. Following informed consent, sedation will be via conscious sedation or general anesthesia, as per existing institutional procedural protocols. A medical effectiveness approach will be adopted where only the initial randomly allocated treatment is dictated by the trial.
Participant Allocation: After confirmation of fulfillment of all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and pre-procedural consent, patients will be randomly allocated, intra-procedurally during the ERCP, to one of the two approaches.
The primary endpoint is the rate of gastric outlet obstruction.
Sample size calculation is based on the primary endpoint of MGOO considering competing risk of death. Based on the most current available literature and institutional data, we estimated a cumulative incidence rate of MGOO of 5% and 25% at 18 months in the ERCP + ProEUS-GE and ERCP alone arms, respectively. Using a two-sided log-rank test that accounts for a 35% rate of competing risk (death 30% and surgery 5%) in each group while considering a loss to follow-up of 10%, with a minimal follow-up time of 1 year, we calculated that a sample size of 110 patients (55 patients in each arm) is needed to achieve 80% power at a 0.05 significance level (hazard ratio of 5.6) (nQuery, Boston, USA). A pre-planned blinded sample size re-estimation will be conducted by members of the Biostatistics Consulting Unit at the RI-MUHC when approximately 50% of patients have been evaluated for the primary endpoint. The decision to increase the sample size will be made by the DSMB independently from any investigators. The study team has no intention of decreasing the sample size.
For the secondary endpoint of rate of severe adverse event, which is estimated to be 1% for ERCP alone, a sample size of 110 patients would give us 80% power with a one-sided significance of 0.05 to detect non-inferiority at a margin of 4.8%.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ERCP alone
ERCP procedure alone and management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed
ERCP alone
ERCP with biliary stenting will be performed alone. ERCP is part of standard of care for biliary drainage. An endoscope is advanced to the small intestines and a metal stent is inserted through the tumor instead of bypassing the tumor to effectively drain the biliary system under x-ray guidance.
Management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed
ERCP + ProEUS-GE
ERCP with prophylactic eus-guided gastroenterostomy
ERCP +ProEUS-GE
ERCP is performed as described above. following the ERCP, the scoped is switched for an echoendoscope which is advanced to the stomach. A stent is then placed between the stomach and the small intestines, creating a connection (ProEUS-GE).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ERCP alone
ERCP with biliary stenting will be performed alone. ERCP is part of standard of care for biliary drainage. An endoscope is advanced to the small intestines and a metal stent is inserted through the tumor instead of bypassing the tumor to effectively drain the biliary system under x-ray guidance.
Management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed
ERCP +ProEUS-GE
ERCP is performed as described above. following the ERCP, the scoped is switched for an echoendoscope which is advanced to the stomach. A stent is then placed between the stomach and the small intestines, creating a connection (ProEUS-GE).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Elevated liver function tests requiring ERCP without evidence of MGOO of significant gastroparesis (see exclusion criterion #3 and #4)
3. ECOG 0 or 1
4. ASA\<4
5. Provision of informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Gastroparesis with a Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) of \>2. Gastroparesis is defined as having symptoms of MGOO without radiological and/or endoscopic evidence of mechanical obstruction.
3. Uncorrectable coagulopathy and/or thrombocytopenia
4. Age \< 18 or ≥ 85
5. Evidence of peritoneal carcinomatosisAscites
6. Liver metastasis \> 30% of the liver volume
7. Portal hypertension with gastroesophageal varices and/or ascites
8. Surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Jewish General Hospital
OTHER
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Yen-I Chen
assistant professor of medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, , Canada
McGill University Health Center
Montreal, , Canada
St-Michael's Hospital (SMH)
Toronto, , Canada
Hôpital Privé des Peupliers
Paris, , France
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Hyderabad, , India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Corey Miller, MD
Role: primary
Yen-I Chen, MD
Role: primary
Natalia C. Calo, MD
Role: primary
Gianfranco Donatelli, MD
Role: primary
Sundeep Lakhtakia, MD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MP-37-2024-9711
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.