Prophylactic EUS-guided Gastroenterostomy in Advanced Periampullary Cancers

NCT ID: NCT05994521

Last Updated: 2024-10-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-04-09

Study Completion Date

2027-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of Prophylactic EUS-gastroenterostomy (ProEUS-GE) as a preventative approach for malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) in men and women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with periampullary cancer.

The main question this study aims to answer is can ProEUS-GE effectively prevent the occurrence of MGOO in patients with periampullary cancer?

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group 1 (ERCP alone) or Group 2 (ERCP + ProEUS-GE). The study will compare the outcomes between these groups to determine the effectiveness of ProEUS-GE in preventing MGOO.

Researchers will compare Group 1 (ERCP alone) with Group 2 (ERCP + ProEUS-GE) to see if the addition of ProEUS-GE leads to a reduced occurrence of MGOO in patients with periampullary cancer.

The primary endpoint is the rate of malignant gastric outlet obstruction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research Question:

The principal research question is whether ProEUS-GE can prevent the occurrence of MGOO in patients with pancreatic head cancer. We hypothesize that the addition of ProEUS-GE during ERCP reduces the rate of development of subsequent MGOO in advanced periampullary solid cancer without significantly increasing the rate of adverse events when compared to ERCP alone.

The Proposed Trial Trial Design: This is a patient- and outcome assessor-blinded multicentre randomized controlled superiority trial. The endoscopist performing the procedure will not be blinded to treatment allocation.

Planned Trial Interventions: 1) ERCP with biliary decompression + prophylactic EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (ProEUS-GE) and 2) ERCP with biliary decompression alone. All procedures will be performed by experienced endoscopists with or without trainee involvement. Following informed consent, sedation will be via conscious sedation or general anesthesia, as per existing institutional procedural protocols. A medical effectiveness approach will be adopted where only the initial randomly allocated treatment is dictated by the trial.

Participant Allocation: After confirmation of fulfillment of all study inclusion/exclusion criteria and pre-procedural consent, patients will be randomly allocated, intra-procedurally during the ERCP, to one of the two approaches.

The primary endpoint is the rate of gastric outlet obstruction.

Sample size calculation is based on the primary endpoint of MGOO considering competing risk of death. Based on the most current available literature and institutional data, we estimated a cumulative incidence rate of MGOO of 5% and 25% at 18 months in the ERCP + ProEUS-GE and ERCP alone arms, respectively. Using a two-sided log-rank test that accounts for a 35% rate of competing risk (death 30% and surgery 5%) in each group while considering a loss to follow-up of 10%, with a minimal follow-up time of 1 year, we calculated that a sample size of 110 patients (55 patients in each arm) is needed to achieve 80% power at a 0.05 significance level (hazard ratio of 5.6) (nQuery, Boston, USA). A pre-planned blinded sample size re-estimation will be conducted by members of the Biostatistics Consulting Unit at the RI-MUHC when approximately 50% of patients have been evaluated for the primary endpoint. The decision to increase the sample size will be made by the DSMB independently from any investigators. The study team has no intention of decreasing the sample size.

For the secondary endpoint of rate of severe adverse event, which is estimated to be 1% for ERCP alone, a sample size of 110 patients would give us 80% power with a one-sided significance of 0.05 to detect non-inferiority at a margin of 4.8%.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Gi

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be randomly allocated, intra-procedurally during the ERCP, to one of the two approaches.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
As with most procedural interventional trials, blinding of the endoscopist is not feasible. To limit detection biases, outcome assessors and patients are blinded to the treatment allocation. Outcome assessors are independent individuals not involved with patient consent or randomization and not present at the index procedure.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ERCP alone

ERCP procedure alone and management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ERCP alone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ERCP with biliary stenting will be performed alone. ERCP is part of standard of care for biliary drainage. An endoscope is advanced to the small intestines and a metal stent is inserted through the tumor instead of bypassing the tumor to effectively drain the biliary system under x-ray guidance.

Management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed

ERCP + ProEUS-GE

ERCP with prophylactic eus-guided gastroenterostomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ERCP +ProEUS-GE

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ERCP is performed as described above. following the ERCP, the scoped is switched for an echoendoscope which is advanced to the stomach. A stent is then placed between the stomach and the small intestines, creating a connection (ProEUS-GE).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ERCP alone

ERCP with biliary stenting will be performed alone. ERCP is part of standard of care for biliary drainage. An endoscope is advanced to the small intestines and a metal stent is inserted through the tumor instead of bypassing the tumor to effectively drain the biliary system under x-ray guidance.

Management of MGOO will be on a wait-and-see approach, using endoscopic interventions performed only if obstruction is clinically diagnosed

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ERCP +ProEUS-GE

ERCP is performed as described above. following the ERCP, the scoped is switched for an echoendoscope which is advanced to the stomach. A stent is then placed between the stomach and the small intestines, creating a connection (ProEUS-GE).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Radiological diagnosis of a periampullary cancer that is precluded from upfront surgical resection of curative intent due to advanced tumor stage. These include locally advanced or metastatic cancers of the pancreatic head, distal bile duct, duodenum, or ampulla. cancers.
2. Elevated liver function tests requiring ERCP without evidence of MGOO of significant gastroparesis (see exclusion criterion #3 and #4)
3. ECOG 0 or 1
4. ASA\<4
5. Provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient with clinical and radiological evidence of malignant gastric outlet obstruction defined as Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS) of \< 3 with radiological and/or endoscopic evidence of a mechanical obstruction from a gastric or duodenal stricture. GOOSS is a validated tool for assessing MGOO and is scored based on the diet tolerated by the patient: 0 for no oral intake, 1 for liquids only, 2 for soft diet, and 3 for low residue or full diet.
2. Gastroparesis with a Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) of \>2. Gastroparesis is defined as having symptoms of MGOO without radiological and/or endoscopic evidence of mechanical obstruction.
3. Uncorrectable coagulopathy and/or thrombocytopenia
4. Age \< 18 or ≥ 85
5. Evidence of peritoneal carcinomatosisAscites
6. Liver metastasis \> 30% of the liver volume
7. Portal hypertension with gastroesophageal varices and/or ascites
8. Surgically altered upper gastrointestinal anatomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jewish General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Unity Health Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yen-I Chen

assistant professor of medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

McGill University Health Center

Montreal, , Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

St-Michael's Hospital (SMH)

Toronto, , Canada

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Hôpital Privé des Peupliers

Paris, , France

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology

Hyderabad, , India

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada France India

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yen-I Chen, MD

Role: CONTACT

(514) 934-1934 ext. 65651

Myriam Martel, MSc

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Corey Miller, MD

Role: primary

Yen-I Chen, MD

Role: primary

Natalia C. Calo, MD

Role: primary

Gianfranco Donatelli, MD

Role: primary

Sundeep Lakhtakia, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MP-37-2024-9711

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.