Endoscopic Gastroenterostomy Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy

NCT ID: NCT06567691

Last Updated: 2025-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-01

Study Completion Date

2027-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Recent comparative data suggest that EUS gastroenterostomy offers more durable patency than enteral stents for treatment of malignant GOO, leading some endoscopists to suggest that EUS gastroenterostomy should be the preferred endoscopic treatment approach.

EUS gastroenterostomy and surgical gastrojejunostomy have been compared in retrospective cohort analysis, suggesting a high technical success rate a shorter hospital length of stay for the endoscopic approach \[4\]. Comparison of these techniques has not been reported in controlled prospective fashion. A prospective trial is necessary in order to define the optimal interventional management option for treatment of malignant GOO in the context of the contemporary and rapidly evolved range of available endoscopic and surgical treatment options.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Due to the nature and means of access of the two interventions (one via peroral approach and one via abdominal incision) blinding of the subjects, study investigators, and treating clinicians will not be practicable short of subjecting patients to sham endoscopy and/or surgery, which we feel would be unethical.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EUS Gastrojejunostomy

Patient will undergo an Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Gastrojejunostomy procedure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

EUS Gastrojejunostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Gastrojejunostomy. Under live real-time EUS visualization, a solution of normal saline or water and dilute methylene blue will be infused through the nasobiliary drainage catheter to mechanically distend the small intestine and create a suitable, expanded fluid-filled target for transgastric access. Once a suitable target has been identified, a lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) will then be deployed securely across the newly created gastroenterostomy tract. Appropriate stent placement will be confirmed.

Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS)

Intervention Type OTHER

A previously validated instrument for assessing tolerance of oral intake.

Surgical Gastrojejunostomy

Patient will undergo Surgical Gastrojejunostomy procedure.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgical Gastrojejunostomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Gastrojejunostomy will be performed via an open technique using an upper midline or left sub-costal incision (at the discretion of the surgeon). An antecolic, pro-peristaltic, gastrojejunostomy will be performed using one of two standard techniques: 1) hand-sewn: 2-layer anastomosis using absorbable suture or 2) stapled: single-layer anastomosis using a surgical stapler with closed staple height ranging from 1.0 - 1.5 mm and suture closure of the common enterotomy. Feeding tube placement will be at the discretion of the operating surgeon and if performed, will be performed via a Stamm technique. Abdominal fascial closure will be performed with absorbable, monofilament, suture and skin will be closed using staples or suture at the discretion of the surgeon.

Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS)

Intervention Type OTHER

A previously validated instrument for assessing tolerance of oral intake.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

EUS Gastrojejunostomy

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) Gastrojejunostomy. Under live real-time EUS visualization, a solution of normal saline or water and dilute methylene blue will be infused through the nasobiliary drainage catheter to mechanically distend the small intestine and create a suitable, expanded fluid-filled target for transgastric access. Once a suitable target has been identified, a lumen apposing metal stent (LAMS) will then be deployed securely across the newly created gastroenterostomy tract. Appropriate stent placement will be confirmed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical Gastrojejunostomy

Gastrojejunostomy will be performed via an open technique using an upper midline or left sub-costal incision (at the discretion of the surgeon). An antecolic, pro-peristaltic, gastrojejunostomy will be performed using one of two standard techniques: 1) hand-sewn: 2-layer anastomosis using absorbable suture or 2) stapled: single-layer anastomosis using a surgical stapler with closed staple height ranging from 1.0 - 1.5 mm and suture closure of the common enterotomy. Feeding tube placement will be at the discretion of the operating surgeon and if performed, will be performed via a Stamm technique. Abdominal fascial closure will be performed with absorbable, monofilament, suture and skin will be closed using staples or suture at the discretion of the surgeon.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Gastric Outlet Obstruction Scoring System (GOOSS)

A previously validated instrument for assessing tolerance of oral intake.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years or older
* Able to provide informed consent
* Biopsy-proven cancer
* Cancer without surgical resection as a curative treatment option
* Clinical and radiographic presentation consistent with primary or metastatic tumor causing foregut obstruction at the level of the pylorus and/or duodenum

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \<18 years
* Pregnancy
* Unable to provide informed consent
* White Blood Count \< 3,000
* Absolute Neutrophil Count \< 1,500
* International normalized ratio \> 1.6
* Platelet count \< 100,000
* Cancer with surgical resection as a curative treatment option
* Surgically altered foregut anatomy
* Multifocal intestinal obstruction
* Abdominal ascites prohibitive of surgical candidacy
* Abdominal wall mesh prohibitive of surgical candidacy
* Child's Class B or C cirrhosis
* Gastroesophageal varices or known portal hypertension
* Body mass index \>40
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Patrick Yachimski

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Patrick Yachimski, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

240747

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.