EUS-guided Versus Laparoscopic Gastrojejunostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT ID: NCT05605327
Last Updated: 2022-11-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-11-01
2024-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This envisaged investigator driven study will be performed using an AXIOS stent produced by the company BOSTON SCIENTIFIC. This stent is registered in Europe and CE approved for the drainage of pancreatic fluid collections, the gall bladder and bile ducts. As described above we and other groups have used this product off-label to succesfully perform EUS-guided GJ. High-quality randomized controlled data are however required that will be generated in the proposed EATING RCT study. It is expected that the data, generated by the EATING RCT trial will contribute significantly to resolve the current question regarding the best management of patients with GOO. Ultimately the objective should be to provide high quality affordable care that is minimally invasive to cancer patients with GOO. Such high quality data will also be crucial when applying for registration and CE approval of this product for use in the management of GOO .
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Enteral Anastomosis for the Treatment of Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Endoscopic Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy
NCT05561907
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT04810377
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Versus Surgical Gastroenterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
NCT05564143
Outcome of Patients With Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction Undergoing Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Gastroenterostomy or Enteral Metal Stenting
NCT07230665
Endoscopic Gastroenterostomy Versus Surgical Gastrojejunostomy
NCT06567691
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Currently, EUS-GJ is performed in the participating centres with the off-label use of the Hot-AXIOS stent outside study context continuously. Moreover, whilst awaiting randomized confirmation, the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy has suggested EUS-GJ as an alternative to L-GJ and enteral stenting in centers with expertise.
Study hypothesis: In patients with malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction we hypothesize that endoscopic ultrasound guided placement of a lumen apposing stent, to create a gastrojejunostomy, will result in reduced procedure related morbidity, shorter time-to-tolerate oral intake, shorter hospital stay and a higher quality of life compared to surgery, while reducing procedure related and overall costs. Primary endpoint is the overall rate of procedure-related adverse events happening within 90 days of the endoscopic or surgical procedure. Key secondary endpoints are time to oral intake and post-procedural hospital stay.
The EATING study will utilize a combined design. In the EATING-C prospective, multicentre, real-life, cohort study all patients with mGOO will be enrolled irrespective of their performance status, their disease stage and treatment (i.e. EUS-GJ, OR surgical \[laparoscopic or not\] GJ OR enteral stenting).
The subgroup of patients with expected survival over 2 months and without radiographic signs of significantly obstructive peritoneal disease will be included in the EATING-RCT, an international, open-label, parallel group, superiority randomized controlled trial in which patients who fulfill the inclusion/exclusion criteria (see 4.2 inclusion criteria) and give written informed consent will be randomized to either EUS-GJ or L-GJ. The same outcomes will be prospectively evaluated in the EATING-C and EATING-RCT up to 12 months or death of the patient, whichever comes first.
During the assessment of eligibility, patients will receive explanation of the treatment possibilities for mGOO. If they fall within criteria for EATING-RCT they will be asked informed consent for a randomization to L-GJ versus EUS-GJ. If they meet EATING-C, but not EATING-RCT criteria or if they are willing to receive one specific procedure only, these patients will not be randomized and thus be included in the EATING-C.
Expected full trial duration: 12 months after inclusion of last patient (target n=120).
Individual trial duration for patient: 12 months after treatment or time until death (whichever comes first).
In previous published experiences, surgical Gastro-Jejunostomy has been associated with a 20 to 40% rate of adverse events (10.1055/s-0043-101695, 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887). Previous experiences of EUS-guided Gastro-Jejunostomy have found a 10 to 15% rate of adverse events (10.1097/MCG.0000000000000887, 10.1016/j.dld.2020.04.021). We performed an international, multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched analysis of consecutive EUS-GJ and L-GJ procedures in 3 European centres In this study we observed a 2.7% vs. 27.0% rate of overall adverse events in EUS-GJ vs. L-GJ respectively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using the Hot-Axios and the WEST approach.
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy
EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using the Hot-Axios and the WEST approach.
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
Laparoscopic gastroenterostomy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Voluntary written informed consent of the participant or their legally authorized representative has been obtained prior to any screening procedures
2. ≥ 18 years old
3. Endoscopic or radiological confirmation of a gastric outlet obstruction due to an obstructive malignant neoplastic lesion extending from the distal one third of the stomach or the duodenum
4. GOOSS score(8) \< 2 (no oral intake or liquids only)
5. Performance status justifying palliative treatment for mGOO
6. No contra-indications to undergo deep conscious sedation or general anesthesia All participants that are considered for Trial participation, per the above criteria will be documented on the Screening Log, including Screen Failures.
Participants eligible for inclusion in the EATING-RCT must meet all of the following criteria:
2. Endoscopic and surgical creation of a gastrojejunostomy are deemed both technically feasible by the treating physician.
3. Expected survival exceeds 2 months.
4. ECOG Performance Status ≤2
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with benign GOO
2. Patients who are candidates for curative surgical resection of the primary disease
3. Patients whose mGOO is likely to resolve very quickly (within days or weeks) under anti-tumoral treatment (such as lymphoproliferative diseases).
Participants eligible for the EATING-RCT Trial must not meet any of the following criteria:
1. ECOG Performance status \> 2
2. Expected survival of less than 2 months according to disease extent and comorbidities, as assessed by an oncologist or a treating physician. If unclear, the Coordinating Investigator is to be contacted, after which in- or exclusion will be decided upon by means of consensus.
3. Peritoneal carcinomatosis with signs of obstruction on cross-sectional imaging (on either small or large bowel level).
In case these parameters leads to ambiguity in individual patients at participating sites, the Coordinating Investigator will be contacted and a final conjoint decision for in/exclusion will be made after revision of radiological findings.
4. Grade II and III ascites OR ascites interfering with the EUS-GJ trajectory, complicating successful creation of an EUS-GJ.
5. Previous surgical procedures or reconstructions impeding EUS-GJ.
6. Diffuse tumor involvement of the gastric wall impeding EUS-GJ
7. Participation in other interventional procedures which may be of influence on primary or secondary outcome parameters
8. Presence of other strictures in gastrointestinal tract leading to radiological or clinical signs of obstruction or patency issues.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasme University Hospital
OTHER
Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel
OTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
Université Catholique de Louvain
OTHER
San Raffaele University Hospital, Italy
OTHER
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante
OTHER
Hospital del Rio Hortega
OTHER
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
OTHER
Universita di Verona
OTHER
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
s65286
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.