Novel Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy Vs Single Balloon Enteroscopy In Patients With Small Bowel Disorders- A RCT
NCT ID: NCT05548140
Last Updated: 2023-03-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-20
2022-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Primary objective: Rate of total enteroscopy (TER) by means of NMSE or SBE with: Complete antegrade approach or combined antegrade and retrograde approach
2. Secondary objective:
1. Technical success of anterograde and retrograde approach
2. Procedural time (minutes)
3. Depth of maximum insertion (cm)
4. Diagnostic yield
5. Therapeutic success
6. Adverse events
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Small Bowel Evaluation Using Novel Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy
NCT04959994
Utility of Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy for Suspected Small Bowel Pathology
NCT04152239
Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy: Experience From a Single Large Tertiary Care Centre
NCT05228379
Mini-sized MCE for Detection of Small Bowel in Children Under the Age of 10 Years
NCT05522101
PowerSpiral Enteroscopy Performance and Safety
NCT04884113
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
2. RATIONALE: SBE is the standard procedure used for small bowel examination at our center. SBE in prior studies has shown diagnostic yield of 40-60%5 but very low TER (0-22%)4,10, with long procedure time. NMSE on the other hand has the advantage of greater TER and high diagnostic yield with shorter procedure times and minimal adverse events. Our study on NMSE11 has shown high diagnostic yield of 70%, with TER of 61% and total procedure time of around 40min. Various studies have shown the safety and efficacy of SBE and NMSE. One recent prospective study by Beyna9 et al. using NMSE for only antegrade enteroscopy showed total enteroscopy rate (TER) of 10.6% (14/132) with technical success of 97%. Majority of patients (74.2%) underwent NMSE for suspected GI bleeding. Overall diagnostic yield was 74.2% and endotherapy was done in 68.2% patients. In our study11 on NMSE, recently published, we have shown comparable technical success using both antegrade (92.85%) and retrograde (100%) routes. There was higher total enteroscopy rate of 60.6% with antegrade route showing 31.1%.This real-world scenario analysis showed that diagnostic yield of NMSE was 70% in those who successfully underwent enteroscopy and therapeutic procedures were done in almost one fourth of patients. Till date, there are no comparative data between NMSE and Balloon assisted enteroscopy techniques. Hence, we aim to compare NMSE and SBE in Randomized controlled trial.
3. STUDY METHODS / STUDY PROCEDURE / METHODS OF ASSESSMENT: Patients presenting with symptoms and signs suggestive of small bowel disorders will be admitted and investigated as per the latest guidelines2. Patients satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized in one of the two arms and will undergo either NMSE or SBE. As per the presentation and indication patients in both arms will undergo antegrade or retrograde enteroscopy. Patients undergoing antegrade enteroscopy will also undergo retrograde enteroscopy if indicated in the same sitting with the aim of total enteroscopy. Patients will be managed according to the findings and will be discharged as per the conditions. Patients will be followed up in the OPD or telephonically 1 week and after 1 month of discharge.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NOVEL MOTORIZED SPIRAL ENTEROSCOPY
This arm involves performance of spiral enteroscopy using a specialized enteroscope under general anaesthesia in patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria.
Novel Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy
This study involves performance of spiral enteroscopy in one arm and single balloon enteroscopy in the other arm in patients who satisfy inclusion criteria
SINGLE BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY
This arm involves performance of single balloon enteroscopy using a specialized single balloon enteroscope in patients who fulfill inclusion criteria.
Novel Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy
This study involves performance of spiral enteroscopy in one arm and single balloon enteroscopy in the other arm in patients who satisfy inclusion criteria
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Novel Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy
This study involves performance of spiral enteroscopy in one arm and single balloon enteroscopy in the other arm in patients who satisfy inclusion criteria
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age \> 18 years
3. Patients willing to give written consent
Exclusion Criteria
2. Age \< 18 years.
3. Contraindications for endoscopy due to comorbidities
4. Unable to provide written informed consent
5. Patients with known severe GI tract inflammation, intestinal obstruction, gastroesophageal varices that preclude a safe enteroscopy procedure
6. Coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia that couldn't be corrected by blood product transfusion
7. Pregnant patients
8. Health status American Society of Anaesthetist Classification (ASA) \>3
9. Inability to tolerate sedation or general anaesthesia for any reason
10. Pediatrics patients (infants and toddlers)
11. Eosinophilic esophagitis
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohan Ramchandani
Consultant Gastroenterologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dr Hardik Rughwani, MBBS, MD, DM
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
AIG Hospitals
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hardik Rughwani
Hyderabad, Other, India
AIG Hospitals
Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ramchandani M, Rughwani H, Inavolu P, Singh AP, Tevethia HV, Jagtap N, Sekaran A, Kanakagiri H, Darishetty S, Reddy DN. Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of novel motorized spiral enteroscopy in small-bowel disorders: a single-center, real-world experience from a tertiary care hospital (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Mar;93(3):616-626. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
Rondonotti E, Spada C, Adler S, May A, Despott EJ, Koulaouzidis A, Panter S, Domagk D, Fernandez-Urien I, Rahmi G, Riccioni ME, van Hooft JE, Hassan C, Pennazio M. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy. 2018 Apr;50(4):423-446. doi: 10.1055/a-0576-0566. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
Buscaglia JM, Dunbar KB, Okolo PI 3rd, Judah J, Akerman PA, Cantero D, Draganov PV. The spiral enteroscopy training initiative: results of a prospective study evaluating the Discovery SB overtube device during small bowel enteroscopy (with video). Endoscopy. 2009 Mar;41(3):194-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1119602. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
Yamamoto H, Ogata H, Matsumoto T, Ohmiya N, Ohtsuka K, Watanabe K, Yano T, Matsui T, Higuchi K, Nakamura T, Fujimoto K. Clinical Practice Guideline for Enteroscopy. Dig Endosc. 2017 Jul;29(5):519-546. doi: 10.1111/den.12883. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Clinical Practice Guideline for Enteroscopy
Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of novel motorized spiral enteroscopy in small-bowel disorders: a single-center, real-world experience from a tertiary care hospital
Small-bowel capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel disorders: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review
The spiral enteroscopy training initiative: results of a prospective study evaluating the Discovery SB overtube device during small bowel enteroscopy
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MOTOR-AIG-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.