Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Retinal Detachment Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05538156

Last Updated: 2022-09-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-30

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite advances in surgical techniques over the recent decades, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main obstacle to successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, accounting for nearly 75% of all primary surgical failures. It is characterized by the growth and contraction of cellular membranes within the vitreous cavity and on both surfaces of the detached retina as well as intraretinal fibrosis.

The Retina Society classification, modified in 1991 and currently the most widely used, divided PVR into three grades. Grade A is limited to the presence of vitreous haze and pigment clumps. Grade B includes rolled or irregular edges of tear and/or inner retinal surface wrinkling with possible retinal stiffness and vessel tortuosity. Grade C is defined as the presence of full-thickness fixed retinal folds and is further subdivided based on the number of hours involved and the location.

Recently, Foveau et al., in a retrospective comparative case series, have demonstrated that performing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during RRD surgery may increase the anatomical success rate for this indication.

The aim of this multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ILM peeling on surgical outcomes in patients with primary macula-off RRD complicated by grade B PVR.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Despite advances in surgical techniques over the recent decades, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) remains the main obstacle to successful rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair, accounting for nearly 75% of all primary surgical failures. It is characterized by the growth and contraction of cellular membranes within the vitreous cavity and on both surfaces of the detached retina as well as intraretinal fibrosis.

The Retina Society classification, modified in 1991 and currently the most widely used, divided PVR into three grades. Grade A is limited to the presence of vitreous haze and pigment clumps. Grade B includes rolled or irregular edges of tear and/or inner retinal surface wrinkling with possible retinal stiffness and vessel tortuosity. Grade C is defined as the presence of full-thickness fixed retinal folds and is further subdivided based on the number of hours involved and the location.

Grade B PVR is thought to represent an immature form of PVR with a definite potential for progression to further stages of PVR. Specific treatment for moderate PVR seems to be essential to halt the disease process and to reduce the risk of postoperative re-detachment. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the management of grade PVR. In macula-off RRD, vitrectomy with gas tamponade is often used as a primary option, with a retinal reattachment rate of 60%.

Recently, Foveau et al., in a retrospective comparative case series, have demonstrated that performing internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during RRD surgery may increase the anatomical success rate for this indication.

The aim of this multi-center, prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ILM peeling on surgical outcomes in patients with primary macula-off RRD complicated by grade B PVR.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Retinal Detachment Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

The internal limiting membrane is not removed

Group Type OTHER

Control group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Vitrectomy and gas tamponade without internal limiting membrane peeling

Intervention group

The internal limiting membrane of the posterior pole is removed

Group Type OTHER

Intervention group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Control group

Vitrectomy and gas tamponade without internal limiting membrane peeling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intervention group

Vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane peeling and gas tamponade

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients older than 18 years old
* With macula-off retinal detachment complicated by grade B proliferative vitreoretinopathy

Exclusion Criteria

* Underage patients
* History of retinal detachment
* History of intraocular surgery (except for cataract surgery)
* Traumatic retinal detachment
* Macular hole-associated retinal detachment
* Concurrent macular disease (diabetic maculopathy, age-related macular degeneration)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Central Hospital, Nancy, France

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jean-Baptiste CONART, Prof

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brabois Hospital, Nancy, France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jean-Baptiste CONART, Prof

Role: CONTACT

+33383155101

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Borowicz D, Nowomiejska K, Nowakowska D, Brzozowska A, Toro MD, Avitabile T, Junemann AG, Rejdak R. Functional and morphological results of treatment of macula-on and macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with pars plana vitrectomy and sulfur hexafluoride gas tamponade. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 May 24;19(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1120-3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31126280 (View on PubMed)

Charteris DG. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: pathobiology, surgical management, and adjunctive treatment. Br J Ophthalmol. 1995 Oct;79(10):953-60. doi: 10.1136/bjo.79.10.953. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 7488586 (View on PubMed)

Eissa MGAM, Abdelhakim MASE, Macky TA, Khafagy MM, Mortada HA. Functional and structural outcomes of ILM peeling in uncomplicated macula-off RRD using microperimetry & en-face OCT. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;256(2):249-257. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3875-7. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29299741 (View on PubMed)

Fallico M, Russo A, Longo A, Pulvirenti A, Avitabile T, Bonfiglio V, Castellino N, Cennamo G, Reibaldi M. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling during primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Jul 19;13(7):e0201010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201010. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30024983 (View on PubMed)

Foveau P, Leroy B, Berrod JP, Conart JB. Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling in Macula-off Retinal Detachment Complicated by Grade B Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;191:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.037. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29621507 (View on PubMed)

Steel DH, Joussen AM, Wong D. ILM peeling in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment; does it improve the outcome? Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;256(2):247-248. doi: 10.1007/s00417-017-3876-6. Epub 2017 Dec 27. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29282562 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-A00665-38

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of ILM Peeling in RRD/ I-Peel
NCT04767555 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
1ry Versus 2ry ILM Peeling in RD
NCT07346560 RECRUITING NA
REtinal Detachment Outcomes Study
NCT05863312 RECRUITING NA