Retinal Displacement Rates in Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Pars Plana Vitrectomy For Primary Retinal Detachment
NCT ID: NCT04158622
Last Updated: 2021-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-03-15
2022-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retinal Displacement After Pneumatic Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment (ALIGN)
NCT04089033
Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment in Patients With Extended Criteria
NCT02871531
Pneumatic Retinopexy Versus Vitrectomy for Retinal Detachment
NCT01639209
Pneumatic Retinopexy for Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: To Steamroll or Not
NCT04723420
Intravitreal Topotecan in the Repair of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment with Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy
NCT05523869
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) is a minor surgical intervention employed to repair retinal detachments, carried out in the clinic's procedure room. Standard criteria for this procedure include one or more retinal breaks within one clock hour located at the superior eight clock hours, without signs of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. The procedure involves injection of a small gas bubble into the eyeball via a fine needle. Two gases can be injected into the eye: perfluoropropane (C3F8), which lasts 6 weeks, and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), which lasts about 2 weeks. After injection of the gas bubble, the patient is required to maintain a strict 'head posture' (for example, head tilt to left) for up to 10 days. The gas bubble spontaneously dissipates after 2-6 weeks, depending on the gas selected. Additionally, laser treatment or cryotherapy is carried out either before or 1-2 days after injection of the gas bubble, to secure the retinal tear. The advantages of PnR over PPV are: (1) Low risk of cataract - secondary cataract formation is uncommon after PnR, but more common after PPV; (2) Quicker visual rehabilitation - due to the smaller size gas bubble and less invasive nature of the procedure, patients undergoing PnR commonly have improved vision within days after treatment; (3) Immediate availability of intervention - unlike PPV, PnR is carried out in a treatment room, and there are no delays due to operating room availability.
Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) is a surgical procedure carried out in the operating room under regional anesthetic, and often times sedation. During PPV, the vitreous gel is removed from the eye to allow space for a larger gas bubble than is possible in PnR, and also to relieve any vitreous traction which may otherwise impair reattachment of the retina. The retina is reattached by either draining the subretinal fluid through a peripheral retinal break; by draining the subretinal fluid through a posterior retinotomy; or by using a heavier-than-water liquid such as perfluocarbon (PFC) to push out the subretinal fluid. Laser or cryotherapy is applied around the retinal tear to create chorioretinal adhesions (as in PnR). At the end of the surgery, the vitreous cavity is filled with a substance that will tamponade the retina to the wall of the eye while the adhesions form. Tamponade agents can be temporary, such as SF6 and C3F8 (same gases as mentioned for PnR), which are absorbed by 2-6 weeks, or long term, such as silicone oil, which requires a second surgery to remove. After the surgery, the patient may be required to maintain a 'head posture' (for example, head tilt to left) for up to one week to support the area of the retinal tear optimally by 'floating' the gas bubble up against it. As the gas bubble is larger in PPV, the head posturing requirements are less strict. The advantages of PPV over PnR are: (1) higher primary single procedure success rate (although same final reattachment success rate); (2) less follow-up visits in the first week.
Patients may experience metamorphopsia, or image distortion, after having their RRD repaired especially those with a detached macula. In 2010, Shiragami et al were the first to demonstrate hyperfluorescent lines, adjacent to the retinal blood vessels in Fundus autofluorescence imaging (FAF) of the retina after RD repair surgery.They theorized that these lines which are called Retinal Vessel Printings (RVP) correspond to the location of the retinal blood vessels before the retinal detachment. In FAF, an image is taken with structures that naturally fluoresce such as the lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) appearing brighter. According to this theory, prior to the retinal detachment, certain RPE cells were covered by the retinal blood vessels. Afterwards, with the displacement of the retina due to the retinal detachment these RPE cells become exposed to light which increases in metabolic activity producing more lipofuscin and therefore, appearing more hyperautofluorescent on the FAF. Moreover, these reference lines allow us to quantify the displacement of the retina after retinal detachment surgeries. In this study by Shiragami, 62.8% of eyes demonstrated hyperautofluorescent lines superior to the retinal blood vessels suggesting downward displacement. Since Shiragami's first report, several other studies looked into retinal displacement after RD repair.
There is no study in the scientific literature comparing the rate of retinal displacement and its association with visual function, including metamorphopsia, in patients undergoing different procedures for RRD repair.
The aim of this study is to compare retinal displacement following primary macula-off retinal detachment repair treated with pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV). The primary study hypothesis is that pneumatic retinopexy will cause less retinal displacement at 3 months for patients with macula-off primary retinal detachment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pneumatic Retinopexy
Patients with retinal detachment allocated to pneumatic retinopexy + laser/cryotherapy
PnR + laser/cryotherapy
Pneumatic retinopexy plus laser/cryotherapy
Pars Plana Vitrectomy
Patients with retinal detachment allocated to pars plana vitrectomy + laser/cryotherapy
PPV + laser/cryotherapy
Pars plana vitrectomy plus laser/cryotherapy
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PnR + laser/cryotherapy
Pneumatic retinopexy plus laser/cryotherapy
PPV + laser/cryotherapy
Pars plana vitrectomy plus laser/cryotherapy
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Single retinal break OR group of breaks no larger than four clock hours apart between each other (Figure 2)
* All breaks in detached retina must be between 3-9 o'clock (Figure 2, blue lines)
* No significant proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) (can have grade A or B)
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to read English language
* Age \< 18 years
* Mental incapacity
* Previous vitrectomy (index eye)
* Previous retinal detachment (index eye)
* Previous or concurrent retina pathology (e.g. vascular)
* Previous or concurrent macula pathology (macular hole, ERM, AMD, DME)
* Anterior segment surgery within 3 months
* Inability to maintain post intervention head positioning
* Inability to carry out detailed examination of the peripheral retina due to media opacity NOTE: Lens/posterior hyaloid status does not impact eligibility.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Unity Health Toronto
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rajeev Muni, FRSCS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Unity Health Toronto
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Michael's Hospital Eye Clinic
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Rajeev Muni, MD Msc FRCSC
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-239
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.