Evaluation of a New Surgical Technique for Macular Hole Which Was Not Closed After a Previous Surgery
NCT ID: NCT02946372
Last Updated: 2025-11-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-11-30
2017-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The vast majority of cases are idiopathic. Without treatment, the macular hole evolves through a series of stages until the extension of the diameter (up to 500 microns and higher values). With a fully developed macular hole, patients complain of metamorphopsia and decreased visual acuity.
This pathology has clearly benefited from advances in microsurgery and better understanding of its pathophysiology. Macular hole treatment has evolved to include small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and placement of intraocular gas tamponade.
The postoperative closure rate is close to 80%, but strongly depends on the initial characteristics of the hole, its diameter remaining the main prognostic factor. Thus for macular holes \<400 microns, the closure rate is close to 92% dropping to 56% for macular holes above 400 microns. In case of surgical failure, one or more reoperations can be proposed, but with a lower closure rate.
The quest for a surgical technique presenting a greater success rate is a common goal to all retinologists.
Here the investigators propose a new surgical technique, derived from the FLAP method, and consisting of an inner limiting membrane transposition.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a new surgical technique for the treatment of macular holes already operated but without macular hole closure, allowing these patients a new therapeutic alternative. The success of this technique will be confirmed by detecting postoperatively the presence of the transposed internal limiting membrane into the foveal region.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in Highly Myopic Eyes
NCT02896972
Inverted ILM Repositioning as Treatment for Full Thickness Macular Holes
NCT01228188
Macular Hole Surgery With Temporal Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap (MARTIAL)
NCT03287102
Full Thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study
NCT00286507
PEELED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE REPOSITION
NCT06359548
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ILMT
internal limiting membrane autologous transplantation (ILMT)
internal limiting membrane transplantation (ILMT)
internal limiting membrane autologous transplantation (ILMT)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
internal limiting membrane transplantation (ILMT)
internal limiting membrane autologous transplantation (ILMT)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patient who already received at least a macular hole surgery,
3. Period of at least 4 months since last macular hole surgery,
4. Patient who underwent peeling of the internal limiting membrane,
5. Presents in OCT an open criteria macular hole,
6. The presence of a cataract in the preoperative clinical examination is not against indication. Its removal can be integrated to the surgery,
7. Patient who signed the consent form
Exclusion Criteria
2. Macular Hole "flat open" or closed,
3. No progressive macular pathology other than the presence of a macular hole (retinal detachment, Macular degeneration related to age) Idiopathic and secondary macular holes are eligible if they have already been operated with the prior internal limiting membrane coat.
4. Patient unaffiliated or not the beneficiary of a social security system, or equivalent health insurance,
5. Pregnant or breastfeeding women,
6. Absence of patient consent,
7. Patient in exclusion period involved in another study,
8. Patient on administrative or judicial supervision
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Groupe Hospitalier de la Region de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Patrick LENOBLE, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Groupe Hospitalier de la Region de Mulhouse et Sud Alsace
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
GHRMSA
Mulhouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016-A01431-50
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
GHRMSA 872
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.