Large Macular Hole Closure Rate With Amniotic Membrane Graft With and Without Limitorrhexis

NCT ID: NCT05083650

Last Updated: 2021-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-10

Study Completion Date

2023-03-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with idiopathic macular holes (MHs) postoperative closure rates for large MHs (diameter \> 550 μm) are disappointing and often require a second intervention, different techniques have been described with very variable success rates in different published studies, an efficient technique with good functional outcome has not been found.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Interventional study in large macular holes (diameter \> 550 μm) using an amniotic membrane with and without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Macular Holes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Large MHs (diameter \> 550 μm)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
We never let the patient know the performed surgery

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Amniotic membrane without internal limiting membrane peeling

The surgery performed will be phacoemulsification + vitrectomy using an amniotic membrane to plug the macular hole using air as tamponade.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Macular hole closure with amniotic membrane with/without internal limiting membrane peeling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pars plana vitrectomy with/without internal limiting membrane peeling, amniotic membrane, and air tamponade

Amniotic membrane with internal limiting membrane peeling

The surgery performed will be phacoemulsification + vitrectomy + internal limiting membrane peeling using an amniotic membrane to plug the macular hole using air as tamponade.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Macular hole closure with amniotic membrane with/without internal limiting membrane peeling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Pars plana vitrectomy with/without internal limiting membrane peeling, amniotic membrane, and air tamponade

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Macular hole closure with amniotic membrane with/without internal limiting membrane peeling

Pars plana vitrectomy with/without internal limiting membrane peeling, amniotic membrane, and air tamponade

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Not myopic patients (\<6 Dioptre or \<26 mm)
* Large macular hole \>550 μm
* \> 6 months symptoms
* Signing informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with other ocular disease (diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, uveitis, ocular tumors, etc)
* Using systemic drugs that are toxic for the optic nerve or retina (chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, tamoxifen, ethambutol, etc)
* Patients with ocular surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto de Oftalmología Fundación Conde de Valenciana

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jose Luis Rodriguez Loaiza

Medical Subdirector

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Daniel Rios Esquer, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana

Ishtar A Astorga Carballo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana

Jose L Rodriguez Loaiza, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana

Zita Chao Loyo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana

Felipe Esparza Correa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto de Oftalmologia Conde de Valenciana

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zita Chao Loyo, MD

Role: CONTACT

+52 33994182

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jose Luis Rodriguez Loaiza, MD

Role: primary

+52 5554123012

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MAM CONDE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id