Full Thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study

NCT ID: NCT00286507

Last Updated: 2012-06-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

141 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-07-31

Study Completion Date

2011-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A macular hole is a fairly common problem in the retina and is an important cause of loss of central vision. The aim of this study is to determine whether, in patients with a stage 2 or 3 full thickness macular hole (FTMH), peeling a very fine, transparent tissue that covers the surface of the retina, called the internal limiting membrane (ILM) during surgery is superior to non-ILM peeling macular hole surgery. The main outcomes are improvement in vision, achievement of macular hole closure, need for re-operation, health related quality of life (HRQOL) and cost effectiveness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) is an important cause of loss of central vision, usually leading to severe visual impairment. Up to 20% of affected people will develop a FTMH in both eyes. There is uncertainty in the literature and among vitreo-retinal surgeons about the balance of potential benefits and adverse effects of ILM peeling in FTMH surgery for stage 2-3 holes.

FILMS is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) in patients with stage 2-3 FTMH less less than 18 months duration investigating whether ILM peeling improves the anatomical and visual outcome of macular hole surgery and the quality of life of patients with this retinal disease. Cost-effectiveness is also being addressed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stage 2 or 3 Full Thickness Macular Hole

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ILM peeling

Combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and pars plana vitrectomy with postoperative intraocular tamponade with gas, with ILM peeling

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitrectomy, post hyaloid detachment and gas injection with or without ILM peel.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and pars plana vitrectomy with postoperative intraocular tamponade with gas, with or without ILM peeling

No ILM peeling

combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and pars plana vitrectomy with postoperative intraocular tamponade with gas without ILM peeling

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vitrectomy, post hyaloid detachment and gas injection with or without ILM peel.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and pars plana vitrectomy with postoperative intraocular tamponade with gas, with or without ILM peeling

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Vitrectomy, post hyaloid detachment and gas injection with or without ILM peel.

Combined cataract surgery (phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation) and pars plana vitrectomy with postoperative intraocular tamponade with gas, with or without ILM peeling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Idiopathic FTMH of stage 2-3, Duration of hole ≤18 months, Visual acuity equal to or worse than 20/40 in the study eye.

Exclusion Criteria

Stage 1 or 4 FTMH, Stage 2-3 FTMH of \> 18 months duration, Visual acuity \>20/40 in study eye, FTMH related to high myopia (\>6 dioptres), FTMH related to trauma, any other causes of decreased vision (ie corneal scarring, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma if central and/or paracentral absolute visual field defects present), patient unable to understand English, patient unable to give informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NHS Grampian

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Aberdeen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Noemi Lois

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

NHS Grampian

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Victoria Eye and Ear Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Waterford Regional Hospital

Waterford, , Ireland

Site Status

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Aberdeen, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bristol Eye Hospital

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Ninewells Hospital

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Gartnavel General Hospital

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Royal Liverpool Hospital

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Oxford Eye Hospital

Oxford, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sunderland Eye Infirmary

Sunderland, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lois N, Burr J, Norrie J, Vale L, Cook J, McDonald A, Boachie C, Ternent L, McPherson G; Full-thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study (FILMS) Group. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus no peeling for idiopathic full-thickness macular hole: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 1;52(3):1586-92. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6287.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21051731 (View on PubMed)

Lois N, Burr J, Norrie J, Vale L, Cook J, McDonald A; Full-Thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study (FILMS) Group. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of internal limiting membrane peeling for patients with idiopathic full thickness macular hole. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial: FILMS (Full-thickness Macular Hole and Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling Study). Trials. 2008 Nov 3;9:61. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-61.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 18980675 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CZH/4/235

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Foveal Sparing of the ILM
NCT03488576 COMPLETED NA