Comparison of Adhesive and Non-adhesive Endotracheal Tube Holder Applied
NCT ID: NCT05521009
Last Updated: 2024-10-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-02-07
2024-08-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endotracheal Tube Securement Study
NCT03760510
Assessment of Ventilation Parameters for Extubation Prediction in ICU
NCT06531005
Closed-loop Versus Conventional Ventilation Mode During Mobilization Period in Critical Care Patients
NCT03176329
The Effect of Two Different Bed Baths Applied to Patients on Mechanical Ventilation Support
NCT05762081
"Efficacy of Intermittent Enteral Nutrition Versus Continuous Administration in Intensive Care"
NCT05879263
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There are studies in the literature showing that endotracheal tube fixation methods may increase the risk of infection in relation to the material from which they are produced. In the literature review, it is stated that as a result of the contamination of the adhesive tape with oral secretions in the detection of ET, it prepares an environment for the proliferation of pathogenic microorganisms and increases the risk of infection. ET adhesive tapes cover the mouth in a way that makes oral hygiene difficult due to its wide width. From time to time, the sticky part is left open, which creates an environment prone to infection as a result of the adhesion of unwanted substances such as infection and hair. The evidence is that pathogens are present on existing adhesive tape, and many researchers have found that the adhesive tape is contaminated outside of its original packaging. On the other hand, cotton tapes when tied horizontally (traditionally) cause increased secretions to be absorbed and may therefore harbor infection.
There are currently 3 tube fixation materials in of researches hospital. The first of these is fixation with a sticking tape, the second is fixation with gauze, and the third is commercial cotton tube ties. The sticking tape is not preferred for long-term tube fixation, since its stickiness is lost by getting wet due to the secretion in the mouth of the patients in the intensive care unit. Fixation with gauze is more time consuming in terms of use and requires the use of a cutting tool such as a scalpel to cut the lace, and it is not preferred because it may cause damage and injuries to the tube. Commercial fastening ties, which are easier to use but have adhesive tape at the contact point with the tube, are used in the institution. The pathogen harboring risk that applies to adhesive tapes may also apply to these fixing materials. In addition, as the cares get dirty, the tube fixation material is changed by the nurses and oral care is provided. Each time the fixings are opened, some adhesive tape remains on the tube and a rough surface forms on the tube over time. It is known that pathogen hosting rates are high on rough floors. Choosing the appropriate fixation material in terms of patient safety and performing their care correctly are among the important responsibilities of the intensive care nurse. This study was planned to compare the pathogen harboring rates of endotracheal tube fixation tie and gauze fixation, which are tube fixation materials.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
endotracheal tube fixation
Tube fixation will be performed using a bandage in one of the groups. The patients identified with the bandage will form the control group of the study. The group of the patients to be included in the groups will be determined by drawing lots. Except for the different fixation material, no different application will be made to the patients in oral care. As soon as the patients are intubated, a swab will be taken twice, from the outer surface of the endotracheal tube from the fixation distance, and from the same area 3 days after intubation
Control grup, sticky tube holder
In patients using adhesive tube holders and non-adhesive tube holders, it will be investigated whether there is bacterial growth on the tube.
Enfection
Tube fixation will be performed with adhesive tube fixation material to one of the groups. In which group the patients to be included in the groups will be will be determined by drawing lots. Except for the different fixation material, no different application will be made to the patients in oral care. As soon as the patients are intubated, a swab will be taken twice, from the outer surface of the endotracheal tube from the fixation distance, and from the same area 3 days after intubation.
Control grup, sticky tube holder
In patients using adhesive tube holders and non-adhesive tube holders, it will be investigated whether there is bacterial growth on the tube.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Control grup, sticky tube holder
In patients using adhesive tube holders and non-adhesive tube holders, it will be investigated whether there is bacterial growth on the tube.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cumhuriyet University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zuhal Gülsoy
Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
zuhal gulsoy
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Nurse
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cumhuriyet University
Sivas, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Harris PN, Ashhurst-Smith C, Berenger SJ, Shoobert A, Ferguson JK. Adhesive tape in the health care setting: another high-risk fomite? Med J Aust. 2012 Jan 16;196(1):34. doi: 10.5694/mja11.11211. No abstract available.
Landsperger JS, Byram JM, Lloyd BD, Rice TW; Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2019 May 7;23(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2440-7.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CU
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.