Effectiveness of Ventilation Modes in Intensive Care: A Comparison of Mandatory Minute Ventilation and Synchronized Intermittant Mandatory Ventilation Using Bioelectrical Impedance Tomography
NCT ID: NCT06961227
Last Updated: 2025-05-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
25 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-10
2025-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Mandatory Minute Ventilation (MMV) is a hybrid mode combining features of SIMV and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV), guaranteeing a preset minute ventilation (tidal volume × respiratory rate). It synchronizes support based on the patient's spontaneous efforts and compensates in cases of insufficient minute ventilation.
Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, radiation-free imaging technique that enables real-time monitoring of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion by applying alternating electrical currents through surface electrodes. EIT has demonstrated strong correlation with findings from computed tomography, nitrogen washout, PET, and SPECT imaging modalities.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MMV compared to SIMV in mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable adult patients (\>18 years old) in the intensive care unit. Patients must not require vasopressors, have a FiO₂ ≤ 60%, PEEP ≤ 8 cmH₂O, or receive neuromuscular blocking agents.
Patients will be monitored under both SIMV and MMV modes, separated by a 12-hour interval. To minimize carry-over effects, a one-hour washout period will be implemented before data collection with EIT. Key parameters including PO₂/FiO₂ ratio, PaCO₂, and EtCO₂ will be assessed. The sequence of ventilatory mode application will follow a crossover study design.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Synchronized Intermittent Mechanical Ventilation Versus Open Lung Ventilation With Spontaneous Respiration
NCT00891085
Ventilatory Parameters and Inflammatory Responses of Neonates Ventilated by Different Modes of Ventilation
NCT01514331
Comparison Between IMV and SIMV/PS for Ventilatory Support of Children: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT00549809
Machine Learning Ventilator Decision System VS. Standard Controlled Ventilation
NCT05132751
Comparison of Dynamic Mechanical Power Formula With Geometric Method in Pressure- and Volume-Controlled Ventilation: A Validation Study
NCT07099729
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) is a non-invasive, radiation-free imaging modality that provides real-time monitoring of regional lung ventilation and perfusion through surface electrodes. EIT has been validated against conventional imaging and monitoring methods including computed tomography, nitrogen washout, PET, and SPECT. It enables continuous bedside evaluation of ventilation distribution, making it particularly useful for guiding mechanical ventilation strategies in critically ill patients.
This prospective, single-center, crossover study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and physiological impact of MMV compared to SIMV in adult ICU patients who are hemodynamically stable but require mechanical ventilation due to various non-neuromuscular reasons. Inclusion criteria require patients to be over 18 years old, not on vasopressor therapy, with FiO₂ ≤ 60%, and without the need for high PEEP (\>8 cmH₂O) or neuromuscular blockade.
Each patient will be ventilated with both SIMV and MMV modes for 12 hours each, with the order of modes randomized using a crossover design. To eliminate carry-over effects, a one-hour washout period will be implemented between mode transitions. During each ventilation mode, EIT will be used to assess real-time regional ventilation distribution. Additionally, gas exchange parameters including PO₂/FiO₂ ratio, PaCO₂, and EtCO₂ will be recorded. The primary objective is to determine whether MMV offers comparable or superior ventilation distribution and gas exchange compared to SIMV in this specific patient population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CROSSOVER
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ICU Patients
Hemodynamically stable adult patients (≥18 years) in the intensive care unit who are receiving mechanical ventilation and are eligible to undergo both SIMV and MMV ventilation modes in a crossover observational design. Patients will be monitored using Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) under each mode.
No investigational intervention
No investigational intervention. Patients will be observed under standard ventilation modes (SIMV and MMV) as part of routine care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No investigational intervention
No investigational intervention. Patients will be observed under standard ventilation modes (SIMV and MMV) as part of routine care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Intubated and receiving invasive mechanical ventilation
Hemodynamically stable (no vasopressor support)
FiO₂ ≤ 60%
PEEP ≤ 8 cmH₂O
Not receiving neuromuscular blocking agents
Able to tolerate switching between SIMV and MMV modes
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with neuromuscular diseases affecting respiratory drive
Unstable hemodynamics or ongoing need for vasopressors
Patients requiring high PEEP (\>8 cmH₂O)
Patients with DNR (do not resuscitate) status
Participation in another interventional study
\-
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Harran University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Melahat Yalcin Solak
Lecturer Doctor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Harran University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Sanliurfa, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Franchineau G, Jonkman AH, Piquilloud L, Yoshida T, Costa E, Roze H, Camporota L, Piraino T, Spinelli E, Combes A, Alcala GC, Amato M, Mauri T, Frerichs I, Brochard LJ, Schmidt M. Electrical Impedance Tomography to Monitor Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Mar 15;209(6):670-682. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1118CI.
Lobo B, Hermosa C, Abella A, Gordo F. Electrical impedance tomography. Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jan;6(2):26. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.12.06.
Guthrie SO, Lynn C, Lafleur BJ, Donn SM, Walsh WF. A crossover analysis of mandatory minute ventilation compared to synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation in neonates. J Perinatol. 2005 Oct;25(10):643-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211371.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HRÜ.24.20.35
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.