Closed-loop Versus Conventional Ventilation Mode During Mobilization Period in Critical Care Patients

NCT ID: NCT03176329

Last Updated: 2018-08-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

267 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-09-19

Study Completion Date

2018-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nursing is essential in critically ill patients care but with high risk of hypoxia, especially during mobilization. Full closed-loop control ventilation is well established for her safety in unselected ventilated critical care patients with different lung conditions compared to conventional ventilation.

The aim of this study is to assess the ability of a full closed-loop control ventilation (Intellivent-ASV, TM) to reduce hypoxia during mobilization period in unselected ventilated patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective randomized cross over study including all consecutive ventilated patient with predicted duration of ventilation \> 48 hours, inspired oxygen fraction \< 60% and without neuromuscular blocking agent.

Patient were randomized to be ventilated with full closed-loop control or conventional ventilation 30 minutes before the first nursing period after inclusion. The ventilator was switched in the other mode (conventional or full closed-loop respectively), 30 minutes before the following nursing period. Between this two consecutive nursing periods, ventilation mode is choosed by the attending physician.

The primary outcome was the oxygenation measured by pulse oxymetry during the nursing periods.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Ill Patients Ventilated Patients

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Prospective randomized crossover study
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

INTELLIVENT-ASV / Conventional mode

Full closed-loop ventilation control (INTELLIVENT-ASV) is set 30 minutes before Nursing 1 after randomization. Ventilator is switch to conventional ventilation 30 minutes before Nursing 2

Group Type OTHER

Nursing 1 : INTELLIVENT-ASV

Intervention Type OTHER

Nursing 2 : Conventional mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional mode / INTELLIVENT-ASV

Conventional ventilation control is set 30 minutes before Nursing 1 after randomization. Ventilator is switch to full closed-loop ventilation (INTELLIVENT-ASV) 30 minutes before Nursing 2.

Group Type OTHER

Nursing 2 : INTELLIVENT-ASV

Intervention Type OTHER

Nursing 1 : Conventional mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nursing 1 : INTELLIVENT-ASV

Intervention Type OTHER

Nursing 2 : INTELLIVENT-ASV

Intervention Type OTHER

Nursing 1 : Conventional mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Nursing 2 : Conventional mode

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Invasive mechanical ventilation for expected time \>48h

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Neuromuscular blocking agent (discontinuous or continuous) infusion
* Inspired oxygen fraction (FiO2) setting \> or = 60%
* Mobilization contraindication (hemodynamic instability, unstable vertebral trauma, etc.)
* Neurological breathing (patients with brain injury)
* Pulse oxymetry monitoring unavailable
* Expected ventilation weaning \<24h after randomization.
* Moribund patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hopital of Melun

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Chelly Jonathan

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jonathan Chelly, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mixed, ICU, Centre Hospitalier de Melun

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de Melun

Melun, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bialais E, Wittebole X, Vignaux L, Roeseler J, Wysocki M, Meyer J, Reychler G, Novotni D, Sottiaux T, Laterre PF, Hantson P. Closed-loop ventilation mode (IntelliVent(R)-ASV) in intensive care unit: a randomized trial. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Jun;82(6):657-68. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26957117 (View on PubMed)

Arnal JM, Garnero A, Novonti D, Demory D, Ducros L, Berric A, Donati S, Corno G, Jaber S, Durand-Gasselin J. Feasibility study on full closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV) in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational comparative study. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 11;17(5):R196. doi: 10.1186/cc12890.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24025234 (View on PubMed)

Clavieras N, Wysocki M, Coisel Y, Galia F, Conseil M, Chanques G, Jung B, Arnal JM, Matecki S, Molinari N, Jaber S. Prospective randomized crossover study of a new closed-loop control system versus pressure support during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2013 Sep;119(3):631-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182952608.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23619172 (View on PubMed)

Arnal JM, Wysocki M, Novotni D, Demory D, Lopez R, Donati S, Granier I, Corno G, Durand-Gasselin J. Safety and efficacy of a fully closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV(R)) in sedated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective randomized crossover study. Intensive Care Med. 2012 May;38(5):781-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2548-6. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22460854 (View on PubMed)

Chelly J, Mazerand S, Jochmans S, Weyer CM, Pourcine F, Ellrodt O, Thieulot-Rolin N, Serbource-Goguel J, Sy O, Vong LVP, Monchi M. Automated vs. conventional ventilation in the ICU: a randomized controlled crossover trial comparing blood oxygen saturation during daily nursing procedures (I-NURSING). Crit Care. 2020 Jul 22;24(1):453. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03155-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32698860 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MelunH-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Recruitment Maneuver After Intubation
NCT01014299 COMPLETED PHASE4