Evaluation of Implant-prosthetic Rehabilitation Performed With Two Implants With Different Surface Characteristics

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-22

Study Completion Date

2023-09-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In this case-control study a bioactive implant surface was compared with traditional surfaced implants. Primary objectives: Test the implant stability in post-extractive sites, comparing traditional surfaced implants (MultiNeO CS, control group) to bioactive surfaced implants (NINA- MultiNeO NH, treatment group).

Primary outcome endpoints were Implant stability, assessed through Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values and Marginal bone loss (MBL)

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

The Rehabilitation of Atrophic Jaws Using Short Implants With Different Surface Characteristics

NCT05766878

Peri-Implantation Loss Periodontal Bone Loss Periimplantitis +3 more

COMPLETED NA

Abutment Macro Design and Peri-implant Tissues

NCT02546713

Edentulous

COMPLETED NA

Soft Tissue Responses Around Nanostructured Calcium-phosphate-coated Implant Abutments on Dental Implants: Histological, Genetic and Clinical Evaluation in Smokers and Non-smokers.

NCT01620918

Missing Several Teeth Minimum of 2 Dental Implants Needed

COMPLETED NA

Manual or Digitally Guided Surgical Technique for Replacing Single Tooth Edentulism by Means of Sub-crestally Placed Implants. A 3-year Parallel Randomized Clinical Study on Marginal Bone Levels Stability

NCT06250621

Dental Implant Marginal Bone Loss Peri Implant Health +1 more

COMPLETED NA

Rehabilitation of Single Aesthetic Areas Using Narrow Diameter Implants

NCT06528587

Implant Complication

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In this post- market case control study, the tested CE-marked dental implants are MultiNeO CS 1930 and NINA MultiNeO NH 9330, both manufactured by Alpha-Bio Tec. .

Alpha-Bio Tec. implants systems are made of Ti-6AI-4V ELI Titanium alloy which is a high-performance and highly biocompatible alloy for manufacturing bone implants. Alpha-Bio Tec developed the superior NanoTec\&trade implant surface for optimized osseointegration process. Alpha-Bio Tec NanoTec™ implant surface is achieved by a complex process of large particle sandblasting and acid etching. Sandblasting with large particles allows the creation of macropores (20-40 microns), while the double etching allows the creation of micropores (1-5 microns). The micro - structure and roughness properties of NanoTec™ Implant Surface greatly influences the dynamic wettability of implant surfaces during the initial contact with the host.

The overwritten implant surface enables greater absorption of blood and plasma proteins directly inside the micropores, immediately after the implant has been placed.

It is the implant surface of MultiNeO. NeO or MultiNeO is defined as a system since it includes three types of connections: a conical narrow connection (CHC), a conical standard conical connection (CS) and an Internal Hex connection (IH). the fixture has a straight coronal part, a slightly tapered body and a conical apical part. We will use MultiNeO CS in control group. One of the MultiNeO biggest clinical advantages since it is as good at bone type 4 as it is at bone type 1, 2 or 3.

Topography and surface roughness of MultiNeO lead to some clinical advantages:

Increased early BIC; Increased primary and secondary stability; Shortened healing period; Accelerated and improved osseointegration process.

MultiNeO CS has an implant surface similar to the aforementioned SLA surface manufactured by Straumann. In fact, SLA is a sub-micron scale roughness created by Aluminum oxide blasting and double acid etching.

NINA- MultiNeO NH is used for treatment group, and it is being tested. NINA MultiNeO NH has got an innovative bioactive surface.

NINA MultiNeO NH surface is a combination of the abovementioned roughening process and the creation of titanium oxide nano structure. Its hydrophilic part is created by resorbable salt thus maintaining its hydrophilicity.

Although a variety of implant surface are available for implant rehabilitation, the first hypothesis is that NINA MultiNeO NH Alpha-Bio Tec ® will be positively adopted for rehabilitation of missing teeth with shorter healing time and less marginal bone loss.

The idea behind these studies is to maximize the effect of the bioactive surface testing its behavior in a poor host environment with a reduced time

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Missing Teeth Edentulous Jaw Edentulous Mouth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

NINA- MultiNeO NH

implant with bioactive surface

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

implant placement in edentulous area

MultiNeO CS

implant with traditional surface

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

implant placement in edentulous area

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

implant placement

implant placement in edentulous area

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient with type 1-2 post extraction sites
2. Subject is 30-80 years old
3. Patient ASA 1 or 2
4. Patients with healthy periodontal conditions (Treated periodontitis, PI\<25%, BoP\<25%)
5. Patients that are willing to sign an informed consent and participate in a clinical study

Exclusion Criteria

1. Absence Type 1-2 post extraction sites
2. Patient ASA 3 or 4
3. Untreated Periodontitis
4. Any sites where an implant already failed sites
5. Allergy declared to one or more medicaments to be used during treatment
6. Pregnancy (confirmed by verbal inquiry)

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes