Study of Brain, Reward, and Kids' Eating

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-10

Study Completion Date

2024-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Children from rural communities are at greater risk for obesity than children from more urban communities. However, some children are resilient to obesity despite greater exposure to obesogenic influences in rural communities (e.g., fewer community-level physical activity or healthy eating resources). Identifying factors that promote this resiliency could inform obesity prevention. Eating habits are learned through reinforcement (e.g., hedonic, familial environment), the process through which environmental food cues become valued and influence behavior. Therefore, understanding individual differences in reinforcement learning is essential to uncovering the causes of obesity. Preclinical models have identified two reinforcement learning phenotypes that may have translational importance for understanding excess consumption in humans: 1) goal-tracking-environmental cues have predictive value; and 2) sign-tracking-environmental cues have predictive and hedonic value (i.e., incentive salience). Sign-tracking is associated with poorer attentional control, greater impulsivity, and lower prefrontal cortex (PFC) engagement in response to reward cues. This parallels neurocognitive deficits observed in pediatric obesity (i.e., worse impulsivity, lower PFC food cue reactivity). The proposed research aims to determine if reinforcement learning phenotype (i.e., sign- and goal-tracking) is 1) associated with adiposity due to its influence on neural food cue reactivity, 2) associated with reward-driven overconsumption and meal intake due to its influence on eating behaviors; and 3) associated with changes in adiposity over 1 year. The investigators hypothesize that goal-tracking will promote resiliency to obesity due to: 1) reduced attribution of incentive salience and greater PFC engagement to food cues; and 2) reduced reward-driven overconsumption. Finally, the investigators hypothesize reinforcement learning phenotype will be associated due to its influence on eating behaviors associated with overconsumption (e.g., larger bites, faster bite rat and eating sped). To test this hypothesis, the investigators will enroll 76, 8-10-year-old children, half with healthy weight and half with obesity based on Centers for Disease Control definitions. Methods will include computer tasks to assess reinforcement learning, dual x-ray absorptiometry to assess adiposity, and neural food cue reactivity from functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Resilience to the Effects of Advertising in Children

NCT05073185

Obesity, Childhood

RECRUITING

Food Genetics Behavior Study

NCT05783765

Obesity, Childhood

RECRUITING NA

Interoception and Eating Behaviors in Children

NCT06504654

Obesity, Childhood Eating Behavior

RECRUITING

Family, Responsibility, Education, Support, and Health for Food Responsiveness

NCT06207110

Obesity, Childhood

RECRUITING NA

Genetic Risk, Parental Feeding Practices, and Appetitive Traits in Early Life

NCT06534541

Childhood Obesity

RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Obesity, Childhood Eating Behavior

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Health

Children will rate foods on health

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Food Rating

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Children will rate foods on taste, health, and desire to eat. The order in which they rate the food characteristics is randomly assigned and counter-balanced across participants

Taste

Children will rate foods on taste

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Food Rating

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Children will rate foods on taste, health, and desire to eat. The order in which they rate the food characteristics is randomly assigned and counter-balanced across participants

Wanting

Children will rate foods on desire to eat

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Food Rating

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Children will rate foods on taste, health, and desire to eat. The order in which they rate the food characteristics is randomly assigned and counter-balanced across participants

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Food Rating

Children will rate foods on taste, health, and desire to eat. The order in which they rate the food characteristics is randomly assigned and counter-balanced across participants

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* In order to be enrolled, children must be of good health based on parental self-report.
* Have no neurodevelopmental disorder (e.g., attention deficit hyperactivity disorder - ADHD) or learning disabilities (e.g., dyslexia).
* Have no allergies to the foods or ingredients used in the study.
* Not be taking any medications known to influence body weight, taste, food intake, behavior, or blood flow.
* Be 8-10 years-old at enrollment.
* speaks English.

* The parent who has the most knowledge of the child's eating behavior, sleep and behavior must be available to attend the visits with their child. This would be decided among the parents.

Exclusion Criteria

* They are not within the age requirements (\< than 8 years old or \> than 10 years-old at baseline).
* If they are taking cold or allergy medication, or other medications known to influence cognitive function, taste, appetite, or blood flow.
* don't speak English.
* are colorblind.
* has a learning disability, ADHD, language delays, autism or other neurological or psychological conditions.
* has a pre-existing medical condition such as type I or type II diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, Cushing's syndrome, Down's syndrome, severe lactose intolerance, Prader-Willi syndrome, HIV, cancer, renal failure, or cerebral palsy.
* is allergic to foods or ingredients used in the study.

* the parent is unable to attend the study visits

Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes