Assessment of Relationship Between Preoperative Nutritional Status and Perioperative/Postoperative Conditions in Patients With Lung Cancer Scheduled for Lobectomy
NCT ID: NCT05417672
Last Updated: 2022-06-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
63 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-29
2022-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Nutritional Risk Parameters on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications in Geriatric Thoracic Surgery Cases
NCT05890820
Association Between Different Parameters of Nutritional Assessment and Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Patients
NCT02901132
Association Between Perioperative Nutritional Status and Surgical Outcome in Digestive System Cancer Patients
NCT03763526
The Effect of Nutrition-optimized Prehabilitation on Perioperative Intervention in Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT06549829
Impact of Preoperative Sarcopenia on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Operated on From Digestive Cancers
NCT02811666
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In the operating room, routine monitoring (electrocardiography, invasive blood pressure measurement, arterial blood gas monitoring, peripheral oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide measurement by capnography) will be applied to the patients in accordance with the standard protocol for elective lobectomy surgery.
Hemodynamic changes (eg. dysrhythmia, hypotension, hypertension, hemorrhage), metabolic status (pH, bicarbonate, base excess), lactate, glucose level in blood gas evaluation and intraoperative complications will be recorded during the intraoperative period.
In the postoperative period, length of stay in the intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, early complications (eg. dysrhythmia, acute coronary syndrome, sepsis, mediastinitis, pneumonia, surgical site infection, prolonged air leak), time to start oral intake and transition to adequate oral intake will be recorded in the one-month postoperative period.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lung cancer scheduled lobectomy
Nutritional Risk Screening-2002
Nutritional Risk Screening-2002
Nutritional Risk Index
Nutritional Risk Index
Mini Nutritional Assessment
Mini Nutritional Assessment
Glasgow Prognostic Score
Glasgow Prognostic Score
Prognostic Nutritional Index
Prognostic Nutritional Index
Anthropometric measurements
middle arm circumference
Handgrip strength test
Handgrip strength test
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nutritional Risk Screening-2002
Nutritional Risk Screening-2002
Nutritional Risk Index
Nutritional Risk Index
Mini Nutritional Assessment
Mini Nutritional Assessment
Glasgow Prognostic Score
Glasgow Prognostic Score
Prognostic Nutritional Index
Prognostic Nutritional Index
Anthropometric measurements
middle arm circumference
Handgrip strength test
Handgrip strength test
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Lung lobectomy operation will be performed
* 18 years and older patients
* Having an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 1, 2, 3
* Having approved and signed the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients younger than 18 years
* Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 4 and above
* Patients who did not accept informed consent
* Patients who refused to participate in the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Bursa, Nilüfer, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, Ballmer P, Biolo G, Bischoff SC, Compher C, Correia I, Higashiguchi T, Holst M, Jensen GL, Malone A, Muscaritoli M, Nyulasi I, Pirlich M, Rothenberg E, Schindler K, Schneider SM, de van der Schueren MA, Sieber C, Valentini L, Yu JC, Van Gossum A, Singer P. ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017 Feb;36(1):49-64. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
McKenna NP, Bews KA, Al-Refaie WB, Colibaseanu DT, Pemberton JH, Cima RR, Habermann EB. Assessing Malnutrition Before Major Oncologic Surgery: One Size Does Not Fit All. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):451-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.034. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, Johnston N, Whittaker S, Mendelson RA, Jeejeebhoy KN. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1987 Jan-Feb;11(1):8-13. doi: 10.1177/014860718701100108.
Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z; Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003 Jun;22(3):321-36. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5.
Vellas B, Guigoz Y, Garry PJ, Nourhashemi F, Bennahum D, Lauque S, Albarede JL. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. Nutrition. 1999 Feb;15(2):116-22. doi: 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00171-3.
Neelemaat F, Kruizenga HM, de Vet HC, Seidell JC, Butterman M, van Bokhorst-de van der Schueren MA. Screening malnutrition in hospital outpatients. Can the SNAQ malnutrition screening tool also be applied to this population? Clin Nutr. 2008 Jun;27(3):439-46. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2008.02.002. Epub 2008 Apr 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LungCancerMalnutrition
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.