G8, CARG, Frailty, and Nutritional Markers in Predicting Chemotoxicity

NCT ID: NCT07151794

Last Updated: 2025-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-02

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate the ability of G8, CARG, and Frailty scales to predict chemotherapy-related toxicity and the need for G-CSF in elderly cancer patients. It also investigates their correlation with nutritional biomarkers (albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, CRP) and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) test.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Aging is associated with decreased physiological reserves, making elderly cancer patients more vulnerable to chemotherapy toxicity (CT). Traditional performance scales like ECOG may be insufficient for treatment decisions. Tools such as G8, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), and the Cancer and Aging Research Group (CARG) score are practical screening instruments recommended by ASCO and SIOG, yet their combined predictive accuracy for CT and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) usage remains underexplored.

Objectives: This prospective study aims to evaluate the predictive performance of the G8, CARG, and Frailty scales-alone and in combination with nutritional biomarkers (albumin, prealbumin, hemoglobin, CRP)-in forecasting chemotherapy-related toxicity and G-CSF need. It also investigates the correlation between these geriatric assessment tools and Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores.

Methods: The study will be conducted at Çanakkale University Medical Faculty Oncology Outpatient Clinic. Patients aged 65 and above with a planned chemotherapy regimen will be recruited. Before the first chemotherapy cycle, patients will undergo G8, CARG, Frailty, and MNA assessments. Nutritional biomarkers will be extracted from pre-treatment routine lab tests. Chemotherapy toxicity and G-CSF requirement will be monitored across treatment cycles. ROC, correlation, and regression analyses will be conducted to evaluate predictive validity.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Geriatric Oncology Oncology Nutrition Nutrition Assessment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

The study group consists of cancer patients aged 65 and older who are scheduled to receive at least two cycles of chemotherapy. Patients with hematological malignancies or receiving concurrent targeted, hormonal, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy are excluded.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 65 years
* Diagnosed with solid tumor malignancy
* Planned to undergo at least two cycles of adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or metastatic chemotherapy
* Clinically stable condition
* Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of hematological malignancies
* Concurrent hormonal therapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy
* Acute infection or advanced organ failure (cardiac, hepatic, renal)
* Cognitive or psychiatric impairment preventing test participation
* Prior treatment with G-CSF
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cemre Aydeğer

Research asistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Univercity

Çanakkale, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bellera CA, Rainfray M, Mathoulin-Pelissier S, Mertens C, Delva F, Fonck M, Soubeyran PL. Screening older cancer patients: first evaluation of the G-8 geriatric screening tool. Ann Oncol. 2012 Aug;23(8):2166-2172. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr587. Epub 2012 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22250183 (View on PubMed)

Church S, Rogers E, Rockwood K, Theou O. A scoping review of the Clinical Frailty Scale. BMC Geriatr. 2020 Oct 7;20(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01801-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33028215 (View on PubMed)

Kenis, C., Bron, D., Libert, Y., et al., Relevance of a geriatric assessment in older patients with cancer: a systematic review, Journal of Geriatric Oncology, 2014, 5(2): 3-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Decoster L, Van Puyvelde K, Mohile S, Wedding U, Basso U, Colloca G, Rostoft S, Overcash J, Wildiers H, Steer C, Kimmick G, Kanesvaran R, Luciani A, Terret C, Hurria A, Kenis C, Audisio R, Extermann M. Screening tools for multidimensional health problems warranting a geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: an update on SIOG recommendationsdagger. Ann Oncol. 2015 Feb;26(2):288-300. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu210. Epub 2014 Jun 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24936581 (View on PubMed)

Wildiers, H., Heeren, P., Puts, M., et al., Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in older patients with cancer: facts and future, The Lancet Oncology, 2014, 15(5): e184-e192.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hurria A, Togawa K, Mohile SG, Owusu C, Klepin HD, Gross CP, Lichtman SM, Gajra A, Bhatia S, Katheria V, Klapper S, Hansen K, Ramani R, Lachs M, Wong FL, Tew WP. Predicting chemotherapy toxicity in older adults with cancer: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Sep 1;29(25):3457-65. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.34.7625. Epub 2011 Aug 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21810685 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COMU-FNO-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Management of Malnutrition in Oncogeriatrics
NCT06425315 NOT_YET_RECRUITING