Association Between Perioperative Nutritional Status and Surgical Outcome in Digestive System Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT03763526

Last Updated: 2021-09-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

196 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-20

Study Completion Date

2021-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Malnutrition is a common problem in cancer patients. It negatively influences patients' prognosis and quality of life. In gastrointestinal patients, it is also caused by insufficient food intake due to dysphagia, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, impaired digestion and absorption.

Furthermore, influence of prior oncologic treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy), have been associated with prolonged hospital stay, more postoperative complications and low survival outcome1-4. So, the proper assessment of nutrition status to detect perioperative malnutrition may allow appropriate nutritional therapy and improve survival5.

However, the important factor which prolongs survival rate is good preoperative nutrition status because it effects the postoperative nutrition outcome. The objective of this study is to correlate the association between pre- and postoperative nutrition status and surgical outcomes.

The Nutrition Alert Form (NAF) is a clinical tool for determining nutritional status. The NAF was modified from Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)6, and it is easy to use and does not require nutritional expertise based on laboratory and physical examination. Therefore, the NAF has been used extensively for screening of malnutrition in hospitalized Thai patients and it can classify the nutritional status into three groups : NAF-A (Normal-Mild malnutrition), NAF-B (Moderate malnutrition), NAF-C (Severe malnutrition)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Questions

\- What is the relationship between the preoperative nutrition status and the postoperative nutrition status in gastrointestinal cancer patients ?

Secondary Questions

\- What is the relationship between malnutrition during preoperative and postoperative stages, compared with postoperative complications?

OBJECTIVE :

The objective of this study is to study the association between pre- and postoperative nutrition status compared with postoperative complications and surgical outcome. The results of this study may affect future nutrition practices and encourage different behaviors in gastrointestinal cancer patients who prepare to undergo surgery.

Sample size is calculated by n=(z\_(1-α/2)\^2 p(1-p))/d\^2

Proportion (p) = 0.80, Error (d) = 0.064 Alpha (α) = 0.05, Z(0.975) = 1.959964 Power = 0.80 Sample size (n) = 178 Include drop out 10 % = 196 patients

Patients:

For 196 gastrointestinal cancer patients (esophageal, gastric, colon and rectum cancer), who underwent scheduled surgery. Every patient underwent nutritional assessment by NAF before surgery and (1 \& 3 months) after surgery at in the Department of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital and Buriram Hospital from 20 November 2018. Patients with incomplete documents were excluded from this study.

DATA COLLECTION AND DATA ANALYSIS:

* Pre-operative nutrition status assess by NAF
* Post-operative nutrition status at 1 month and 3 months assess by NAF
* All postoperative complications were collected according to Clavin-Dindo Classification8
* All case were included in this study, following TNM staging and others pathologic parameters :
* Cancer type - Tumor grading
* Lymph node metastasis - Tumor depth

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Digestive System Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients GI cancer
* Elective surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of oncologic treatment information before surgery
* No history of recurrent cancer or more than one cancer disease
* Patients who have been diagnosed with Carcinomatosis peritonei during the operation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chairat Supsamutchai, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Ramathibodi Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Chairat Supsamutchai

Bangkok, Bankok, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/526

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.