Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-09-05
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Conditioned Pain Modulation in Localized vs Widespread Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05972395
Mechanisms of Neuropathic Pain: Investigation by Contact Heat Evoked Potential
NCT00173420
Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-targeted Motor Control Training
NCT02098005
Assessment of LTP-like Pain Amplification in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients
NCT03362827
Muscle Synergies in Pain and Pain Anticipation
NCT07251387
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The secondary objectives are firstly to measure the modifications induced by experimental pain on muscle activation synergies. Secondly, to measure the modifications induced by an experimental pain on the kinematics of the movement during a pointing task during the application of the pain. Finally, to determine if an experimental pain modifies the electrical activity of muscles located in the painful area during a pointing movement and the value of the cumulative sums (CUSUMs).
Inclusion Criteria:
* Males and females of legal age.
* Healthy subjects (who do not have self-reported neurological disorders)
* Subjects who have signed an informed consent (who have a good command of French)
* Subjects who are affiliated with or benefit from a social security plan
Criteria for non-inclusion:
* Psychiatric history obtained by physician questioning: individuals with mental retardation or severe impairment of cognitive, behavioral, or affective functions precluding understanding the protocol and signing informed consent
* Neurological history (epilepsy, stroke, surgeries performed on the brain or spinal cord, and history of neurological diseases affecting motor skills and sensation)
* Subjects who are unable to receive informed information (dementia, hearing problems, poor French proficiency, etc.)
* Contraindications to MST (epilepsy, intracranial metal foreign bodies, hearing aids or cochlear implants)
* Taking psychotropic medications
* Persons under guardianship or conservatorship
* Pregnant and nursing women
* Subjects with pacemakers
Assessment before pain induction:
► Corticospinal excitability of M1: The TMS will be used to establish the input-output (I/O) curves. Stimuli of variable intensity between the threshold value (or MT for motor threshold) and the maximum will be delivered. In total, about ten stimulation intensities will be tested, and for each stimulation intensity, ten stimuli will be delivered, allowing then to calculate the average of the MEPs in order to draw the I/O curves of each participant. As recalled by national and international recommendations, TMS is a noninvasive and painless technique whose use in the scientific literature is extremely abundant.
► Pointing task: The participant will be seated on a chair facing a table so that his or her dominant forearm rests on the table. Markers will be placed at the table and chair legs as well as on the table, corresponding to the two support points of the elbow and the index finger, in order to standardize the starting position. The index finger should be positioned on the midline. The maximum amplitude of the pointing movement on the median line will be determined and then the target of the pointing movement will be placed at 80% of this maximum distance. The investigators chose a single target so that reaction time would not be impacted by too much cognitive load. The investigator will tell the participant to stand by, and then, within 4 to 10 seconds, an audible signal ("beep") will indicate to the subject that he/she should perform the pointing movement. Then the subject will return to the starting position at rest, and the procedure will repeat after a 4-10 second pause. For each evaluation session, 30 pointing movements reaching the target will be performed, the first three of which will not be counted (familiarization). The kinematic parameters of the pointing movements will be recorded using a 3D motion analysis video system. The markers will be placed on C7, and on the dominant side on the acromion, the olecranon, the dorsal aspect of the wrist and on the distal phalanx of the index finger.
► Muscle activation synergies: To measure muscle activations during this pointing task, surface EMG recording of the anterior deltoid and upper trapezius muscles will be performed on the dominant upper limb using a wireless collection system. Raw data of kinematic and EMG parameters will be stored and processed offline. Trials where the reaction time is less than 100ms will be excluded from the analysis.
Assessment during experimental pain:
► Experimental Pain Induction: In this study, the application of a capsaicin 1% patch will be performed at the participant's dominant delto-pectoral groove (between the shoulder stump and pectoral) on intact, non-irritated, dry skin to generate experimental pain. For the purposes of this study, the investigators will remove this patch before the recommended application time (60 minutes) in order to generate a limited pain of 3 to 5/10 on a visual analog scale (VAS).
► Completion of the EKT-CF questionnaire: During the time of onset and stabilization of pain induced by the capsaicin 1% patch, the participant will be asked to complete the EKT-CF questionnaire in computerized form. An evaluation of the pain will be made at this time using a VAS and the value will be noted.
► TMS, Pointing and muscles activation: Once the pain has settled and stabilized, TMS, surface EMG and kinematic measurements will be performed again in the same way as described previously. The similar optimum stimulation point used for the TMS will be rigorously stimulated using the coordinates recorded previously.
The duration of the experimental session is estimated at 2h30min, distributed as follows: Information, eligibility and consent collection: 15 minutes; preparation of the experiment (installation of the electrodes, setting of the devices: 45 minutes; recordings: 90 minutes).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental pain
Experimental pain will be induced at the level of the dominant delto-pectoral groove of the participant (between the shoulder stump and the pectoral).
Experimental pain
Experimental pain will be induced by capsaicin 1% on intact, non-irritated and dry shoulder's skin. For the purposes of this study, we will remove this patch before the recommended application time in order to generate a pain. The participant will be seated on a chair facing a table so that his or her dominant forearm rests on the table. Markers will be placed at the table and chair legs as well as on the table, corresponding to the two support points of the elbow and the index finger, in order to standardize the starting position. The target of the pointing movement will be placed at 80% of this maximum distance. The investigator will tell the participant to stand by, and then, within 4 to 10 seconds, an audible signal will indicate to the subject that he/she should perform the pointing movement. The procedure will repeat after a 4-10 second pause. For each session, 30 pointing movements reaching the target will be performed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Experimental pain
Experimental pain will be induced by capsaicin 1% on intact, non-irritated and dry shoulder's skin. For the purposes of this study, we will remove this patch before the recommended application time in order to generate a pain. The participant will be seated on a chair facing a table so that his or her dominant forearm rests on the table. Markers will be placed at the table and chair legs as well as on the table, corresponding to the two support points of the elbow and the index finger, in order to standardize the starting position. The target of the pointing movement will be placed at 80% of this maximum distance. The investigator will tell the participant to stand by, and then, within 4 to 10 seconds, an audible signal will indicate to the subject that he/she should perform the pointing movement. The procedure will repeat after a 4-10 second pause. For each session, 30 pointing movements reaching the target will be performed.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who have signed an informed consent (who have a good command of French)
* Subjects affiliated with or receiving social security benefits
Exclusion Criteria
* Neurological history (epilepsy, stroke, surgeries performed on the brain or spinal cord, and history of neurological diseases affecting motor skills and sensation)
* Subjects who are unable to receive informed information (dementia, hearing problems, poor French proficiency, etc.)
* Contraindications to MST (epilepsy, intracranial metal foreign bodies, hearing aids or cochlear implants)
* Taking psychotropic medications
* Persons under guardianship or conservatorship
* Pregnant and nursing women
* Subjects with pacemakers
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universite du Littoral Cote d'Opale
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Eurasport
Loos, Nord, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Duport A, Morel P, Leonard G, Devanne H. The influence of pain and kinesiophobia on motor control of the upper limb: how pointing task paradigms can point to new avenues of understanding. Pain. 2024 Sep 1;165(9):2044-2054. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003213. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2022-A00271-42
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.