Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-targeted Motor Control Training

NCT ID: NCT02098005

Last Updated: 2017-05-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-01-31

Study Completion Date

2016-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic spinal pain (CSP) includes chronic low back pain, failed back surgery, chronic whiplash associated disorders, chronic non-traumatic neck pain, etc. The current investigators and others have provided evidence for impaired motor control of spinal muscles in patients with CSP. In addition, there is increasing evidence that central mechanisms, i.e. hyperexcitability of the central nervous system and brain abnormalities (e.g. decreased brain matter density) play a role in CSP. Hence, treatments for CSP should not only address the spinal muscles and joints, but also the brain. Therefore, a modern neuroscience approach, comprising of pain neuroscience education followed by cognition-targeted motor control training, can be applied.

The scientific objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach vs. usual care evidence-based physiotherapy for reducing pain and improving functioning in Flemish patients with CSP. A secondary objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach vs. usual care evidence-based physiotherapy for altering brain's structure and function (magnetic Resonance Imaging) in Flemish patients with CSP. Therefore, a multi-center triple-blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted.

To comply with this scientific objective, 120 CSP patients will be recruited and subjected to the baseline assessment. The baseline assessment includes the assessment of pain (including symptoms of central sensitization and conditioned pain modulation), the assessment of restrictions in functioning, brain imaging, the evaluation of motor control and muscle properties, spinal mobility, and psychosocial correlates. Baseline analysis will provide descriptive statistics and will lead to calculate correlation between the different outcome measures and predictors of pain and dysfunctioning. In a next step, included patients will be randomized to the experimental or control group. Those in the experimental group will receive neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training. Those in the control group will be subjected to a control intervention, including back/neck school and general exercises. After the neuroscience education has been given, the experimental subjects will fill in the neurophysiology of pain test. Several follow-up assessments will take place. Part of the assessment (functionality (PDI questionnaire) and psychosocial correlates (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Illness Perception Questionnaire revised (IPQ-R)) will be re-evaluated after the first 3 sessions. The complete 'baseline' assessment will be repeated in the month following the treatment complement, rounding up the short-term follow-up assessment. Six months after the baseline assessment, pain, functioning and psychological correlates are assessed in an intermediate online assessment. One year after baseline assessment the complete assessment is repeated for the last time, unless the intermediate assessment indicates that treatment effects are no longer present. Both short and long term treatment effects can be studied and predictors for therapy success can be unraveled. Also correlations between changes in different outcome measures can provide relevant and innovative information.

The proof of principal suggests a strong effect reported by large effect sizes for pain and disability compared to usual care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Spinal Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual care

usual care evidence-based physiotherapy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

usual care evidence-based physiotherapy

Intervention Type OTHER

Arm 1 (i.e., the control group) will be subjected to a control intervention, including back/neck school and general exercises. 3 sessions of education (session 1: group session; session 2: online module; session 3: individual session) will be given by a physiotherapist, followed by 15 sessions of traditional physiotherapy and general exercises. The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.

modern neuroscience approach

modern neuroscience approach

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

modern neuroscience approach

Intervention Type OTHER

Arm 2 (i.e., the experimental group) will receive pain neuroscience education (3 sessions of education), followed by 15 sessions of cognition-targeted motor control training (15 sessions). The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

usual care evidence-based physiotherapy

Arm 1 (i.e., the control group) will be subjected to a control intervention, including back/neck school and general exercises. 3 sessions of education (session 1: group session; session 2: online module; session 3: individual session) will be given by a physiotherapist, followed by 15 sessions of traditional physiotherapy and general exercises. The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.

Intervention Type OTHER

modern neuroscience approach

Arm 2 (i.e., the experimental group) will receive pain neuroscience education (3 sessions of education), followed by 15 sessions of cognition-targeted motor control training (15 sessions). The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nonspecific spinal pain of at least 3 months' duration, at least 3 days per week
* Aged between 18 and 65 years
* Seeking care because of neck pain or low back pain
* Living or working within a radius of 50 km around the therapy location
* Not starting new treatments or medication and continuing their usual care 6 weeks prior to and during study participation (to obtain a steady state)
* Nonspecific failed back surgery \> 3 years are permitted
* Not undertaking exercise (\> 3 metabolic Equivalents) 3 days before the experiment
* Refraining from analgesics 48h prior to assessments.
* Abstaining from caffeine, alcohol or nicotine 24h prior to assessment

Exclusion Criteria

* Neuropathic pain
* Chronic widespread pain
* Being pregnant or having given birth in the preceding year
* Contra-indications related to MRI imaging
* History of specific spinal surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lieven Danneels, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Ghent

Jo Nijs, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University Hospital

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Universiteit Gent (UGent), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dpt. Of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, BE-9000 Gent (Belgium)

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Dpt. of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy

Jette, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Van Bogaert W, Liew BXW, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Valera-Calero JA, Varol U, Coppieters I, Kregel J, Nijs J, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Danneels L, Malfliet A. Exploring Interactions Between Sex, Pain Characteristics, Disability, and Quality of Life in People With Chronic Spinal Pain: A Structural Equation Model. J Pain. 2024 Mar;25(3):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.010. Epub 2023 Oct 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37871684 (View on PubMed)

Van Bogaert W, Coppieters I, Kregel J, Nijs J, De Pauw R, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Danneels L, Malfliet A. Influence of Baseline Kinesiophobia Levels on Treatment Outcome in People With Chronic Spinal Pain. Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6):pzab076. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab076.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33611503 (View on PubMed)

Willaert W, Malfliet A, Coppieters I, Lenoir D, De Pauw R, Danneels L, Roussel N, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Nijs J, Kregel J. Does Pain Neuroscience Education and Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training Improve Cervical Motor Output? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Pract. 2020 Jul;20(6):600-614. doi: 10.1111/papr.12884. Epub 2020 Apr 20.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32187789 (View on PubMed)

Lenoir D, Coppieters I, Willaert W, Kregel J, Danneels L, Cagnie B, Meeus M, Nijs J, Malfliet A. Do sociodemographic features, pain sensitivity or pain catastrophizing relate to clinic-based adherence to physiotherapy in people suffering from chronic spinal pain? Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Dec;44:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102066. Epub 2019 Sep 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31605983 (View on PubMed)

Malfliet A, Kregel J, Coppieters I, De Pauw R, Meeus M, Roussel N, Cagnie B, Danneels L, Nijs J. Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training on Chronic Spinal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):808-817. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0492.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29710099 (View on PubMed)

Malfliet A, Kregel J, Meeus M, Roussel N, Danneels L, Cagnie B, Dolphens M, Nijs J. Blended-Learning Pain Neuroscience Education for People With Chronic Spinal Pain: Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):357-368. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx092.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29669079 (View on PubMed)

Dolphens M, Nijs J, Cagnie B, Meeus M, Roussel N, Kregel J, Malfliet A, Vanderstraeten G, Danneels L. Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 8;15:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-149.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24885889 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EC/2013/1133

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.