Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-targeted Motor Control Training
NCT ID: NCT02098005
Last Updated: 2017-05-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-01-31
2016-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The scientific objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach vs. usual care evidence-based physiotherapy for reducing pain and improving functioning in Flemish patients with CSP. A secondary objective entails examining the effectiveness of the modern neuroscience approach vs. usual care evidence-based physiotherapy for altering brain's structure and function (magnetic Resonance Imaging) in Flemish patients with CSP. Therefore, a multi-center triple-blind randomized controlled trial will be conducted.
To comply with this scientific objective, 120 CSP patients will be recruited and subjected to the baseline assessment. The baseline assessment includes the assessment of pain (including symptoms of central sensitization and conditioned pain modulation), the assessment of restrictions in functioning, brain imaging, the evaluation of motor control and muscle properties, spinal mobility, and psychosocial correlates. Baseline analysis will provide descriptive statistics and will lead to calculate correlation between the different outcome measures and predictors of pain and dysfunctioning. In a next step, included patients will be randomized to the experimental or control group. Those in the experimental group will receive neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training. Those in the control group will be subjected to a control intervention, including back/neck school and general exercises. After the neuroscience education has been given, the experimental subjects will fill in the neurophysiology of pain test. Several follow-up assessments will take place. Part of the assessment (functionality (PDI questionnaire) and psychosocial correlates (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Illness Perception Questionnaire revised (IPQ-R)) will be re-evaluated after the first 3 sessions. The complete 'baseline' assessment will be repeated in the month following the treatment complement, rounding up the short-term follow-up assessment. Six months after the baseline assessment, pain, functioning and psychological correlates are assessed in an intermediate online assessment. One year after baseline assessment the complete assessment is repeated for the last time, unless the intermediate assessment indicates that treatment effects are no longer present. Both short and long term treatment effects can be studied and predictors for therapy success can be unraveled. Also correlations between changes in different outcome measures can provide relevant and innovative information.
The proof of principal suggests a strong effect reported by large effect sizes for pain and disability compared to usual care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Modern Pain Neuroscience Applied to Chronic Pain in Patients With Chronic Whiplash Associated Disorders
NCT03239938
Shifting Away From Pain: a Neurocognitive Approach in Treatment of Whiplash
NCT04077619
Efficacy of Pain Neurophysiology Education in Combination With Psychologic Inoculation in Chronic Whiplash
NCT01544075
Pain Neuroscience Education in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT03100721
Effectiveness of a Pain Neuroscience Education and Therapeutic Exercise Program Delivered by Primary Care Physiotherapists to Patients With Chronic Nociplastic Spinal Pain
NCT07133607
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care
usual care evidence-based physiotherapy
usual care evidence-based physiotherapy
Arm 1 (i.e., the control group) will be subjected to a control intervention, including back/neck school and general exercises. 3 sessions of education (session 1: group session; session 2: online module; session 3: individual session) will be given by a physiotherapist, followed by 15 sessions of traditional physiotherapy and general exercises. The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.
modern neuroscience approach
modern neuroscience approach
modern neuroscience approach
Arm 2 (i.e., the experimental group) will receive pain neuroscience education (3 sessions of education), followed by 15 sessions of cognition-targeted motor control training (15 sessions). The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
usual care evidence-based physiotherapy
Arm 1 (i.e., the control group) will be subjected to a control intervention, including back/neck school and general exercises. 3 sessions of education (session 1: group session; session 2: online module; session 3: individual session) will be given by a physiotherapist, followed by 15 sessions of traditional physiotherapy and general exercises. The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.
modern neuroscience approach
Arm 2 (i.e., the experimental group) will receive pain neuroscience education (3 sessions of education), followed by 15 sessions of cognition-targeted motor control training (15 sessions). The 18 sessions will be spread over a period of 3 months.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged between 18 and 65 years
* Seeking care because of neck pain or low back pain
* Living or working within a radius of 50 km around the therapy location
* Not starting new treatments or medication and continuing their usual care 6 weeks prior to and during study participation (to obtain a steady state)
* Nonspecific failed back surgery \> 3 years are permitted
* Not undertaking exercise (\> 3 metabolic Equivalents) 3 days before the experiment
* Refraining from analgesics 48h prior to assessments.
* Abstaining from caffeine, alcohol or nicotine 24h prior to assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic widespread pain
* Being pregnant or having given birth in the preceding year
* Contra-indications related to MRI imaging
* History of specific spinal surgery
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie
OTHER
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
OTHER
University Hospital, Ghent
OTHER
University Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lieven Danneels, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Ghent
Jo Nijs, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, , Belgium
Universiteit Gent (UGent), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dpt. Of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, BE-9000 Gent (Belgium)
Ghent, , Belgium
Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Dpt. of Rehabilitation Sciences & Physiotherapy
Jette, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Van Bogaert W, Liew BXW, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Valera-Calero JA, Varol U, Coppieters I, Kregel J, Nijs J, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Danneels L, Malfliet A. Exploring Interactions Between Sex, Pain Characteristics, Disability, and Quality of Life in People With Chronic Spinal Pain: A Structural Equation Model. J Pain. 2024 Mar;25(3):791-804. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.10.010. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
Van Bogaert W, Coppieters I, Kregel J, Nijs J, De Pauw R, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Danneels L, Malfliet A. Influence of Baseline Kinesiophobia Levels on Treatment Outcome in People With Chronic Spinal Pain. Phys Ther. 2021 Jun 1;101(6):pzab076. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab076.
Willaert W, Malfliet A, Coppieters I, Lenoir D, De Pauw R, Danneels L, Roussel N, Meeus M, Cagnie B, Nijs J, Kregel J. Does Pain Neuroscience Education and Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training Improve Cervical Motor Output? Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Pain Pract. 2020 Jul;20(6):600-614. doi: 10.1111/papr.12884. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Lenoir D, Coppieters I, Willaert W, Kregel J, Danneels L, Cagnie B, Meeus M, Nijs J, Malfliet A. Do sociodemographic features, pain sensitivity or pain catastrophizing relate to clinic-based adherence to physiotherapy in people suffering from chronic spinal pain? Secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019 Dec;44:102066. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2019.102066. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
Malfliet A, Kregel J, Coppieters I, De Pauw R, Meeus M, Roussel N, Cagnie B, Danneels L, Nijs J. Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training on Chronic Spinal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018 Jul 1;75(7):808-817. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0492.
Malfliet A, Kregel J, Meeus M, Roussel N, Danneels L, Cagnie B, Dolphens M, Nijs J. Blended-Learning Pain Neuroscience Education for People With Chronic Spinal Pain: Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial. Phys Ther. 2018 May 1;98(5):357-368. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx092.
Dolphens M, Nijs J, Cagnie B, Meeus M, Roussel N, Kregel J, Malfliet A, Vanderstraeten G, Danneels L. Efficacy of a modern neuroscience approach versus usual care evidence-based physiotherapy on pain, disability and brain characteristics in chronic spinal pain patients: protocol of a randomized clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 May 8;15:149. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-149.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EC/2013/1133
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.