Neurophysiological Basis of Rehabilitation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Type I and Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT02347579
Last Updated: 2018-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
69 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2014-06-30
2018-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The therapy offered to CRPS-I patients is diverse and can involve invasive and non-invasive interventions. Current (inter)national guidelines recommend physiotherapy as the best non-invasive treatment for rehabilitation. Recently, cognitive and behavioural Graded Exposure in Vivo (GEXP) therapy aimed at reducing pain-related fear was found to be effective (De Jong et al. 2005), and more effective than standard physical therapy (ReMOVE study, articles in preparation). By reducing pain-related fear EXP might reconcile motor output and sensory feedback.
Another type of pain is lower back pain (LBP), which affects 70% to 85% of general population, but usually heals within 12 weeks in 90% of patients. The rest of the patients suffer from intractable, chronic LBP despite no evident organic abnormality. Research shows that also in these patients cognitive and behavioural aspects of pain are important and related to physical performance and self-reported disability (Vlaeyen et al., 2000). Several studies have demonstrated the success of GEXP in this patient group: GEXP resulted in improvements in pain-related fear, catastrophizing, performance of daily relevant activities, and in pain intensity (Leeuw et al., 2008).
This study aims to investigate the effect of GEXP on brain regions involved in the processing of harmless tactile stimuli in CRPS-I and CLBP patients, as well as its effect on tactile discrimination thresholds. We hypothesize that GEXP will induce 1) an improvement of tactile discrimination thresholds, 2) a functional reorganization of primary and secondary somatosensory cortex (in regions related to the affected limb in CRPS-I; and to the back in LBP), 3) changes in activation of emotional brain circuits during non-noxious stimulation, 4) changes in resting state connectivity between emotional and sensory brain areas, 5) changes in measures reflecting white matter integrity. No systematic changes are expected in the healthy controls.
Patients diagnosed with CRPS-I and CLBP will participate in a Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) experiment. In this observational study, we examine the effects of GEXP treatment that all patients receive as part of usual care. Anatomical as well as diffusion-weighted and T2\*-weighted (Blood oxygenation level dependent) MR images will be acquired. The study has a 3x4 split plot design with group (CRPS-I patients and CLBP receiving GEXP treatment / healthy controls) as between-subjects variable and time (pre-, during, post-treatment and follow-up) as within-subject variable.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain Inhibition and Facilitation in Recurrent Low Back Pain
NCT03463759
Cognitive Multisensory Rehabilitation for CRPS Treatment
NCT06587750
Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-targeted Motor Control Training
NCT02098005
Multidisciplinary Primary Rehabilitation Care for Patients With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain
NCT05530902
Physical and Psychological Changes in CRPS Patients Undergoing Multimodal Rehabilitation
NCT05696587
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with CRPS
Patients with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Type I
No interventions assigned to this group
Patients with CLBP
Patients with chronic low back pain
No interventions assigned to this group
Healthy controls
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A clinical diagnosis of CRPS-I according to 'the Budapest criteria' for research purposes (Harden et al., 2007):
* Continuing pain, which is disproportionate to any inciting event
* Must report at least one symptom in all of the four following categories:
* Sensory: Reports of hyperesthesia and/or allodynia
* Vasomotor: Reports of temperature asymmetry and/or skin color changes and/or skin color asymmetry
* Sudomotor / Edema: Reports of edema and/or sweating changes and/or sweating asymmetry
* Motor / Trophic: Reports of decreased range of motion and/or motor dysfunction (weakness, tremor, dystonia) and/or trophic changes (hair, nail, skin)
* Must display at least one sign at time of evaluation in two or more of the following categories:
* Sensory: Evidence of hyperalgesia (to pinprick) and/or allodynia (to light touch and/or temperature sensation and/or deep somatic pressure and/or joint movement)
* Vasomotor: Evidence of temperature asymmetry and/or skin color changes and/or asymmetry
* Sudomotor / Edema: Evidence of edema and/or sweating changes and/or sweating asymmetry
* Motor / Trophic: Evidence of decreased range of motion and/or motor dysfunction (weakness, tremor, dystonia) and/or trophic changes (hair, nail, skin)
* There is no other diagnosis that better explains the signs and symptoms
* Unilateral localization on upper or lower extremity
CLBP patients:
* Experience of non-specific lower back pain for at least three months
* No other diagnosis better explaining the signs and symptoms. both patient groups:
* Report of substantial fear of movement/(re)-injury
* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Stable medication
healthy controls:
* Age between 18 and 65 years
* Matched for age, gender and handedness
Exclusion Criteria
* Neuropathy of the upper or lower extremities
* MRI incompatible health condition (e. g. pacemaker, metal prosthetic devices)
* Psychiatric condition and ongoing medication that would alter emotional/sensory processing
* Previous tactile impairment in the upper or lower extremity caused by:
* damage to the sensory apparatus
* CNS lesion
healthy controls:
• (history of) CRPS or other chronic pain syndromes
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University
OTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Maastricht University
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL35546.068.11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.