Graded Exposure (GEXP) in Vivo Versus Physiotherapy in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type I (CRPS-I)
NCT ID: NCT00625976
Last Updated: 2014-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-05-31
2014-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Research on the treatment of CRPS-I, as described in the Dutch evidence based treatment guidelines (Richtlijn Complex Regional Pain Syndrome type I, 2006), mainly showed improvement at the level of pain and coping with pain. Only little improvement in functional restoration was found. Research in other pain populations such al neck- and back-pain patients has shown that pain related fear contributes to the development of functional disability. GEXP in vivo which aims on systematically reducing fear of movement, shows promising results in CRPS-I patients (de Jong et al., 2005).
Objective:
The objective of the proposed project is to compare the effectivity of GEXP in vivo with that of standardized physiotherapy in CRPS-I patients with pain related fear.
Design:
The study concerns a single blinded, single center, randomized clinical trial. The treatment will be preceded by two pre-measures. After treatment there will be one post-measurement and 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up measurements.
Population:
The study population will consist of chronic CRPS-I patients between 18 and 65, with pain related fear (PHODA-LE-score ≥ 35 and PHODA-UE-score ≥ 32).
Intervention:
The two interventions that will be compared are GEXP in vivo (de Jong et al., 2005) and standardized physiotherapy according to the protocol of Oerlemans, Oostendorp, de Boo en Goris (1999). The GEXP in vivo comprises 17 sessions of one hour, the physiotherapy treatment of 34 sessions of 30 minutes. Both treatments will be given over a period of 17 weeks.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility of a Combination of Graded Pain Exposure and Graded Motor Imagery in People With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type 1
NCT05998889
Psychological Intervention and Physiotherapy With Medication Improves CRPS Patients Outcome
NCT02467556
Physical and Psychological Changes in CRPS Patients Undergoing Multimodal Rehabilitation
NCT05696587
Neurophysiological Basis of Rehabilitation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Type I and Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02347579
The Effectiveness of Conservative Treatment in Patients With Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.
NCT07208825
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Graded exposure in vivo
Graded exposure in vivo according to the protocol of de Jong et al. (2005)
2
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy according to the protocol of Oerlemans, Oostendorp, de Boo and Goris (1999)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Graded exposure in vivo
Graded exposure in vivo according to the protocol of de Jong et al. (2005)
Physiotherapy
Physiotherapy according to the protocol of Oerlemans, Oostendorp, de Boo and Goris (1999)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pain related (PHODA-LE-score ≥ 35 and PHODA-UE-score ≥ 32)
3. Age between 18 and 65.
4. Rehabilitation treatment has been indicated.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Insufficient fluency in Dutch.
3. Generalized pain syndrome.
4. Dystonia.
5. Sympathectomy of the affected extremity.
6. Psychopathology
7. Involvement in a claim regarding the disease.
8. Substance abuse.
9. Symptoms on both upper or both lower extremities.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marielle Goossens, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NL20067.068.08
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
MEC 08-3-004
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.