Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
8 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-04-08
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The treatment of ARDS is based on the antagonistic need to maintain hematosis and reduce parenchymal insult secondary to mechanical ventilation. Optimization of mechanical ventilation consists in reducing the volume of gas administered at each respiratory cycle and in limiting thoracic parietal stress by the use of curares. More recently, the interest of the ventral decubitus position has been demonstrated. During such a maneuver, the posterior pulmonary parenchymatous zones, usually subjected to gravity in the supine position, will be able to re-expand under the effect of the prone position and of the positive pressure induced by the ventilator. The increase in parietal elastance, due to the compression of the thorax between the posterior part of the trunk and the bed, also contributes to an improvement in the distribution of inhaled gases within the pulmonary parenchyma by limiting the loss of energy, transmitted directly to the wall. The ventral decubitus position allows to redistribute the ventilation in territories which were not aired before but which participate to the respiratory exchanges because they are still perfused and thus to improve the pulmonary compliance measured.
Although described as an atypical form, SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to ARDS with severe forms of viral pneumonia and thus require prone positioning.
While this results in improved oxygenation and compliance, prone positioning is accompanied by a risk of complications such as pressure sores, described as the most frequent. In addition, the massive influx of patients and more generally the lack of personnel during pandemic peaks has made the application of prone position sometimes complex because it requires human resources. As a result, the benefit/risk ratio of the maneuver is difficult to determine because not all patients respond in the same way to prone positioning. It appeared essential to be able to predict the expected benefit of the prone position before performing the procubitus maneuver.
The application of thoracic and abdominal pressures, as part of the respiratory management of patients, is a technique commonly used by physiotherapists. Investigators have demonstrated a similar change in measured lung parenchymal compliance during manual compression of a patient's chest and during prone positioning. In the context of the epidemic, investigators used this test systematically to determine which patients were most likely to benefit from prone positioning and for whom the available resources should be concentrated at any given time.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Chest Compression on Respiratory Mechanics in ARDS Patients
NCT05598476
Effects of Extravascular Lung Water on Prone Position Efficacy in Patients With ARDS
NCT04635267
Physiological Studies in the Prone Position in Patients With ARDS
NCT06586736
Artificial Increase in Chest Wall Elastance as an Alternative to Prone Positioning in Moderate-to-severe ARDS.
NCT03719937
Effect of Prone Positioning on Mortality in Patients With Mild to Moderate Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
NCT05056090
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient hospitalized in the ICU for acute respiratory distress syndrome at Covid-19
* Ventilated intubated patient for whom prone sessions were offered
* Patient who received respiratory physical therapy sessions on the same day as the prone position
* French-speaking patient
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient on invasive mechanical ventilation for another etiology than Covid-19
* Patient under guardianship or curatorship
* Patient deprived of liberty
* Patient under court protection
* Patient objecting to the use of his/her data for this research
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Christophe Romanet
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gattinoni L, Taccone P, Carlesso E, Marini JJ. Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Rationale, indications, and limits. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Dec 1;188(11):1286-93. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201308-1532CI.
Villar J. What is the acute respiratory distress syndrome? Respir Care. 2011 Oct;56(10):1539-45. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01395.
Fan E, Brodie D, Slutsky AS. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment. JAMA. 2018 Feb 20;319(7):698-710. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21907.
Munshi L, Del Sorbo L, Adhikari NKJ, Hodgson CL, Wunsch H, Meade MO, Uleryk E, Mancebo J, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Fan E. Prone Position for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Oct;14(Supplement_4):S280-S288. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201704-343OT.
Tirolien JA, Garnier M. [COVID-19, an atypical acute respiratory distress syndrome]. Prat Anesth Reanim. 2020 Sep;24(4):225-229. doi: 10.1016/j.pratan.2020.07.001. Epub 2020 Jul 10. French.
Borges LF, Saraiva MS, Saraiva MAS, Macagnan FE, Kessler A. Expiratory rib cage compression in mechanically ventilated adults: systematic review with meta-analysis. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2017 Jan-Mar;29(1):96-104. doi: 10.5935/0103-507X.20170014.
Sweeney RM, McAuley DF. Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Lancet. 2016 Nov 12;388(10058):2416-2430. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00578-X. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CA_C_PRO
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.