Coaching Teachers in Bullying Detection and Intervention

NCT ID: NCT05321342

Last Updated: 2025-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2026-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators' overall objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of the Bullying Classroom Check-Up (BCCU) on elementary aged students' aggressive and bullying behaviors, teacher practices, and student and teacher relationships. The investigators' principal hypothesis is that the BCCU will improve students' aggression and bullying behaviors and their perceptions of the school climate and relationships in the building as well as teacher practices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim 1: Examine the Efficacy of the Bullying Classroom Check-Up (BCCU) at improving child aggressive and bullying behaviors For this aim, the study team will examine student self-report measures and classroom observational data at post-test (end of year 1) and in the follow-up assessment (winter of following school year). The study team will focus on their own aggression and bullying behavior as well as their perceptions of the general bullying climate, rating of safety, and positive bystander behaviors (i.e., how students respond to bullying when they witness it). The study team hypothesize that children in schools randomized to the BCCU condition will be less likely to engage in aggression and bullying, will rate the general bullying climate (i.e., perceptions that bullying is a problem and that adults/students do enough to stop bullying) and sense of safety more positively, and engage in more positive bystander behaviors than children in schools randomized to the control condition.

Aim 2: Examine the efficacy of the BCCU at improving teacher practices and relationships For this aim, the study team will examine teacher and aggregated student self-report measures and classroom observational data at post-test (end of year 1) and in the follow-up assessment (winter of following school year). The study team will focus on teacher self-reported, observed, and student-reported classroom practices as well as perceptions from teachers and students about relationships within the school. The investigators' hypotheses are that teachers in the BCCU condition will engage in more preventive classroom management and intervention strategies (e.g., modeling social emotional competencies such as empathy) in response to bullying than teachers in the control condition, and that teacher-student and student-student relationships will be more positive in classrooms in the BCCU condition than in the control condition.

Exploratory Aim 3: Explore the moderating role of fidelity in the main outcomes of interest. Explore the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy and behavior management practices on distal outcomes.

For this exploratory aim, the study team will examine how fidelity indicators (e.g., dosage, coach adherence, as reported by coaches) moderates intermediate teacher outcomes (e.g., teacher practices) within the main effect models. The study team will also examine how changes in teacher intermediate outcomes (e.g., teacher efficacy and practices) relate to the follow-up year's classroom climate (e.g., relationships) as reported by students (aggregated) and teachers in mediation models.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intervention Control

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Half of the schools each year will be recruited from the School District of Philadelphia (SDP) and half from the Anne Arundel County Public Schools (AACPS) in Maryland. Within site, half of the schools will be assigned to the BCCU intervention and half will be in the control ("business as usual" condition; data collection only, plus an offer of a classroom management PD after research participation ends).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention group

This group will receive Professional Development and Coaching (CCU)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bullying Classroom Check-Up (BCCU)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

BCCU professional development (PD) modules will be provided to all staff in intervention schools as part of their standard, school-approved professional development practices to provide knowledge and awareness for bullying identification, prevention, and intervention. In addition, consented 3rd-5th grade teachers will participate in the BCCU intervention. The coaching follows the original Classroom Check-Up model (Reinke, Herman, \& Sprick, 2011), embedding 5 steps (i.e., assessment of the classroom, feedback to teacher, goal setting and plan, ongoing coaching and guided practice in the TeachLivE© mixed-reality simulator \[developed at the University of Central Florida (UCF); Dieker, Hynes, Hughes, \& Smith, 2008\], and self-monitoring) and utilizing motivational interviewing (Miller \& Rollnick, 2012) to empower teacher practice change.

Control group

Business as usual

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bullying Classroom Check-Up (BCCU)

BCCU professional development (PD) modules will be provided to all staff in intervention schools as part of their standard, school-approved professional development practices to provide knowledge and awareness for bullying identification, prevention, and intervention. In addition, consented 3rd-5th grade teachers will participate in the BCCU intervention. The coaching follows the original Classroom Check-Up model (Reinke, Herman, \& Sprick, 2011), embedding 5 steps (i.e., assessment of the classroom, feedback to teacher, goal setting and plan, ongoing coaching and guided practice in the TeachLivE© mixed-reality simulator \[developed at the University of Central Florida (UCF); Dieker, Hynes, Hughes, \& Smith, 2008\], and self-monitoring) and utilizing motivational interviewing (Miller \& Rollnick, 2012) to empower teacher practice change.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Urban to urban fringe districts in the Northeast US
2. Predominately minority student body (\> 65%)
3. Relatively large school with at least two 3rd, 4th, and 5th grade classrooms



1\) All students of consented teachers will be eligible to participate in survey activities.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Teachers in grades other than 3, 4, or 5 during the first year
2. Special education teachers
3. Specials (e.g., art, music) teachers


1. Students who do not speak English.
2. Special education students who are not integrated within the regular education classroom (i.e., receive education in self-contained classrooms).
Minimum Eligible Age

8 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Virginia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Sheppard Pratt Health System

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elise Pas, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Tracy Waasdorp, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Elise Pas, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

410-502-8506

Tracy Waasdorp, Ph.D.

Role: CONTACT

267-426-9286

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Elise Pas, Ph.D.

Role: primary

410-502-8506

Tracy Waasdorp, Ph.D.

Role: primary

267-426-9286

Brooke Paskewich, Ph.D.

Role: backup

215-590-3193

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-018301

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IRB00015114

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1R01HD102491-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluation of HRP Among Pre-K Through 5th Grade
NCT06388850 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA
Multisite Prevention of Conduct Problems (Fast Track)
NCT01653535 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA